Testing rank similarity in the local average treatment effects model

References

• Abadie, A. (2003). Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models. Journal of Econometrics 113(2):231–263. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00201-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadie, A., Angrist, J., Imbens, G. (2002). Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings. Econometrica 70(1):91–117. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., Evans, W. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. The American Economic Review 88:450–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S. (1986). Hypothesis testing in unidentified models. The Review of Economic Studies 53(4):635–651. doi:10.2307/2297609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., Fernández-Val, I., Melly, B. (2013). Inference on counterfactual distributions. Econometrica 81:2205–2268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C. (2005). An IV model of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica 73(1):245–261. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., Hansen, C. (2013). Quantile models with endogeneity. Annual Review of Economics 5(1):57–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110952
   Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov, V., Imbens, G. W., Newey, W. K. (2007). Instrumental variable estimation of nonseparable models. Journal of Econometrics 139(1):4–14. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesher, A. (2003). Identification in nonseparable models. Econometrica 71(5):1405–1441. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):424–455. doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Haultfoeuille, X., Février, P. (2015). Identification of nonseparable triangular models with discrete instruments. Econometrica 83(3):1199–1210. doi:10.3982/ECTA10038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Shen, S. (2018). Testing for rank invariance or similarity in program evaluation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100(1):78–85. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foresi, S., Peracchi, F. (1995). The conditional distribution of excess returns: an empirical analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430):451–466. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, B. R., Lefgren, L. J. (2018). Testing rank similarity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100(1):86–91. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, B. R., Lefgren, L. J., Leslie, E. C. (2019). Judging judge fixed effects. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., Horowitz, J. (1996). Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized-method-of-moments estimators. Econometrica 64(4):891–916. doi:10.2307/2171849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (2001). Micro data, heterogeneity, and the evaluation of public policy: Nobel lecture. Journal of Political Economy 109(4):673–748. doi:10.1086/322086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Pinto, R. (2018). Unordered monotonicity. Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society 86(1):35–35. doi:10.3982/ECTA13777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Urzua, S. (2010). Comparing IV with structural models: What simple IV can and cannot identify. Journal of Econometrics 156(1):27–37. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Urzua, S., Vytlacil, E. (2006). Understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity. Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3):389–432. doi:10.1162/rest.88.3.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Vytlacil, E. (2005). Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica 73(3):669–738. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W. (2010). Better late than nothing: Some comments on deaton (2009) and heckman and urzua (2009). Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):399–423. doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475. doi:10.2307/2951620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbens, G. W., Newey, W. (2009). Identification and estimation of triangular simultaneous equations models without additivity. Econometrica 77:1481–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., Park, B. G. (2018). Weak convergence of local quantile treatment effect processes. Economics Letters 162:49–52. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, T. (2015). A test for instrument validity. Econometrica 83(5):2043–2063. doi:10.3982/ECTA11974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R., Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46(1):33–50. doi:10.2307/1913643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzkin, R. L. (2003). Nonparametric estimation of nonadditive random functions. Econometrica 71(5):1339–1375. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourifié, I., Wan, Y. (2017). Testing local average treatment effect assumptions. The Review of Economics and Statistics 99(2):305–313. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey, W. K. (1997). Convergence rates and asymptotic normality for series estimators. Journal of Econometrics 79(1):147–168. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00011-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., Pollard, D. (1989). Simulation and the asymptotics of optimization estimators. Econometrica 57(5):1027–1057. doi:10.2307/1913622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgovitsky, A. (2015). Identification of nonseparable models using instruments with small support. Econometrica 83(3):1185–1197. doi:10.3982/ECTA9984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q., Xu, H. (2017). Counterfactual mapping and individual treatment effects in nonseparable models with discrete endogeneity. Quantitative Economics 8(2):589–610. doi:10.3982/QE579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vytlacil, E. (2015). Discussion of “Testing for rank invariance or similarity in program evaluation: The effects of training on earnings revisited”, 2015 Becker Friedman Institute Interactions conference, Chicago, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, K. (2020). A comparison of two quantile models with endogeneity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 38(2):443–456. doi:10.1080/07350015.2018.1514307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, P. (2017). Testing conditional rank similarity with and without covariates. Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar