Digital legacy: Designing with things

References

• Brown, B., (ed.) (2004). Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). We will never forget you [online]: An empirical investigation of post-mortem myspace comments. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 123–132). CSCW 2011, March 19–23, 2011, Hangzhou, China. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. L. (2008). Political satire in Terry Pratchett's discworld (doctoral dissertation). Elon, NC: Elon University. Retrieved from http://elonuniversity.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15446coll7/id/115
   Google Scholar
• Ellis Gray, S. (2012). The diversity of mourning practices online. Aberdeen: Digital Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1922). Mourning and melancholia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 56, 543–545.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, K., & Stolterman, E. (2014). Series Foreword. In J. Simonsen, C. Svabo, S. M. Strandvad, K. Samson, M. Hertzum, & O. E. Hansen (Eds.), Situated design methods, (pp. vii–xiii). Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garde-Hansen, J. (2009). My memories? Personal digital archive fever and Facebook. In J. Garde-Hansen, A. Hoskins, & A. Reading, Save as… Digital memories (pp. 135–150). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Getty, E., Cobb, J., Gabeler, M., Nelson, C., Weng, E., & Hancock, J. (2011). May. I said your name in an empty room: Grieving and continuing bonds on Facebook. Paper presented at Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 997–1000). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Giaxoglou, K. (2014). “RIP man… u are missed and loved by many”: Entextualising moments of mourning on a Facebook Rest In Peace group site. Thanatos, 3, 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M. R., Carter, M., & Mori, J. (2013). Vile Rat: Spontaneous SHrines in EVE Online. Paper presented at Workshop proceedings of the 8th international conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 14–17). Hyannis, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R. (2010). Texture: Human expression in the age of communications overload. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Haverinen, A. (2014). Memoria virtualis: Death and mourning rituals in online environments (doctoral dissertation). University of Turku. Retrieved from http://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/98454
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (Trans). (1971). "The Thing" in poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstader, Trans.). New York, NY:HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Henare, A., Holbraad, M. & Wastell, S. (Eds.) (2007). Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, M. D. (2015). Mourning 2.0-continuing bonds between the living and the dead on facebook. Omega, 72(2), 119–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karana, E., Giaccardi, E., Stamhuis, N., & Goossensen, J. (2016). The tuning of materials: A designer's journey. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 619–631). Brisbane, QLD, Australia: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kasket, E. (2012). Continuing bonds in the age of social networking: Facebook as a modern-day medium. Bereavement Care, 31, 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., & Street, P. E. (2009, September). Beyond design thinking: Designas-practice and designs-in-practice. Paper presented at CRESC Conference, Manchester. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.lucykimbell.com/stuff/CRESC_Kimbell_v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & Sellen, A. (2008). On human remains: Excavating the home archive. Cambridge, UK: Microsoft Research.
   Google Scholar
• Klass, D. (2006). Continuing conversation about continuing bonds. Death Studies, 30, 843–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klastrup, L. (2015). “I didn't know her, but…”: Parasocial mourning of mediated deaths on Facebook RIP pages. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 21, 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.) (2015). Materiality. London, UK: Whitechapel Gallery and Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory [Database]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2008). A cautious prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). Paper present at Proceedings of the 2008 annual international conference of the design history society (pp. 2–10). Falmouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwit, S. J., & Klass, D. (1995). Grief and the role of the inner representation of the deceased. Omega – Journal of Death and Dying, 30, 283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massimi, M., & Baecker, R. M. (2010, April). A death in the family: Opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved. Paper presented at Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1821–1830). Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Wright, P., Wallace, J., & Dearden, A. (2006). The experience of enchantment in human–computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10, 369–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. (1998). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Moncur, W., & Kirk, D. (2014). An emergent framework for digital memorials. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 965–974). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Moncur, W., Julius, M., Van Den Hoven, E., & Kirk, D. (2015). Story Shell: The participatory design of a bespoke digital memorial. Paper presented at Proceedings of 4th Participatory Innovation Conference (pp. 470–477).
   Google Scholar
• Neimeyer, R. (2005). Grief, loss, and the quest for meaning: Narrative contributions to bereavement care. Bereavement Care, 24 (2), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Neisig, M. (2014). Transferring Methods to New Contexts. In J. Simonsen, C. Svabo, S. M. Strandvad, K. Samson, & M. Hertzum, (Eds.), Situated Design Methods (pp. 357–376). Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., & Banks, R. (2010). Passing on & putting to rest: Understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. Paper presented at Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1831–1840). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pitsillides, S. (2017). Digital death: The materiality of co-crafted legacies (doctoral dissertation). London: Goldsmiths, University of London. Retrieved from: http://research.gold.ac.uk/22959/
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. (2005). New media, new craft. Paper presented at Proceedings of the international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 157–159). Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, J. & Carroll, E. (2011). Your digital afterlife: when facebook, flickr and twitter are your estate, what's your legacy? Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. (2015). Dead matter: The meaning of Iconic corpses. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telier, A., Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design Things. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Uriu, D., & Okude, N. (2010, August). ThanatoFenestra: Photographic family altar supporting a ritual to pray for the deceased. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 422–425). Aarhus, Denmark: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. (2007). Emotionally charged: A practice-centerd enquiry of digital jewellery and personal emotional significance (doctoral dissertation). Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.467.1168&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., & Press, M. (2004). All this useless beauty: The case for craft practice in design for a digital age. The Design Journal, 7, 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (1996). A new model of grief: Bereavement and biography. Mortality, 1, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (2008). The presence of the dead in society. Paper presented at Conference on Death & Dying in 18-21c Europe, Alba Iulia, Romania.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T., Hourizi, R., Moncur, W., & Pitsillides, S. (2012). Does the internet change how we die and mourn? Overview and analysis. Omega – Journal of Death and Dying, 64, 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (2013). Do modern societies comprise the dead as well as the living? CDAS Working Paper Series – CDAS-001-0113. [Online] Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/cdas/documents/cdas_working_paper_cdas-001-0113.pdf
   Google Scholar