1
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Factor Structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory

&
Pages 77-83 | Published online: 13 Jul 2018

REFERENCES

  • Belcher, M.J., Crocker, L.M., & Algina, J. (1984). Can the same instrument be used to measure sex role perceptions of males and females? Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 17, 15–23.
  • Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
  • Bem, S.L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.
  • Bem, S.L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047–1054.
  • Berzins, J.I. (1975, August). New perspectives on sex roles and personality dimensions. In R. Bednar (Chair), Sex roles: Masculine, feminine, androgynous or none of the above? Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
  • Bledsoe, J.C. (1983). Factorial validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 55–58.
  • Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
  • Cliff, N., & Hamburger, C.D. (1967). The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 430–445.
  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.
  • Edwards, T.A., Gaa, J.P., & Liberman, D. (1978, August). A factor analysis of the BSRI and the PAQ. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 187)
  • Feather, N.T. (1978). Factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Implications for the study of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. Australian Journal of Psychology, 30, 241–254.
  • Gaudreau, P. (1977). Factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 299–302.
  • Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gross, R., Batlis, N., Small, A., & Erdwins, C. (1979). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1122–1124.
  • Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161.
  • Heilbrun, A.B. (1984). Sex-based models of androgyny: A further cognitive elaboration of competence differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 216–229.
  • Hoferek, M.J. (1981). Factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory using data from physical educators. Unpublished manuscript. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 221 603)
  • Johnson, M.M. (1963). Sex role learning in the nuclear family. Child Development, 34, 319–333.
  • Kaiser, H.F., Hunka, S., & Bianchini, J. (1969). Relating factors between studies based upon different individuals. In H.J. Eysenck & S.B.G. Eysenck (Eds.), Personality structure and measurement (pp. 333–343). San Diego: Knapp.
  • Kelly, J.A., & Worell, J. (1977). New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1101–1115.
  • Koenigsberg, E. (1982, March). Perceptual-cognitive structure of sex-typed traits: Multidimensional scaling of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 322)
  • Linn, R.L. (1968). A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem. Psychometrika, 33, 37–72.
  • Marsh, H.W., & Myers, M. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: A methodogolical and theoretical critique. Unpublished manuscript. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242 758)
  • Megargee, E.I. (1972). The California Psychological Inventory handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mills, C.J. (1980, April). A factor-analytic comparison of two measures of masculinity-femininity in post and early adolescent populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Hartford (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 189 495)
  • Moreland, J.R., Gulanick, N., Montague, E.K., & Harren, V.A. (1978). Some psychometric properties of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 249–256.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R.F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Pedhazur, E.J., & Tetenbaum, T.J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.
  • Powell, G.N. (1979, September). Factor analysis of the BSRI revisited: A comprehensive study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
  • Ruch, L.O. (1984). Dimensionality of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 10, 99–117.
  • Sassenrath, J.M., & Yonge, G.D. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory reexamined. Psychological Reports, 3, 935–941.
  • Taylor, D. (1984). Concurrent validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A person-environment approach. Sex Roles, 10, 713–723.
  • Thompson, B., & Pitts, M.C. (1981). The use of factor adequacy coefficients. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 101–104.
  • Wakefield, J.A., Sasek, J., Friedman, A.F., & Bowden, J.D. (1976). Androgyny and other measures of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 766–770.
  • Waters, C.W., Waters, L.K., & Pincus, S. (1977). Factor analysis of mascuhne and feminine sex-typed items from the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.
  • Wheeless, V.E., & Dierks-Stewart, K. (1981). Communication Quarterly, 29, 173–186.
  • Whetton, C., & Swindells, T. (1977). A factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 150–153.
  • Worell, J. (1978). Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 777–791.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.