Advanced search
Publication Cover
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Volume 32, 1999 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
19
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
METHODS, PLAINLY SPEAKING

An Overview of Meta-Analysis

William D. Schafer William D. Schafer is an associate professor in measurement, statistics, and evaluation at the University of Maryland, College Park.Correspondence[email protected]
Pages 43-61 | Published online: 29 Aug 2019

REFERENCES

  • Arnold, C. L. (1992). An introduction to hierarchical linear models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 58–90.
  • Becker, B. J. (1994). Combining significance levels. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 215–230). New York: Sage.
  • Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399–409). New York: Sage.
  • Bracht, G. H., & Glass, G. V. (1968). The external validity of experiments. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 437–474.
  • Bushman, B. J. (1994). Vote-counting procedures in meta-analysis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 193–213). New York: Sage.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage.
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245–260). New York: Sage.
  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Gleser, L. J., & Olkin, I. (1994). Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 339–355). New York: Sage.
  • Harwell, M. (1997). An empirical study of Hedges's homogeneity test. Psychological Methods, 2, 219–231.
  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285–299). New York: Sage.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lipsey, M. W. (1994). Identifying potentially interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 111–123). New York: Sage.
  • Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 432–458.
  • Mann, C. C. (1994). Can meta-analysis make policy? Science, 266, 960–962.
  • Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows base system user's guide release 6.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
  • Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139–162). New York: Sage.
  • Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301–321). New York: Sage.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Sage.
  • Schafer, W. D. (1993). Interpreting statistical significance and nonsignificance. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 383–387.
  • Snow, R. E. (1974). Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 44, 265–291.
  • Stock, W. A. (1994). Systematic coding for research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 125–138). New York: Sage.
  • Thompson, B. (1988). Discarding variance: A cardinal sin in research. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 3–4.
  • Tracz, S. M., Elmore, P. B., & Pohlmann, J. T. (1992). Correlational meta-analysis: Independent and nonindependent cases. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 879–888.
  • Wortman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 97–109). New York: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.