Establishing the Factor Structure of the 18-Item Version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

References

• Allen, K. D., & Hancock, T. E. (2008). Reading comprehension improvement with individualized cognitive profiles and metacognition. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• American School Counselor Association. (2014). The professional school counselor and LGBTQ youth. Alexandra, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, U., & Ubuz, B. (2010). Turkish Version of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory: The Validation Study. Eǧitim ve Bilim, 35(157), 30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404.
   Google Scholar
• Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third grade students. Reading Teacher, 61, 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brigman, G. A., Webb, L. D., & Campbell, C. (2007). Building skills for school success: Improving the academic and social competence of students. Professional School Counseling, 10, 279–288.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1998). Thinking about thinking: Developing metacognition in children. Early Child Development and Care, 141(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J., Miller, P., & Miller, S. (1993). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kirbulut, Z. D. (2014). Modeling the relationship between high school students’ chemistry self-efficacy and metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9, 177–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemberger, M. E., & Clemens, E. V. (2012). Connectedness and self-regulation as constructs of the Student Success Skills program in inner-city African American elementary school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90, 450–458.
   Google Scholar
• Lemberger, M. E., Selig, J. P., Bowers, H., & Rogers, J. E. (2015). Effects of the Student Success Skills program on executive functioning skills, feelings of connectedness, and academic achievement in a predominantly Hispanic, low-income middle school district. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1996). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition. Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampton, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159–194.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, A. (2008). Promoting a culture of thinking in the young child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 457–461.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Richmond, A. S., Ramsay, C. M., & Klapp, M. (2012). The measurement and predictive ability of metacognition in middle school learners. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K., Nailor, P., & Carey, J. C. (2014). Achieving excellence: Reframing the discussion on school counseling student standards. New York, NY: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314.
   Google Scholar
• Villares, E., Frain, M., Brigman, G., Webb, L., & Peluso, P. (2012). The impact of student success skills on standardized test scores: A meta-analysis. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 3, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., & Fry, J. (2012). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar