References
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Balkin, R. S. (2017). Evaluating evidence regarding relationships with criteria. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336928
- Betz, N., & Taylor. (2012). Career decision self-efficacy scale. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
- Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2015). Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Frisch, M. B. (1994). Quality of life inventory: Manual and treatment guide. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
- Hays, D. G. (2017). Assessment in counseling: Procedures and practices (6th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
- Lawley, D. (1943–1944). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formula. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 62(Section A), 28–30.
- Lewis, T. F. (2017). Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929
- Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2014). Validity in educational & psychological assessment. London, UK: Cambridge Assessment/Sage.
- Pearson, K. (1903). On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlations of organs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 200(Series A), 1–66.
- Pfaffel, A., Kollmayer, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2016). A missing data approach to correct for direct and indirect range restrictions with a dichotomous criterion: A simulation study. PLoS ONE, 11, e0152330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152330
- Reynolds, C. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2013). Bias in psychological assessment: An empirical review and recommendations. In J. R. Graham, J. A. Naglieri, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 10: Assessment psychology (2nd ed., pp. 82–113). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Spurgeon, S. L. (2017). Evaluating the unintended consequences of assessment practices: Construct irrelevance and construct underrepresentation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1339563
- Thorndike, R. L. (1947). Research problems and techniques (Report No. 3). Washington, DC: AAF Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Van der Ark, L. A. (2012). New developments in Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i05
- Van der Elst, W., Hoogenhout, E. M., Dixon, R. A., De Groot, R. H. M., & Jolles, J. (2011). The Dutch Memory Compensation Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and regression-based norms. Assessment, 18, 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110370116
- Watson, J. C. (2017). Establishing evidence for internal structure using exploratory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336931
- Wiberg, M., & Sundström, A. (2009). A comparison of two approaches to correction of restriction of range in correlation analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, 1–9.
- Zachary, R. A., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1985). Continuous norming: Implications for the WAIS–R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198501)41:1<86::AID-JCLP2270410115>3.0.CO;2-W