A Rasch Analysis of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory With Singapore Students

References

• Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0902_3
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, U., & Ubuz, B. (2010). Structural model of metacognition and knowledge of geometry. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326548
   Google Scholar
• Bode, R. K., & Wright, B. D. (1999). Rasch measurement in higher education. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XIV, pp. 287–316). Bronx, NY: Agathon. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3955-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 367–406). New York, NY: Halsted.
   Google Scholar
• Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1995). Effects of metacognitive instruction on low achievers in mathematics problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00019-3
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Kurtz, B. E., Schneider, W., Turner, L. A., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989). Strategy acquisition and transfer among American and German children: Environmental influences on metacognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 25, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.765
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–69). London, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• de Jager, B., Jansen, M., & Reezigt, G. (2005). The development of metacognition in primary school learning environments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450500114181
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213–245). Ayphen & Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijtoff & Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016282811724
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1998). Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 266–283.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2010). When to stop removing items and persons in research misfit analysis? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 23, 1241.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2013). Winsteps 3.80.1 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsud, M. (1997). Effects of metacognitive skills and nonverbal ability on academic achievement in high school pupils. Educational Psychology, 17, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170402
   Google Scholar
• Meloth, M. S. (1990). Changes in poor readers' knowledge of cognition and the association of knowledge of cognition with regulation of cognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.792
   Google Scholar
• Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.363-376
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. J., & Erdos, G. (1993). Strategy selection and metacognition. Educational Psychology, 13, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341930130304
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Olafson, L., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognitive knowledge and field-based science learning in an outdoor environmental education program. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 57–77). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_4
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. (2004). Detecting item bias with the Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 430–449.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306
   Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2008). Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
   Google Scholar