Gender-Linked Differences in Informal Argument: Analyzing Arguments in an Online Newspaper

References

• Adrianson , L. and Hjelmquist , E. 1991 . Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. . Behaviour and Information Technology , 10 : 281 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language . 2004 . , , 4th Ed. Houghton Mifflin Company . Retrieved August 21, 2005, from Answers.com database
   Google Scholar
• Aries , E. 1996 . Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Auld , F. Jr. and White , A. M. 1956 . Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. . Journal of Psychology , 42 : 273 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar , M. 1999 . Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An implication of rhetorical structure theory. . Argumentation , 13 : 97 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Baird , J. E. Jr. 1976 . Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 62 : 179 – 192 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassart , D. G. 1996 . Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 years olds. . Argumentation , 10 : 163 – 174 .
   Google Scholar
• Brem , S. K. and Rips , L. J. 2000 . Explanation and evidence in informal argument. . Cognitive Science , 24 : 573 – 604 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell , K. K. 1973 . The rhetoric of women's liberation: An oxymoron. . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 59 : 74 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell , K. K. 1989 . Man cannot speak for her: A critical study of early feminist rhetoric Vol. 1 , New York : Greenwood Press .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. 1992 . Manual for coding conversational argument Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens, OH
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Dindia , K. , eds. 1998 . Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction Mahwah, NJ : Earlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Hause , K. S. 1993 . Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? . Communication Quarterly , 41 : 129 – 144 .
   Google Scholar
• Caplan , P. J. 1979 . “ Beyond the box score: A boundary condition for sex differences in aggression and achievement striving. ” . In Progress in experimental personality research, Vol 1 Edited by: Maher , B. 41 – 87 . New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cargile , A. C. 1998 . Meanings and modes of friendship: Verbal descriptions by native Japanese. . The Howard Journal of Communication , 9 : 347 – 370 .
   Google Scholar
• Crammond , J. G. 1998 . The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. . Written Communication , 15 : 230 – 268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford , M. 1995 . Talking difference: On gender and language London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Dearin , R. D. 1982 . “ Perelman's concept of “quasi-logical argument”: A critical elaboration. ” . In Advances in argumentation theory and research Edited by: Cox , J. R. and Willard , C. A. 78 – 94 . Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dow , B. and Tonn , M. B. 1993 . 'Feminine style' and political judgment in the rhetoric of Ann Richards. . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 79 : 286 – 302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick , M. A. and Mulac , A. 1995 . “ Relating spouse and stranger: Gender-preferential language use. ” . In Gender, power, and communication in human relationships Edited by: Kalbfleisch , P. J. and Cody , M. J. 213 – 231 . Hillsdale, NJ : Earlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Foss , S. K. and Griffin , C. L. 1995 . Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. . Communication Monographs , 62 : 2 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith , D. J. and Fulfs , P. A. 1999 . “You just don't have the evidence”: An analysis of claims and evidence in Deborah Tannen's ” . In You just don't understand Edited by: Roloff , M. 1 – 49 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage . In Communication Yearbook 22)
   Google Scholar
• Hall , E. T. 1981 . Beyond culture New York : Doubleday .
   Google Scholar
• Hall , J. A. 1984 . Nonverbal sex differences: Accuracy of communication and expressive style Baltimore, MD : TheJohns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Halliday , M. A. K. 1996 . An introduction to functional grammar, , 2nd ed. New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Hanai , H. July 26 2004 . “ Lifting women's job status. ” . In The Japan Times July 26 , Retrieved December 28, 2004, from LexisNexis database
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield , J. D. and Weider-Hatfield , D. 1978 . The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. . Communication Monographs , 45 : 44 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden , S. 1997 . Re-claiming bodies of knowledge: An exploration of the relationship between feminist theorizing and feminine style in the rhetoric of the Boston Women's Health Book Collective. . Western Journal of Communication , 61 : 127 – 163 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays , J. N. and Brandt , K. S. 1992 . “ Socio-cognitive development and students' performance on audience-centered argumentative writing. ” . In Constructing rhetorical education Edited by: Secor , M. and Charney , D. 202 – 229 . Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Inoue , M. 2003 . Speech without a speaking body: “Japanese women's language” in translation. . Language and Communication , 23 : 315 – 330 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese women becoming more empowered . July 17 2004 . Mainichi Daily News July 17 , Retrieved December 28, 2004, from LexisNexis database
   Google Scholar
• Japanese Statistics Bureau, Ministry of General Affairs . 2002 . Results of 2001 survey on people's living in Japanese society Retrieved December 28, 2004, from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/shokai/2001/topics/tps0211/htm
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn , D. 1991 . The skills of argument Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff , R. 1973 . Language and woman's place. . Language in Society , 2 : 45 – 79 .
   Google Scholar
• Le Ny , J. F. 1989 . Science cognitive et comprehension du language Paris : PUF .
   Google Scholar
• Lunsford , A. A. and Ruszkiewicz , J. J. 2001 . Everything's argument Boston, MA : Bedford/St. Martin's .
   Google Scholar
• Maltz , D. N. and Borker , R. A. 1982 . “ A cultural approach to male-female communication. ” . In Language and social identity Edited by: Gumperz , J. J. 196 – 216 . New York : Cambridge .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Brashers , D. E. , Winston , L. and Grob , L. 1997 . Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. . Communication Studies , 48 : 19 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy , J. 1989 . “ Gender differences in information processing. ” . In Cognitive and affective responses to advertising Edited by: Cafferata , P. and Tybout , A. M. 214 – 260 . Lexington, MA : Lexington Books .
   Google Scholar
• Mulac , A. , Bradac , J. J. and Gibbons , P. 2001 . Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. . Human Communication Research , 27 : 121 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomares , N. A. 2004 . Gender schematicity, gender identity salience, and gender-linked language use. . Human Communication Research , 30 : 556 – 588 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman , C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca , L. M. 1969 . The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation Edited by: Wilkinson , J. and Weaver , P. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press .
   Google Scholar
• Reinard , J. C. 1991 . Foundations of argument: Effective communication for critical thinking Dubuque, IA : Wm. C. Brown Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Saeki , M. and O'Keefe , B. 1994 . Refusals and rejections: Designing messages to serve multiple goals. . Human Communication Research , 21 : 67 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia , M. , Bereiter , C. and Goelman , H. 1982 . The function of explicit discourse knowledge in the development of text representations and composing strategies. . Cognition and Instruction , 2 : 1 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Simosi , M. 2003 . Using Toulmin's framework for the analysis of everyday argumentation: Some methodological considerations. . Argumentation , 7 : 185 – 202 .
   Google Scholar
• Stein , N. L. and Miller , C. A. 1993 . A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference judgments of goodness memory and reasoning. . Argumentation , 7 : 183 – 204 .
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , S. 2000 . “Hiratsuka's Editor's Introduction to the First Issue of Seito”: Where “Feminine Style” intersects discourse of high-context communication. . Women's Studies in Communication , 23 : 182 – 208 .
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki , S. 2005 . “ Analyzing structural features of informal argument. ” . In Critical problems in argumentation Edited by: Willard , C. A. 587 – 597 . Annandale, VA : National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Tannen , D. 1990 . You just don't understand: women and men in conversation New York : Ballantine .
   Google Scholar
• Treichler , P. and Kramarae , C. 1983 . Women's talk in the ivory tower. . Communication Quarterly , 31 : 118 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Warnick , B. and Inch , E. S. 1989 . Critical thinking and communication New York : Macmillan Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Warnick , B. and Manusov , V. 2000 . The organization of justificatory discourse in interaction: A comparison within and across cultures. . Argumentation , 14 : 381 – 404 .
   Google Scholar
• Werder , A. V. 1999 . Argumentation rationality of management decisions. . Organization Science , 10 : 672 – 690 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild , A. April 28 2004 . “ The land of the rising glass ceiling: Why do so few women win places in Japanese boardrooms? The men can't stand being outclassed. ” . In The Herald (Glasgow) April 28 , Retrieved December 28, 2004, from LexisNexis database
   Google Scholar