Shaming Jane: A Feminist Foucauldian Analysis of How College Students Employ the Sexual Double Standard in Peer Interventions

References

• Abbey, A. (2002). Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 118–128. doi:10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbey, A. (2011). Alcohol's role in sexual violence perpetration: Theoretical explanations, existing evidence, and future directions. Drug & Alcohol Review, 30, 481–489. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbey, A., Saenz, C., & Buck, P. O. (2005). The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 22, 82–90. doi:10.15288/jsa.2005.66.82
   Google Scholar
• Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women's orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(3), 22–27. doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.3.22.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 463–481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartky, S. L. (1997). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In D. T. Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 93–111). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, B. J., Gohm, C. L., & Gross, A. M. (2007). College women and sexual assault: The role of sex-related alcohol expectancies. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 341–351. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9085-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordo, S. (2003). The body and the reproduction of femininity: Reconstructing feminist discourse on the body. In M. S. Kimmel and A. Aronson (Eds.), The gendered society reader (2nd ed., pp. 309–326). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, S. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779–792. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (2005). Keeping the “lady” safe: The regulation of femininity through crime prevention literature. Critical Criminology, 13, 119–140. doi:10.1007/s10612-005-2390-z
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). CDC fact sheet: 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/STDs-Women-042011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement No. 14, 101–117. doi:10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.101
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, D. M. (2013). Strategic ambiguity: Protecting emphasized femininity and hegemonic masculinity in the hookup culture. Gender & Society, 27, 704–727. doi:10.1177/0891243213493960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donat, P. L. N., & D'Emilio, J. (1992). A feminist redefinition of rape and sexual assault: Historical foundations and change. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 9–22. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, C., & Upchurch, D. M. (2006). Moderating effects of gender on alcohol use: Implication for condom use at first intercourse. Journal of School Health, 76, 111–116. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00078.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2007). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today's college campuses. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (pp. 531–546). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• England, P., & Thomas, R. J. (2006). The decline of the date and the rise of the college hook up. In A. Skolnick (Ed.), The family in transition (pp. 69–78). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 77–89. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2012). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young Black women in the US. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 170–183. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.716874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (trans. R. Hurley). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline, & punish: The birth of the prison (trans. A. Sheridan). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self (trans. R. Hurley). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984, in The final Foucault: Studies on Michel Foucault's last works. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin H. Gutman & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fugère, M. A., Escoto, C., Cousins, A. J., Riggs, M. L., & Haerich, P. (2008). Sexual attitudes and double standards: A literature review focusing on participant gender and ethnic background. Sexuality & Culture, 12, 169–182. doi:10.1007/s12119-008-9029-7
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2011). The next problem with no name: The politics and pragmatics of the word rape. Women's Studies in Communication, 34, 42–63. doi:10.1080/07491409.2011.566533
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/089124320934582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynie, M., & Lydon, J. E. (1995). Women's perceptions of female contraceptive behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 563–581. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00093.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. M., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women's talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133. doi:10.1080/00224490309552174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, L. C., Stewart, L. O., Bates, C., Greenberg, J., LeGreco, M., & Schuwerk, T. J. (2007). LET'S TALK ABOUT IT. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Communication and Health Issues, Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, B. C. (2002). Alcohol and condom use: A meta-analysis of event-level studies. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sex Behavior, 41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women's bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793–804. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lunceford, B. (2008). The walk of shame: A normative description. ETC: A review of General Semantics, 65, 319–29.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). The impact of social interaction on the sexual double standard. Social Influence, 2, 29–54. doi:10.1080/15534510601154413
   Google Scholar
• Menegatos, L., Lederman, L. C., & Hess, A. (2010). Friends don't let Jane hook up drunk: A qualitative analysis of participation in a college drinking simulation. Communication Education, 59, 374–388. doi:10.1080/03634521003628909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegatos, L., Savage, M., & Roberto, A. (2011, November). When do friends prevent friends from hooking up drunk?: The effects of gender and intoxication on college students’ use of interpersonal protective behaviors. Paper presented at the National Communication Association convention, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368. doi:10.1080/00224499909552008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2001). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12, 63–83. doi:10.1300/J056v13n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of sexual behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, B. (2012, March 2). When did douche become an insult? Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2012/03/matt_taibbi_called_andrew_breitbart_a_douche_when_did_that_become_an_insult_.html
   Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In D. C. Kirkpatrick S. Duck & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 141–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. A., Elliott, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25, 545–568. doi:10.1177/0891243211418642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23, 145–160. doi:10.1177/0891243208330313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Factors influencing university students' explicit and implicit sexual double standards. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 464–476. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.569976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C. M., Noel, N. E., & Maisto, S. A. (2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2766–2775. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., Mysak, K., & Michael, S. (2008). Sexual double standards and sexual transmitted illnesses: Social rejection and stigmatization of women. Sex Roles, 58, 391–401. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9339-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, L. (1999). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trethewey, A. (1999). Disciplined bodies: Women's embodied identities at work. Organization Studies, 20, 423–450. doi:10.1177/0170840699203003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. H., & Malkowski, J. (2014). Communicative challenges of bystander intervention: Impact of goals and message design logic on strategies college students use to intervene in drinking situations. Health Communication, 29, 93–104. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.721335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House Council on Women and Girls. (January, 2014). Rape and sexual assault: A renewed call to action. Retrieved from http://iaclea.org/visitors/about/documents/WhiteHouseCouncil_sexual_assault_report_1-21-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1984). Pregnant embodiment: Subjectivity and alienation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 9, 45–62. doi:10.1093/jmp/9.1.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M., Penhollow, T. M., & Bailey, W. C. (2010). Hooking up and condom provision: Is there a double standard? American Journal of Health Studies, 25, 156–164.
   Google Scholar