Safer Sex Is No Joke: Women’s Condom Use Self-Efficacy

References

• Adelman, M. (1991). Play and incongruity: Framing safe-sex talk. Health Communication, 3(3), 139–155. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0303_1
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Emmers-Sommer, T. M., & Crowell, T. L. (2002). Couples negotiating safer sex behaviors: A meta-analysis of the impact of conversation and gender. In M. Allen, R. W. Priess, B. M. Gayle, and N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 263–279). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Asante, K. O., & Doku, P. N. (2010). Cultural adaptation of the Condom Use Self Efficacy Scale (CUSES) in Ghana. BMC Public Health, 10(227). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, K. S., & Wong, N. C. H. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of adult play in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 9, 279–286. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baele, J., Dusseldorp, E., & Maes, S. (2001). Condom-use self-efficacy: Effect on intended and actual condom use in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28(5), 421–432. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00215-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baisley, M. C., & Grunberg, N. E. (2019). Bringing humor theory into practice: An interdisciplinary approach to online humor training. New Ideas in Psychology, 55(December), 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior, 31(2), 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth‐Butterfield, S., & Booth‐Butterfield, M. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. Southern Journal of Communication, 56(3), 205–218. doi:10.1080/10417949109372831
   Google Scholar
• Bradney, P. (1957). The joking relationship in industry. Human Relations, 10(2), 179–187. doi:10.1177/001872675701000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brafford, L. J., & Beck, K. H. (1991). Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health, 39(5), 219–225. doi:10.1080/07448481.1991.9936238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cann, A., Davis, H. B., & Zapata, C. L. (2011). Humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1), 1–20. doi:10.1515/humr.2011.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, A., & Matson, C. (2014). Sense of humor and social desirability: Understanding how humor styles are perceived. Personality and Individual Differences, 66(August), 176–180. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.029
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A., McNair, L. D., Corbin, W. R., & Williams, M. (1999). Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: The influence of negotiation styles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 25(3), 217–225. doi:10.1080/00926239908403996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2017. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Martin, R. A. (2007). A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. International Journal of Health, 20(3), 215–234. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2007.011
   Google Scholar
• Coffelt, T. A. (2018). Sexual goals, plans, and actions: Toward a sexual script emerging adults use to delay or abstain from sexual intercourse. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 416–438. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1400095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C., Stappenbeck, C. A., Norris, J., George, W. H., Jacques, A. J., Schraufnagel, T. J., & Kajumulo, K. F. (2014). Young men’s condom use resistance tactics: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 454–465. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.776660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiDonato, T. E., & Jakubiak, B. K. (2016). Strategically funny: Romantic motives affect humor style in relationship initiation. European Journal of Psychology, 12(3), 390–405. doi:10.5964/ejop.v12i13.1105
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., Beckford, S. T., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2007). Sexual scripts of women: A longitudinal analysis of participants in a gender-specific HIV⁄STD prevention intervention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 269–279. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9092-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 150–158. doi:10.1080/00224490509552268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, K. T. H., & Holtzman, S. (2013). Understanding humor styles and well-being: The importance of social relationships and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 53–58. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen, J. M., Adler, N., Gurvey, J. E., Dunlop, M. B., Millstein, S. G., & Tschann, J. (2002). Improving predictions of condom behavioral intentions with partner-specific measures of risk perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 648–663. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00235.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagen, J. L., & Anderson, P. B. (2012). Constructing masculinity in response to women’s sexual advances. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 261–270. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9851-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falanga, R., De Caroli, M. E., & Sagone, E. (2014). Humor styles, self-efficacy, and prosocial tendencies in middle adolescents. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 214–218. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.243
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M. A., & Meston, C. M. (2006). Predictors of condom use self-efficacy in an ethnically diverse university sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(3), 313–326. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9027-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 455–474. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. D., & Carey, M. P. (1998). Measuring self-efficacy in the context of HIV risk reduction: Research challenges and recommendations. Health Psychology, 17(6), 559–568. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.17.6.559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. D., Carey, M. P., & Fuqua, R. W. (1997). Evaluation of the validity of the Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES) in young men using two behavioral simulations. Health Psychology, 16(2), 175–178. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, H., & Kitzinger, C. (2001). Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation. Theory and Psychology, 11(2), 209–232. doi:10.1177/0959354301112004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glebatis Perks, L. (2012). The ancient roots of humor theory. Humor, 25(2), 119–132. doi:10.1515/humor-2012-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53(3–4), 239–251. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (2013). Humor in long-term romantic relationships: The association of general humor styles and relationship-specific functions with relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 77(3), 272–292. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.757796
   Google Scholar
• Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Côté, S., & Wiener, S. (1998). Relational scripts and women’s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 370–380. doi:10.1080/00224499809551955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. (2014). Condom use self-efficacy and HIV risk practices among men who use the Internet to find male partners for unprotected sex. American Journal of Men’s Health, 8(3), 190–204. doi:10.1177/1557988313492172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, N. A., & Leite, C. (2010). Personality impressions associated with four distinct humor styles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00734.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 251–254. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBelle, S., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Weber, K. (2013). Humorous communication and its effectiveness in copying with interpersonal transgressions. Communication Research Reports, 30(3), 221–229. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.806256
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, B. H. (2010). What verbal and nonverbal communication cues lead to sex?: An analysis of the traditional sexual script. Communication Quarterly, 58, 297–318. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.503161
   Google Scholar
• Lannutti, P. J., & Faulkner, S. L. (2016). Everyday experiences of people in same-sex relationships. In J. Manning and C. M. Noland (Eds.), Contemporary studies of sexuality and communication: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 263–274). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, D. (1995). Sexual communication in the age of AIDS: The construction of risk and trust among young adults. Social Science and Medicine, 41(9), 1311–1323. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00010-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Samp, J. A. (2019). Sexual relationship power, safer sex communication, and condom use: A comparison of heterosexual young men and women. Western Journal of Communication, 83(1), 58–74. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1398835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 15–60). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A., Lastuk, J. M., Jeffery, J., Vernon, P. A., & Veselka, L. (2012). Relationships between dark triad and humor styles: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 178–182. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marziali, E., McDonald, L., & Donahue, P. (2008). The role of coping humor in the physical and mental health of older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 12(6), 713–718. doi:10.1080/13607860802154374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb.00194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott, A. E., & Linder, A. (2013). Romantic partners’ use of facework and humor to communicate about sex. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 14(1), 69–78. doi:10.1080/17459435.2013.835344
   Google Scholar
• Nesoff, E. D., Dunkle, K., & Lang, D. (2016). The impact of condom use negotiation self-efficacy and partnership patterns on consistent condom use among college-educated women. Health Education and Behavior, 43(1), 61–67. doi:10.1177/1090198115596168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oncale, R. M., & King, B. M. (2001). Comparisons of men’s and women’s attempts to dissuade sexual partners from the couple using condoms. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(4), 379–391. doi:10.1023/A:1010209331697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peasant, C., Parra, G. R., & Okwumabua, T. M. (2015). Condom negotiation: Findings and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 470–483. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.868861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2011). Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(Suppl. 5), 266–276. doi:10.1111j.1743-6109.2010.02017.x
   Google Scholar
• Ritchwood, T. D., Penn, D., Peasant, C., Albritton, T., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2017). Condom use self-efficacy among younger rural adolescents: The influence of parent–teen communication, and knowledge of and attitudes toward condoms. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(2), 267–283. doi:10.1177/0272431615599065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., & Frieze, I. (1993). Young singles’ contemporary dating scripts. Sex Roles, 28(9–10), 499–509. doi:10.1007/BF00289677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Franzetta, K., Manlove, J., & Holcombe, E. (2007). Adolescents’ discussions about contraception or STDs with partners before first sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(3), 149–157. doi:10.1363/3914907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safren, S. A., Blashill, A. J., Lee, J. S., O’Cleirigh, C., Tomassili, J., Biello, K. B., Mimiaga, M. J., & Mayer, K. H. (2018). Condom-use self-efficacy as a mediator between syndemics and condomless sex in men who have sex with men (MSM). Health Psychology, 37(9), 820–827. doi:10.1037/hea0000617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles, J. N., Petitifor, A., Wong, M. D., MacPhail, C., Lee, S. J., Hendriksen, E., Rees, H. V., & Coates, T. (2010). Factors associated with self-efficacy for condom use and sexual negotiation among South African youth. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 43(2), 226–233. doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000230527.17459.5c
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, R., Boehmer, S., Luszczynska, A., Mohamed, N. E., & Knoll, N. (2005). Dispositional self-efficacy as a personal resource factor in coping after surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(4), 807–818. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 90–132. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. doi:10.1007/BF01542219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A. (2003). Partner influence on noncondom use: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of Sex Research, 40(4), 346–350. doi:10.1080/00224490209552200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soet, J. E., Dilorio, C., & Dudley, W. N. (1998). Women’s self-reported condom use: Intra and interpersonal factors. Women and Health, 27(4), 19–32. doi:10.1300/J013v27n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southam, M. (2005). Humor development: An important cognitive and social skill in the growing child. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25(1–2), 105–117. doi:10.1080/J006v25n01_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, D., & Eaton, A. (2014). The influence of masculinity scripts on heterosexual Hispanic college men’s perceptions of female-initiated sexual coercion. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15(4), 387–396. doi:10.1037/a0034639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagalidou, N., Loderer, V., Distlberger, E., & Laireiter, A. R. (2018). Feasibility of a humor training to promote humor and decrease stress in a subclinical sample: A single-arm pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 577–587. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitelman, A. M., Tennille, J., Bohinski, J. M., Jemmott L. S., & Jemmott, J. B. (2011). Unwanted unprotected sex: Condom coercion by male partners and self-silencing of condom negotiation among adolescent girls. Advances in Nursing Science, 34(3), 243–259. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e31822723a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treise, D., & Weigold, M. F. (2001). AIDS public service announcements: Effects of fear and repetition on predictors of condom use. Health Marketing Quarterly, 18(3–4), 39–61. doi:10.1300/J026v18n03_05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uddin, M. (1996). College women’s sexuality in an era of AIDS. Journal of American College Health, 44(6), 252–261. doi:10.1080/07448481.1996.9936852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallade, J. I., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Vela, L. E. (2013). Taking back power: Using superiority theory to predict humor use following a relational transgression. Western Journal of Communication, 77(2), 231–248. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.669018
   Google Scholar
• Vela, L. E., Booth-Butterfield, M., Wanzer M. B., & Vallade, J. I. (2013). Relationships among humor, relationship stress, and satisfaction in dating relationships: Replication and extension. Communication Research Reports, 30(1), 68–75. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.746224
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1996). Are funny people popular? An examination of humor orientation, loneliness, and social attraction. Communication Quarterly, 44(1), 42–52. doi:10.1080/01463379609369999
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (2005). “If we didn’t use humor, we’d cry”: Humorous coping communication in health care settings. Journal of Health Communication, 10(2), 105–125. doi:10.1080/10810730590915092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch-Cline, R. J., Johnson, S. J., & Freeman, K. E. (1992). Talk among sexual partners about AIDS: Interpersonal communication for risk reduction or risk enhancement? Health Communication, 4(1), 39–56. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0401_4
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. doi:10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2015). Sexual script theory. In J. DeLameter and R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 7–22). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J., & Eisenbraun, A. J. (2009). Humor theories and the physiological benefits of laughter. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 24, 8–12. doi:10.1097/HNP.0B013E3181BF37AD
   PubMedGoogle Scholar