References
- Ahmed, S. (2010a). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Duke University Press.
- Ahmed, S. (2010b). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press.
- Ahmed, S. (2013, September 11). Making feminist points. Feministkilljoys. https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points
- Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
- Ahmed, S. (2017a, November 10). Complaint as diversity work. Feministkilljoys. https://feministkilljoys.com/2017/11/10/complaint-as-diversity-work
- Ahmed, S. (2017b). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
- Ahmed, S. (2019). A complaint biography. Biography, 42(3), 514–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/bio.2019.0057
- Alcoff, L. M. (2010). Epistemic identities. Episteme, 7 (2), 128–136.
- Barnett, J. T. (2019). A certain fidelity to infidelity: Thinking against loyalty in the academy. Women & Language, 42(1), 145–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.34036/WL.2019.015
- Baugh-Harris, S., & Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2018). Against canon: Engaging the imperative of race in rhetoric. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(4), 337–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2018.1526386
- Berlant, L. (Ed.). (2004). Compassion. Routledge.
- Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
- Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. A. (1994). Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80(4), 383–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384084
- Calafell, B. M. (2012). Monstrous femininity: Constructions of women of color in the academy. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(2), 111–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912443382
- Calafell, B. M., & Moreman, S. T. (2009). Envisioning an academic readership: Latina/o performativities per the form of publication. Text and Performance Quarterly, 29(2), 123–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10462930902774833
- Campbell, K. K. (1988). What really distinguishes and/or ought to distinguish feminist scholarship in communication studies? Women’s Studies in Communication, 11(1), 4–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1988.11089711
- Capuzza, J. C. (2014). Who defines gender diversity? Sourcing routines and representation in mainstream U.S. news stories about transgenderism. International Journal of Transgenderism, 15(3/4), 115–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2014.946195
- Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
- Chemaly, S. (2018). Rage becomes her: The power of women’s anger. Atria Books.
- Condit, C. M. (1988). What makes our scholarship feminist? A radical/liberal view. Women’s Studies in Communication, 11(1), 6–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1988.11089712
- Condit, C. M. (1996). How bad science stays that way: Brain sex, demarcation, and the status of truth in the rhetoric of science. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26(4), 83–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02773949609391080
- Condit, C. M. (2018). Angry public rhetorics: Global relations and emotion in the wake of 9/11. University of Michigan Press.
- Cooper, B. (2018). Eloquent rage: A black feminist discovers her superpower. St. Martin’s Press.
- Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Duke University Press.
- Delgado, R. (1984). The imperial scholar: reflections on a review of civil rights literature. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132(3), 561–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3311882
- Elia, J., & Yep, G. (2012). Sexualities and genders in an age of neoterrorism. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(7), 879–889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.699826
- Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Sage Publications.
- Ellingson, L. L. (2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. Routledge.
- Ellingson, L. L., & Ellis, C. (2008). Autoethnography as constructionist project. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 445–465). Guilford Press.
- Flores, L. A. (2016). Between abundance and marginalization: The imperative of racial rhetorical criticism. Review of Communication, 16(1), 4–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2016.1183871
- Foss, S. K., & Foss, K. A. (1988). What distinguishes feminist scholarship in communication studies? Women’s Studies in Communication, 11(1), 9–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1988.11089713
- Foster, E., & Bochner, A. P. (2008). Social constructionist perspectives in communication research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 85–106). Guilford Press.
- Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, USA.
- Gilmore, L. (2017). Tainted witness: Why we doubt what women say about their lives. Columbia University Press.
- Griffin, R. A. (2012). I am an angry black woman: Black feminist autoethnography, voice, and resistance. Women’s Studies in Communication, 35(2), 138–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2012.724524
- Halberstam, J. (2017). Trigger happy: From content warning to censorship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 42(2), 535–542.
- Hendrix, K. G. (2001). “Mama told me…”: Exploring childhood lessons that laid a foundation for my “endarkened” epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(5), 559–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700503
- Hendrix, K. G. (2002). “Did being black introduce bias into your study?”: Attempting to mute the race-related research of black scholars. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(2), 153–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170290089935
- Hendrix, K. G.. (2005). An invitation to dialogue: Do communication journal reviewers mute the race-related research of scholars of color? Southern Communication Journal, 70(4), 329–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940509373338
- Hendrix, K. G., & Wilson, C. (2014). Virtual invisibility: Race and Communication Education. Communication Education, 63(4), 405–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.934852
- Hill Collins, P. (2017). Intersectionality and epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 115–124). Routledge.
- hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
- Houston Stanback, M. (1988). What makes scholarship about Black women and communication feminist communication scholarship? Women’s Studies in Communication, 11(1), 28–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1988.11089718
- Howes, M., & Hundleby, C. (2018). The epistemology of anger in argumentation. Symposion, 5(2), 229–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/symposion20185218
- Ivy, V. (2017). Allies behaving badly: Gaslighting as epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 167–174). Routledge.
- Ivy, V. (2019). Gaslighting as epistemic violence: “Allies,” mobbing, and complex posttraumatic stress disorder, including a case study of harassment of transgender women in sport. In B. R. Sherman & S. Goguen (Eds.), Overcoming epistemic injustice: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 285–301). Routledge.
- Jaggar, A. M. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. Inquiry, 32(2), 151–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185
- Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., & Pohlhaus, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. Routledge.
- Kulbaga, T. A. (2008). Pleasurable pedagogies: “Reading Lolita in Tehran” and the rhetoric of empathy. College English, 70(5), 506–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25472286
- Kulbaga, T. A., & Spencer, L. G. (2019). Campuses of consent: Sexual and social justice in higher education. University of Massachusetts Press.
- Landau, J. (2016). Feeling rhetorical critics: Another affective-emotional field method for rhetorical studies. In S. L. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. R. Chávez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 72–85). Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Landau, J., & Keeley-Jonker, B. (2018). Conductor of public feelings: An affective-emotional rhetorical analysis of Obama’s national eulogy in Tucson. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104(2), 166–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1447138
- Langton, R. 2010. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Hypatia, 25(2), 459–464.
- LeMaster, B. (2020). Notes on some especially (not so) subtle dissatisfactions. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 7(1), 75. doi:https://doi.org/10.14321/qed.7.1.0075
- LeMaster, B., & Johnson, A. L. (2019). An ode to incoherent canons. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 8(4), 57–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.57
- Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Crossing Press.
- Maitra, I. (2010). The nature of epistemic injustice. Philosophical Books, 51(4), 195–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.2010.00511.x
- Manning, J., & Kunkel, A. (2013). Researching interpersonal relationships: Qualitative methods, studies, and analysis. Sage.
- McWeeny, J. (2014). Liberating anger, embodying knowledge: A comparative study of María Lugones and Zen Master Hakuin. In J. McWeeny & A. Butnor (Eds.), Asian and feminist philosophies in dialogue: Liberating traditions (pp. 123–143). Columbia University Press.
- Mejia, R. (2020). Forum introduction: Communication and the politics of survival. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(4), 360–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829657
- Melnick, R. S. (2020, June 11). Analyzing the Department of Education’s final Title IX rules on sexual misconduct. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/analyzing-the-department-of-educations-final-title-ix-rules-on-sexual-misconduct
- Miller, L. J. (2018). Building a trans scholarly archive. Women & Language, 41(1), 152–154.
- Morris, C. E. III, & Palczewski, C. H. (2014). Sexing communication: Hearing, feeling, remembering sex/gender and sexuality in the NCA. In P. J. Gehrke & W. M. Keith (Eds.), A century of Communication Studies: The unfinished conversation (pp. 128–165). Routledge.
- Ngai, S. (2007). Ugly feelings. Harvard University Press.
- Olson, L. C. (2011). Anger among allies: Audre Lorde’s 1981 Keynote admonishing the National Women’s Studies Association. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(3), 283–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2011.585169
- Patterson, G. (2018). Entertaining a healthy cispicion of the ally industrial complex in transgender studies. Women & Language, 41(1), 146–151.
- Patterson, G., & Spencer, L. G. (2020). Toward trans rhetorical agency: A critical analysis of trans topics in rhetoric and composition and communication scholarship. Peitho, 22(4). https://cfshrc.org/article/toward-trans-rhetorical-agency-a-critical-analysis-of-trans-topics-in-rhetoric-composition-and-communication-scholarship/
- Pham, V. N. (2019). The threat of #RhetoricNotSoWhite. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 489–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1669894
- Pohlhaus, G. (2012). Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: Toward a theory of willful hermeneutical ignorance. Hypatia, 27(4), 715–735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x
- Ray, V. (2018, April 27). The racial politics of citation. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/04/27/racial-exclusions-scholarly-citations-opinion
- Repko, A. F. (2013). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage.
- Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2020). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Sage.
- Salzano, M. (2020). Lemons or Lemonade? Beyoncé, killjoy style, and neoliberalism. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(1), 45–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1696434
- Scott, K. D. (2018). Check yo’ stuff: A Black feminist rant to “allies” seeking “dialogue” in precarious times. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(2), 198–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2018.11.2.198
- Spencer, L. G. (2015). Introduction: Centering transgender studies and gender identity in communication scholarship. In L. G. Spencer & J. C. Capuzza (Eds.), Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories (pp. ix–xxii). Lexington Books.
- Spencer, L. G. (2020). Embodied queer theology in Showtime’s Queer as Folk. Argumentation and Advocacy, 56(2), 79–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1709773
- Spencer, L. G., & Capuzza, J. (2016). Centering gender identity and transgender lives in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 65(1), 113–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1096949
- Spencer, L. G., & Capuzza, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories. Lexington Books.
- Spencer, L. G., & Kulbaga, T. A. (2018). Trigger warnings as respect for student boundaries in university classrooms. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 15(1), 106–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2018.1438936
- Spencer, L. G., & Kulbaga, T. A. (forthcoming). Consent education as active allyship: A call for centering trans and queer experiences. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking.
- Spencer, L. G., & Patterson, G. (2017). Abridging the acronym: Neoliberalism and the proliferation of identitarian politics. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(3), 296–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2017.1324343
- Spencer, L. G., & Phillips Buchberger, M. (2018). (Inter)disciplinary transgressions: Feminism, communication, and critical interdisciplinarity. In J. C. Dunn & J. Manning (Eds.), Transgressing feminist theory and discourse: Advancing conversations across disciplines (pp. 16–30). Routledge.
- Springer, S. (2016). Fuck neoliberalism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(2), 285–292.
- Tarin, C. A., Hernández, L. H., Upton, S. D., & Sowards, S. K. (2019). Across bridges and islands: Borderlands perspectives on merit, whiteness, and privilege. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 8(4), 69–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2019.8.4.69
- Traister, R. (2018). Good and mad: The revolutionary power of women’s anger. Simon & Schuster.
- Wanzer-Serrano, D. (2019). Rhetoric’s rac(e/ist) problems. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 465–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1669068
- Winderman, E. (2014). S(anger) goes postal in The Woman Rebel: Angry rhetoric as a collectivizing moral emotion. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 17(3), 381–420. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.2014.0040
- Winderman, E. (2019). Anger’s volumes: Rhetorics of amplification and aggregation in #MeToo. Women’s Studies in Communication, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2019.1632234
- Wood, J. T. (1988). Feminist scholarship in communication: Consensus, diversity, and conversation among researchers. Women’s Studies in Communication, 11(1), 22–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1988.11089717