Diffractive Menstruation: Toward a Technical-Rhetorical Perspective of Menstrual Health Technologies

References

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. (1994). Translating science to the people: Updating the new Our Bodies, Ourselves. Women’s Studies International Forum, 17(1), 9–18. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, E. (2019, September 28). Once a rite of passage for girls, menstruation booklets are now a look back at evolving cycle about hygiene. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/once-a-rite-of-passage-for-girls-menstruation-booklets-are-now-a-look-back-at-evolving-cycle-about-hygiene/2019/09/27/6d3e0bce-dfbe-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third-wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brumberg, J. J. (1993). “Something happens to girls”: Menarche and the emergence of the modern American hygienic imperative. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 4(1), 99–127. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3704181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullough, V. L. (1985). Merchandising the sanitary napkin: Lillian Gilbreth’s 1927 survey. Signs, 10(3), 615–627. doi:10.1086/494174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. (2021). Rhetorical body work: Professional embodiment in health provider education and the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1804620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. (1873). Sex in education; or, A fair chance for the girls. James R. Osgood and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2000). Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 261–284). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Durack, K. (1997). Gender, technology, and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 249–260. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0603_2
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, A. (1987). Society writes biology/Biology constructs gender. Daedalus, 116(4), pp. 61–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20025124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley, H. (2016). 23 years of the Museum of Menstruation and Women’s Health. http://mum.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Freidenfelds, L. (2009). The modern period: Menstruation in twentieth-century America. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, E. (2016). Apparent feminism as a methodology for technical communication and rhetoric. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(1), 3–28. doi:10.1177/10506519156022 10.1177/1050651915602295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, E., & Eble, M. (2015). Technical rhetorics: Making specialized persuasion apparent to public audiences. Present Tense Journal, 4(2). https://www.presenttensejournal.org/volume-4/technical-rhetorics-making-specialized-persuasion-apparent-to-public-audiences/
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2018). The promise and peril of scientific science studies. Theory & Event, 21(2), 529–538.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., & Herndl, C. (2013). Multiple ontologies in pain management: Toward a postplural rhetoric of science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 103–125. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.733674
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Feminism, materialism, and freedom. In D. Coole and S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 139–157). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunson, J. S. (2016). Nature, menstrual suppression, and the value of material feminism. Health Sociology Review, 25(3), 312–325. doi:10.1080/14461242.2016.1198982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurowitz, M. (2008, February 7). The product that dared not speak its name. Kilmer House, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. https://www.kilmerhouse.com/2008/02/the-product-that-dared-not-speak-its-name
   Google Scholar
• Hallenbeck, S. (2012). Toward a posthuman perspective: Feminist rhetorical methodologies and everyday practices. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15, 9–27. doi:10.1080/15362426.2012.657044
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promise of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In J. Womack (Ed.), Cybersexualities: A reader on feminist theory, cyborgs, and cyberspace (pp. 314–366). Edinburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, J. (2016). Leviathan and the breast pump: Toward an embodied rhetoric of wearable technology. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 207–221. doi:10.1080/02773945.2016.1171691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G. (2010). Sorting out the question of feminist technology. In. L. Layne, S. Vostral, & K. Boyer (Eds.), Feminist technology (pp. 36–54). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson. (2021). Timeline of our story. https://ourstory.jnj.com/sanitary-napkinsladies
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. (2016). Narrative inquiry in human-centered design: Examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 471–492. doi:10.1177/0047281616653 10.1177/0047281616653489
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Moore, K. & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberly-Clark Corporation. (1948). Very personally yours. International Cellucotton Production Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kinny, J. (Director). (1946). The story of menstruation [film]. Walt Disney.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, A. (2000). Toward a feminist rhetoric of technology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 58–73. doi:10.1177/105065190001400 10.1177/105065190001400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamo, L., & Fosket, J. R. (2009). Scripting the body: Pharmaceuticals and the (re)making of menstruation. Signs, 34(4), 925–949. doi:10.1086/597191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (1992). The end of the body? American Ethnologist, 19(1), 121–140. doi:10.1525/ae.1992.19.1.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbourne, C., & Hallenbeck, S. (2013). Gender, material chronotopes, and the emergence of the eighteenth-century microscope. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 43(5), 401–424. doi:10.1080/02773945.2013.828096
   Google Scholar
• Olzendiel, R. (2004). Making technology masculine: Women and modern mechanics in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. J., & Walton, R. (2018). Bridging analysis and action: How feminist scholarship can inform the social justice turn. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(4), 416–446. doi:10.1177/1050651918780192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabrina. (2013, June 24). Femme focus: The history of the sanitary pad. Femme International. https://femmeinternational.org/the-history-of-the-sanitary-pad/
   Google Scholar
• Shiff, S. G. (1905). Catamenial garment, 833, 849. U.S. Patent Office.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (2019). “Like regular underwear, but so much better”: How Thinx can create feminist embodied subjects through the enduring legacy of OBOS. Peitho, 21(3), 676–689.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, B. (2009). Moored metamorphoses: A retrospective essay on feminist science studies. Signs, 34(4), 951–980. doi:10.1086/597147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinh, M. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vostral, S. (2008). Under wraps: A history of menstrual hygiene. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. S. (2013). Repunctuated feminism: Marketing menstrual suppression through the rhetoric of choice. Women’s Studies in Communication, 36(3), 267–287. doi:10.1080/07491409.2013.829791
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2005). Throwing like a girl: “Throwing like a girl” and other essays. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar