Gender, Creativity and Education in Digital Musics and Sound Art

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1995). User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. In A. Rip, T. Misa, & J. Schot (Eds.), Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment (pp. 167–184). London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, V. (2011). Technology and the gendering of music education. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K., Brennna, B., & Moser, I. (Eds.). (2007). Technoscience: The politics of intervention. Oslo: Unipub.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2005). Pharmaceutical matters: The invention of informed materials. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1177/0263276405048433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2013). Material politics: Disputes along the pipeline. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bayton, M. (1998). Frock rock: Women performing popular music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V. (2007). Culture and performance: The challenge of ethics, politics and feminist theory. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2006). Participation. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (1995). Rationalizing culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the institutionalization of the musical avant-garde. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2005). On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-Century Music, 2(1), 7–36. doi: 10.1017/S147857220500023X
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2010). On Tardean relations: Temporality and ethnography. In M. Candea (Ed.), The social after Gabriel Tarde: Debates and assessments (pp. 242–244). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2011). Music and the materialization of identities. Journal of Material Culture, 16(4), 376–388. doi: 10.1177/1359183511424196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2012). Music and the social. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Milddleton (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (2nd ed., pp. 267–268). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G. (2013). On music and politics: Henry Cow, avant-gardism and its discontents. In R. Adlington (Ed.), Red strains: Music and communism outside the communist bloc (pp. 55–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G., & Devine, K. (2015). Music technology, gender and class: Digitization, educational and social change in Britain. Twentieth-Century Music, 12(2), 135–172. doi: 10.1017/S1478572215000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma, H. (2016). Gender and technological failures in glitch music. Contemporary Music Review, 35(1), 102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. (2000). Mapping biodiversity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(8), 739–754. doi: 10.1080/136588100750022769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, M. (1993). Gender and the musical canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Essl, G. (2003). On gender in new music interface technology. Organised Sound, 8(1), 19–30. doi: 10.1017/S1355771803001031
   Google Scholar
• Everrett, T. (2014). Ears wide shut: Headphones and moral design (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia, R. (2012). Beyond the dance floor: Female DJs, technology, and electronic dance music culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(1), 79–95. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadir, T. (2016). Resistence or reiteration? Rethinking gender in DJ cultures. Contemporary Music Review, 35(1), 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. (1997). Music, gender, education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L. (2012). Music education, cultural capital, and social group identity. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Milddleton (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (2nd ed., pp. 206–216). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1995). On some failures of nerve in constructivist and feminist analyses of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20(3), 286–310. doi: 10.1177/016224399502000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 117–127). London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouseTM. In Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse^TM: Feminism and technoscience (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. (1989). An intermediary between production and consumption: The producer of popular music. Science, Technology and Human Values, 14(4), 400–424. doi: 10.1177/016224398901400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagesen, V. A. (2012). Reassembling gender: Actor-network theory (ANT) and the making of the technology in gender. Social Studies of Science, 42(3), 442–448. doi: 10.1177/0306312712437078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, C. (2016). Sound::gender::feminism::activism: Research and challenges to the orthodoxies of sound arts. Contemporary Music Review, 35(1), 32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, L. (2010). ‘One equal music’: An exploration of gender perceptions and the fair assessment by beginning music teachers of musical compositions. Music Education Research, 12(2), 141–149. doi: 10.1080/14613801003746592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. (2007). Gender in the music industry: Rock, discourse and girl power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. (2015). Gender and sexuality. In J. Shepherd & K. Devine (Eds.), The Routledge reader on the sociology of music (pp. 181–189). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. (2007). Feminist studies of science and technology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, M. (2005). On the political: Thinking in action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2007). Artistic activism and agonistic spaces. Art and Research, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/pdfs/mouffe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norman, S.J. (2016). Mothers of invention: An afterword. Contemporary Music Review, 35(1), 150–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormrod, S. (1995). Feminist sociology and methodology: Leaky black boxes in gender/technology relations. In K. Grint & R. Gill (Eds.), The gender–technology relation: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 146–173). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N. (2003). Clinical trials as a cultural niche in which to configure the gender identities of users: The case of male contraceptive development. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 209–227). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, A. (2015). Heart feminism. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 1(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, R., & Shaw, C. (2015, January 5). ‘Philosophy is for posh, white boys with trust funds’: Why are there so few women? The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, J., Metcalf, J., Kenney, M., & Barad, K. (2015). Science and justice: The trouble and the promise. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 1(1), 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. (2013). The Wire 300: Simon Reynolds on the hardcore continuum: Introduction. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from http://www.thewire.co.uk/in-writing/essays/the-wire-300_simon-reynolds-on-the-hardcore-continuum_introduction
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, T. (2010a). Pink noises: Women on electronic music and sound. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, T. (2010b). Synthesizing sound: Metaphor in audio-technical discourse and synthesis history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Schep, D. (2012). The limits of performativity: A critique of hegemony in gender theory. Hypatia, 27(4), 864–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F. (2010). (Extended) footnotes on education. e-flux, journal #14, 9 pp. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/extended-footnotes-on-education/
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. (2012). MP3: The meaning of a format. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J., & Leach, J. (2006). The point of social construction and the purpose of social critique. Social Epistemology, 19(2–3), 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, C. (2016). ‘Beyond the dance floor’? Gendered publics and creative practices in electronic dance music. Contemporary Music Review, 35(1), 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straw, W. (1997). Sizing up record collections: Gender and connoisseurship in rock music culture. In S. Whitely (Ed.), Sexing the groove: Popular music and gender (pp. 3–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sturman, S. (2006). On black-boxing gender: Some social questions for Bruno Latour. Social Epistemology, 20(2), 181–184. doi: 10.1080/02691720600784428
   Google Scholar
• Théberge, P. (1997). Any sound you can imagine: Making music/consuming technology. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valiquet, P. (2013). Unpublished contribution to the Gender Panel, at the ‘Music, Digitisation, Mediation’ conference, St Anne's College, Oxford, UK (July).
   Google Scholar
• Valiquet, P. (2014). ‘The digital is everywhere’: Negotiating the aesthetics of digital mediation in Montreal’s electroacoustic and sound art scenes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. doi: 10.1177/0162243905285847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152. doi: 10.1093/cje/ben057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. (2015). Gut feminism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 18(3), 362–378. doi: 10.1177/016224399301800306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 58–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar