Clinicians and individuals with acquired brain injury perspectives about factors that influence mobility: creating a core set of mobility domains among individuals with acquired brain injury

References

• Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):728–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil M, Gupta A, Khanna M, et al. Cognitive and functional outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury: a prospective follow-up study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017;8(03):357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakaran V. Non-communicable diseases in India: transitions, burden of disease and risk factors-A short story. India Health Beat. 2012;6(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(4):1080–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers-Richards T-TA. Risk factors, trends, health care and general life satisfaction for select neurological conditions among an aging population. Saskatchewan, CA: University of Saskatchewan; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift AG, Thayabaranathan T, Howard G, et al. Global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke. 2017;12(1):13–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han P, Zhang W, Kang L, et al. Clinical evidence of exercise benefits for stroke. Exercise for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 131–151.
   Google Scholar
• Wein T, Lindsay MP, Côté R, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: secondary prevention of stroke, sixth edition practice guidelines, update 2017. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(4):420–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniño A, Murphy S, Xu J, et al. Deaths: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;59(10):1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed Ludin S, Abdul Rashid N. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after severe traumatic brain injury: a review. Clin Nurs Res. 2020;29(7):433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten AC, Haagsma JA, Andriessen TMJC, et al. Health-related quality of life after mild, moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: patterns and predictors of suboptimal functioning during the first year after injury. Injury. 2015;46(4):616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Matsuda PN, et al. Understanding physical factors associated with participation in community ambulation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(12):1033–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polinder S, Haagsma JA, van Klaveren D, et al. Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome. Popul Health Metr. 2015;13:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H-J, Oh D-W, Choi J-D, et al. Action observation training of community ambulation for improving walking ability of patients with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):1078–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2014; 383(9913):245–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(11):1610–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May D, Nayak U, Isaacs B. The life-space diary: a measure of mobility in old people at home. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7(4):182–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peel C, Baker PS, Roth DL, et al. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB study of aging life-space assessment. Phys Ther. 2005;85(10):1008–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Patla AE, Stewart A, et al. Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. Phys Ther. 2002;82(7):670–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalvey BT, Owsley C, Sloane ME, et al. The life space questionnaire: a measure of the extent of mobility of older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 1999;18(4):460–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai L-T. Walking, physical activity and life-space mobility among older people. Stud Sport Phys Educ Health. 2017;254:13–65.
   Google Scholar
• Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH. Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist. 2010;50(4):443–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: ICF; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Ailshire JA, Bader M, et al. Mobility disability and the urban built environment. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(5):506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel CL, Carlson NE, Bosworth M, et al. The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(4):461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy MA, Resteghini C, Feys P, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnik JM, Branch LG, Cummings SR, et al. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol. 1989;44(5):M141–M146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Assessing physical performance in independent older adults: issues and guidelines. J Aging Phys Act. 1997;5(3):244–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1S):S5–S12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallik S, Samson RS, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al. Imaging outcomes for trials of remyelination in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(12):1396–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber SC, Porter MM. Monitoring mobility in older adults using global positioning system (GPS) watches and accelerometers: a feasibility study. J Aging Phys Act. 2009;17(4):455–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical outcome assessment (COA): glossary of terms. Drug development tools qualification programs. Silver Spring,MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Andrich D. ISOQOL dictionary of quality of life and health outcomes measurement. International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kinalski DDF, Paula CC, Padoin SMM, et al. Focus group on qualitative research: experience report. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(2):424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Krueger RA. Analyzing and reporting focus group results. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter C. Using qualitative focus groups to evaluate health programmes and service delivery. Qualitative research in evidence-based rehabilitation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004. p. 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 2007;395.
   Google Scholar
• Woodyatt CR, Finneran CA, Stephenson R. In-person versus online focus group discussions: a comparative analysis of data quality. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(6):741–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegler MC, Beasley DD, Liang S, et al. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to understand safety net health system efforts to increase colorectal cancer screening rates. Health Educ Res. 2018;33(4):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triangulation Data Source. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545–547.‏
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi P, Abib G, Hoppen N. Validity in qualitative research: a processual approach. TQR. 2019;24(1):98–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wood LM, Sebar B, Vecchio N. Application of rigour and credibility in qualitative document analysis: lessons learnt from a case study. TQR. 2020; 25(2):456–470.
   Google Scholar
• Muchada M, Rubiera M, Rodriguez-Luna D, et al. Baseline national institutes of health stroke scale-adjusted time window for intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke . Stroke. 2014;45(4):1059–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena JH, Sanchez AI, Rubiano AM, et al. Effect of the modified Glasgow coma scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow coma scale score model scores of 13. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1185–1193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Tistad M, Koch L, et al. The importance of patient involvement in stroke rehabilitation. PLOS One. 2016;11(6):e0157149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien EC, Xian Y, Fonarow GC, et al. Clinical commentary on “certain uncertainty: life after stroke from the patient’s perspective”. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(6):970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan S, Pappadis MR, Weller SC, et al. Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(12):1401–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole E, Stubbs B, Roskell C, et al. The patient’s experience of the psychosocial process that influences identity following stroke rehabilitation: a metaethnography. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ. Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. Motivation and self-regulated learning. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 123–152.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen RL. Perceptions and expectations of patients regarding a new rehabilitation model to encompass the vision of the new health plan 2030; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira CM, Greenwood N, Jones F. From recovery to regaining control of life–the perspectives of people with stroke, their carers and health professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(20):2897–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorley C, Cahill S, Tunariu A, et al. Impact of stroke: a functional, psychological report of an inner-city multiracial population. Primary Health Care. 2014;24(4):26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock C, Eng J, Garland S. Clinical measurement of walking balance in people post stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(8):693–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge S, Stott NS. Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(3):189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bloemendaal M, van de Water AT, van de Port IG. Walking tests for stroke survivors: a systematic review of their measurement properties. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2207–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti K, Björklund Carlstedt A, Clasen R, et al. Impacts of goal setting on engagement and rehabilitation outcomes following acquired brain injury: a systematic review of reviews. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;19:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant SE, Tyson SF, Kirk S, et al. What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and Meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(9):921–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan A. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(6):501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjörk EK, Gunnel C, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, et al. Experiences, needs, and preferences for follow-up after stroke perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals: a focus group study. PLOS One. 2019;14(10):e0223338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):100–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Ells C, Thombs BD, et al. Defining elements of patient-centered care for therapeutic relationships: a literature review of common themes. EJPCH. 2017;5(3):362–372.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson EJ, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, et al. “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fix GM, VanDeusen Lukas C, Bolton RE, et al. Patient‐centred care is a way of doing things: how healthcare employees conceptualize patient‐centred care. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):300–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell DL, Martin R, Surgenor LJ, et al. Wrestling with uncertainty after mild traumatic brain injury: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(14):1942–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(0):135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistarini C, Aiachini B, Coenen M, et al. Functioning and disability in traumatic brain injury: the Italian patient perspective in developing ICF core sets. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23–24):2333–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set”–a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17(1):449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani P. Online focus groups. J Advert. 2017;46(1):48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar