2,742
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Relationship between exercise motivation and social support in a support facility for persons with disabilities in Japan

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 820-829 | Received 15 Sep 2021, Accepted 28 Feb 2022, Published online: 14 Mar 2022

References

  • World Health Organization [Internet]. Disability and health. 2021. [cited June]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
  • Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. The 2nd year of reiwa era annual report on government measures for persons with disabilities. Tokyo, Japan: Cabinet Office, Government of Japan; 2020.
  • Teo K, Slark J. A systematic review of studies investigating the care of stroke survivors in long-term care facilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(8):715–723.
  • Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare [Internet]. Disability welfare services. 2020. [cited September]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hukushi_kaigo/shougaishahukushi/service/naiyou.html
  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. [Internet]. Report on the Heisei 30 years project for the promotion of comprehensive welfare for persons with disabilities survey and research on understanding the actual conditions of self-support training. (Functional Training and Daily Living Training). 2019. [cited September]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000194160_00001.html
  • Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(78):78–30.
  • Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(4):495–506.
  • Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, et al. The Pittsburgh rehabilitation participation scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(3):380–384.
  • Kurniawati ND, Rihi PD, Wahyuni ED. Relationship of family and self-efficacy support to the rehabilitation motivation of stroke patients. EurAsian J BioSci 2020;14:2427–2430.
  • Reichardt LA, Aarden JJ, van Seben R, et al. Motivational factors mediate the association of general self-efficacy and performance outcomes in acutely hospitalised older patients. Age Ageing. 2020;49(5):837–842.
  • Guthrie S, Harvey A. Motivation and its influence on outcome in rehabilitation. Rev Clin Gerontol. 1994;4(3):235–243.
  • Kozica-Olenski S, McRae P, Bew P, et al. I will walk out of here’: qualitative analysis of older rehabilitation patients’ perceptions of mobility. Australas J Ageing. 2020; 39(3):209–208.
  • Resnick B. Motivation in geriatric rehabilitation. Image J Nurs Sch. 1996;28(1):41–45.
  • Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, et al. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33(2):444–448.
  • Nicholson S, Sniehotta FF, Van Wijck F, et al. A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(5):357–364.
  • Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. [Internet] Report on Heisei 21 years project for promotion of insurance and welfare for persons with disabilities (Survey and Research Project for Supporting Independence of Persons with Disabilities). 2009. [cited September]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/shougaihoken/cyousajigyou/jiritsushien_project/seika/research_09/
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268.
  • Phillips LA, Johnson MA. Interdependent effects of autonomous and controlled regulation on exercise behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(1):49–62.
  • Ntoumanis N, Ng JYY, Prestwich A, et al. A Meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;0(0):1–31.
  • Thilarajah S, Bower KJ, Pua YH, et al. Modifiable factors associated with poststroke physical activity at discharge from rehabilitation: prospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(9):1876–1889.
  • Kusec A, Velikonja D, Dematteo C, et al. Motivation in rehabilitation and acquired brain injury: can theory help us understand it? Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(19):2343–2349.
  • Stewart KFJ, Meis JJM, van de Bool C, et al. Maintenance of a physically active lifestyle after pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a qualitative study toward motivational factors. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(9):655–664.
  • Yamamoto K, Okumiya A. Factors that promote autonomous and controlled motivation in self-management behavior of hemodialysis patients. J Heal Sci. 2018;6(6):393–405.
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mentalstate: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
  • Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26(2):191–196.
  • Liu L, Xiang M, Guo H, et al. Reliability and validity of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire-2 for nursing home residents in China. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020;14(1):11–16.
  • Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Ntoumanis N. The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(4):393–404.
  • Cid L, Moutão J, Leitão J, et al. Behavioral regulation assessment in exercise: exploring an autonomous and controlled motivation index. Span J Psychol. 2012;15(3):1520–1528.
  • Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The rivermead mobility index: a further development of the rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13(2):50–54.
  • Maeshima S. Development of the Japanese version of the rivermead mobility index and its trial. Sogo Rehabil. 2005;33(9):875–879.
  • Sakano Y, Tohjoh M. The general Self-Efficacy scale (GSES): scale development and validation. Jpn J Behav Ther. 1986;12:73–82.
  • Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41.
  • Iwasa H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the social support scale: a study of Middle-aged and older adults. J Health Welf Statistics. 2007;54(6):26–33.
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model service, its quality and implications for future research. Res Pap. 1985;49(4):41–50.
  • Nakamura A. An empirical study on the measurement scale of service quality: reexamination of SERVQUAL scale. Yokohama J Soc Sci. 2007;11:631–646.
  • Ono M, Takayama T, Kusano E, et al. Peer support among patients and its relationship with mental health—survey on the ostomate. J Jpn Acad Nurs Sci. 2007;27(4):23–32.
  • George D, Mallery P. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
  • Shimizu H. An introduction to the statistical free software HAD: suggestions to improve teaching, learning and practice data analysis. J Media Inf Commun. 2016;1:59–73.
  • Marshall I, Baffour TD. Lives deferred? Exploring social disconnection and perceived quality of life among young adults residing in a long-term care facility. Soc Work Health Care. 2011;50(4):259–273.
  • Proot IM, Abu-Saad HH, De Esch-Janssen WP, et al. Patient autonomy during rehabilitation: the experiences of stroke patients in nursing homes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000;37(3):267–276.
  • Carpenter BD. Family, peer, and staff social support in nursing home patients: contributions to psychological well-being. J Appl Gerontol. 2002;21(3):275–293.
  • Vincent-Onabajo G, Muhammad M, Ali M, et al. Social support after stroke: influence of source of support on stroke survivors’ Health-Related quality of life. Int Neuropsychiatr Dis J. 2016;5(1):1–9.
  • Northcott S, Moss B, Harrison K, et al. A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: associated factors and patterns of change. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(8):811–831.
  • Visser-Meily A, Post M, Gorter JW, et al. Rehabilitation of stroke patients needs a family-centred approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(24):1557–1561.
  • Altintas E, De Benedetto G, Gallouj K. Adaptation to nursing home: the role of leisure activities in light of motivation and relatedness. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;70:8–13.
  • Clark E, MacCrosain A, Ward NS, et al. The key features and role of peer support within group self-management interventions for stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(3):307–316.
  • Thompson SC, Sobolew-Shubin A, Graham MA, et al. Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(3):239–247.
  • Yang SY, Kong KH. Level and predictors of participation in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(10):564–568.
  • Cameron C, Pirozzo S, Tooth L. Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: appropriateness of aged care facilities. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(3):261–264.
  • Shimada H. Self-efficacy evaluation. In: Sakano Y, Maeda M, editors. Clinical psychology of self-efficacy. Kyoto, Japan: Kitaouji Syobo; 2002. p. 4757.