Pre-stroke socioeconomic status predicts upper limb motor recovery after inpatient neurorehabilitation

References

• Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam A-JR, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2468–2481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimäki M, Batty GD, Pentti J, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: a multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(3):e140–e149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube MM, Koennecke H-C, Walter G, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and functional impairment 3 months after ischemic stroke: the Berlin Stroke Register. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3325–3330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contoyannis P, Jones AM. Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle. J Health Econ. 2004;23(5):965–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert T, Kroll LE, von der Lippe E, et al. Sozioökonomischer status und gesundheit: Ergebnisse der studie zur gesundheit erwachsener in deutschland (DEGS1) [Socioeconomic status and health: results of the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56(5–6):814–821.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Addo J, Ayerbe L, Mohan KM, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke: an updated review. Stroke. 2012;43(4):1186–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(2):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall IJ, Wang Y, Crichton S, et al. The effects of socioeconomic status on stroke risk and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(12):1206–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan A, Digaleh H, Di Napoli M, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and worldwide burden: an ecological analysis from the global burden of disease study 2017. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magin P, Victoire A, Zhen XM, et al. Under-reporting of socioeconomic status of patients in stroke trials: adherence to CONSORT principles. Stroke. 2013;44(10):2920–2922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putman K, De Wit L, Schoonacker M, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on functional and motor recovery after stroke: a European multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(6):593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belleudi V, Sciattella P, Agabiti N, et al. Socioeconomic differences in one-year survival after ischemic stroke: the effect of acute and post-acute care-pathways in a cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettger JP, Zhao X, Bushnell C, et al. The association between socioeconomic status and disability after stroke: findings from the adherence evaluation after ischemic stroke longitudinal (AVAIL) registry. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glader E-L, Jonsson B, Norrving B, et al. Socioeconomic factors' effect on return to work after first stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(6):608–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Goffredo M, Pournajaf S, et al. Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients. PLOS One. 2018;13(2):e0193235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda S, Ueba Y, Fukuda H, et al. Impact of upper limb function and employment status on return to work of blue-collar workers after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(8):2187–2192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzan IL, Thompson N, Uchino K. Innovations in stroke: the use of PROMIS and NeuroQoL scales in clinical stroke trials. Stroke. 2016;47(2):e27–e30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmele DL, Lebherz L, Frese M, et al. Health-related quality of life 90 days after stroke assessed by the international consortium for health outcome measurement standard set. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(12):2508–2516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert T, Kroll LE, Müters S, et al. Messung des sozioökonomischen status in der studie "gesundheit in deutschland aktuell" (GEDA) [Measurement of the socioeconomic status within the German health update 2009 (GEDA)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56(1):131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke G, Wolf S, Ingwersen T, et al. Protocol for a multicenter observational prospective study of functional recovery from stroke beyond inpatient rehabilitation – the interdisciplinary platform for rehabilitation research and innovative care of stroke patients (IMPROVE). Neurol Res Pract. 2020;2:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation. Arbeitshilfe für die Rehabilitation von Schlaganfallpatienten. In: Schriftenreihe der bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für rehabilitation; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, et al. Improving modified Rankin scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire. Stroke. 2010;41(5):1048–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42(4):1146–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santisteban L, Térémetz M, Bleton J-P, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLOS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Fu T, Wu C, et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas J, Sprinkhuizen SM, Ackerson T, et al. An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(1):180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapin B, Thompson NR, Schuster A, et al. Clinical utility of patient-reported outcome measurement information system domain scales. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12(1):e004753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subirana I, Sanz H, Vila J. Building bivariate tables: the {compareGroups} package for R [journal of statistical software]; 2014. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v57/i12/.
   Google Scholar
• Rost NS, Bottle A, Lee J-M, et al. Stroke severity is a crucial predictor of outcome: an international prospective validation study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(1):e002433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, et al. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(4):291–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. New York: Academic Press; 1973. p. 105–142.
   Google Scholar
• Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 14: logistic regression. Crit Care. 2005;9(1):112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald A. Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann Math Statist. 1945;16(2):117–186.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version R version 4.0.3. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Version 1.3.1093. Boston (MA): RStudio, PBC; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social; 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot.
   Google Scholar
• John CR. MLeval: machine learning model evaluation; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MLeval.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, Burridge JH., et al. Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke: consensus-based core recommendations from the second stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(11):951–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(Suppl. 1):599–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(11):917–921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3–5):281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Verheyden G, Brinkmann N, et al. Functional and motor outcome 5 years after stroke is equivalent to outcome at 2 months: follow-up of the collaborative evaluation of rehabilitation in stroke across Europe. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1613–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballester BR, Maier M, Duff A, et al. A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2019;122(1):350–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrich J, Müllner M, Lalouschek W, et al. Influence of socioeconomic status and gender on stroke treatment and diagnostics. Stroke. 2008;39(7):2066–2072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapral MK, Wang H, Mamdani M, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1):268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr GD, Slavin H, Clark D, et al. Do vascular risk factors explain the association between socioeconomic status and stroke incidence: a meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcel C, Reeves M. Under-enrollment of women in stroke clinical trials: what are the causes and what should be done about it? Stroke. 2021;52(2):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrutinio D, Battista P, Guida P, et al. Sex differences in Long-Term mortality and functional outcome after rehabilitation in patients with severe stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11:84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo ÉF, Viana RT, Teixeira-Salmela LF, et al. Self-rated health after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmeyer-Slotnik JHP. Demographische standards – Ausgabe 2010: Eine gemeinsame empfehlung des ADM arbeitskreis deutscher markt- und sozialforschungsinstitute e.V., der arbeitsgemeinschaft sozialwissenschaftlicher institute e.V. (ASI) und des statistischen bundesamtes (Statistik und Wissenschaft; Bd. 17). 5th ed. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jöckel K-H, Babitsch B, Bellach BM, et al. Messung und quantifizierung soziographischerMerkmale in epidemiologischen studien. München: MMV Medizin-Verlag; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, et al. Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2005;294(22):2879–2888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof AJ. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1985;15(3):263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer S. Einzelindikator oder index? Masse sozialer differenzierung im vergleich [Single indicator or index? Comparison of measures of social differentiation]. Gesundheitswesen. 2008;70(5):281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert SJ, Kesselring J. Neurorehabilitation of stroke. J Neurol. 2012;259(5):817–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobylańska M, Kowalska J, Neustein J, et al. The role of biopsychosocial factors in the rehabilitation process of individuals with a stroke. Work. 2018;61(4):523–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trygged S, Ahacic K, Kåreholt I. Income and education as predictors of return to working life among younger stroke patients. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennlert J, Asplund K, Glader E-L, et al. Socioeconomic status and the risk of stroke recurrence: persisting gaps observed in a nationwide Swedish study 2001 to 2012. Stroke. 2017;48(6):1518–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar