A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC)

References

• de Silva SR, Riaz Y, Evans JR. Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD008812.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008812.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom M, Barry P, Henry Y, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: guidelines based on data in the European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery database. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(6):1086–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blindness GBD. Vision impairment C, vision loss expert group of the global burden of disease S. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144–e160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JS, Ng JC, Chan VK, et al. Cataract surgery with a new fluidics control phacoemulsification system in nanophthalmic eyes. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016;7(3):218–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuzbasioglu E, Artunay O, Agachan A, et al. Phacoemulsification in patients with nanophthalmos. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44(5):534–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkind WJ. The phaco machine: analysing new technology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(1):41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting DSJ, Rees J, Ng JY, et al. Effect of high-vacuum setting on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(9):1135–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward MS, Georgescu D, Olson RJ. Effect of bottle height and aspiration rate on postocclusion surge in infiniti and millennium peristaltic phacoemulsification machines. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(8):1400–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoli CM, Dimalanta R, Miller KM. Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y-Y, Chang P-J, Yu F, et al. Retinal vessel diameter changes induced by transient high perfusion pressure. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(4):602–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Li X, Tao A, et al. Intraocular pressure and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6):2927–2931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Boulter T, Lambert NG, et al. Intraocular pressure study using monitored forced-infusion system phacoemulsification technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):768–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KD, Lorente R, Fanney D, et al. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):542–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif-Kashani P, Fanney D, Injev V. Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Salinas R, Garza-Leon M, Saenz-de-Viteri M, et al. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-fluidics. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(5):1907–1913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik PK, Dewan T, Patidar AK, et al. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phaco tip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017;4:22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oh LJ, Nguyen CL, Wong E, et al. Prospective study of centurion® versus infiniti® phacoemulsification systems: surgical and visual outcomes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(11):1698–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wang D, Nie L, et al. Early changes in retinal microcirculation after uncomplicated cataract surgery using an active-fluidics system. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(5):1605–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhar S, Sen S, Dhull C. Active-fluidics-based torsional phacoemulsification in diabetic eyes: a prospective interventional study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(5):619–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia X, Wei Y, Song H. Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of the effects of phacoemulsification cataract surgery on macular hemodynamics in Chinese normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(12):4175–4185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Li H, Chen W, et al. Active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC): study protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e059062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison JA, Chylack LT. Clinical application of the lens opacities classification system III in the performance of phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow JM, Grzeda MT, Frost NA, et al. Cat-PROM5: a brief psychometrically robust self-report questionnaire instrument for cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(4):796–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Zhou M, Wang Y, et al. Short-Term changes in retinal vasculature and layer thickness after phacoemulsification surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, et al. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HYY. Effects of gravity fluid flow system and active control fluid flow system on cumulative dissipated energy in post-phacoemulsification vision recovery and corneal endothelium. Rec Adv Ophthalmol. 2019;39(1):68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Yesilirmak N, Diakonis VF, Sise A, et al. Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):16–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhar S, Aron N, Sen S, et al. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Sweeney HW, Luke B, et al. A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:401–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ye H, Lu Y. Corneal bullous epithelial detachment in diabetic cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92(7):e161–e164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He L, Cui Y, Tang X, et al. Changes in visual function and quality of life in patients with senile cataract following phacoemulsification. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(6):3802–3809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino FS, Matteini S, Imburgia A, et al. Torsional phacoemulsification: a pilot study to revise the "harm scale" evaluating the endothelial damage and the visual acuity after cataract surgery. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugod M, Storr-Paulsen A, Norregaard JC, et al. Corneal endothelial cell changes associated with cataract surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cornea. 2011;30(7):749–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne WM. Biology of the corneal endothelium in health and disease. Eye (Lond). 2003;17(8):912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer C, Brezin A, Cochener B, FEMCAT study group, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (FEMCAT): a multicentre participant-masked randomised superiority and cost-effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):212–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CJ, Johnston RL, Buscombe C, United Kingdom Pseudophakic Macular Edema Study Group, et al. Risk factors and incidence of macular edema after cataract surgery: a database study of 81984 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(2):316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Bressler NM. Optical coherence tomography and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(1):46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Liu Q, Yu H, et al. Microvascular changes in macular area after phacoemulsification and its influencing factors assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography. TCRM. 2021; 17:405–414.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Wen W, Jiang C, et al. Changes in macular vasculature after uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery: optical coherence tomography angiography study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(4):453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Frueh BE, Steinmair D, et al. Cataract significantly influences quantitative measurements on swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography imaging. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Guadie A, Feng L, et al. Influence of cataract surgery on macular vascular density in patients with myopia using optical coherence tomography angiography. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(6):1–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križanović A, Bjeloš M, Bušić M, et al. Macular perfusion analysed by optical coherence tomography angiography after uncomplicated phacoemulsification: benefits beyond restoring vision. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton EJR, Hosking SL, Gherghel D, et al. Beneficial effects of small-incision cataract surgery in patients demonstrating reduced ocular blood flow characteristics. Eye (London). 2005;19(6):670–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Azhati G, Li T, et al. Macular vascular density changes following cataract surgery in diabetic patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilotto E, Leonardi F, Stefanon G, et al. Early retinal and choroidal OCT and OCT angiography signs of inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(7):1001–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostaglandins and cystoid macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(Suppl 1):S203–S218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, et al. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for macular edema. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:476525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuenca N, Ortuño-Lizarán I, Sánchez-Sáez X, et al. Interpretation of OCT and OCTA images from a histological approach: clinical and experimental implications. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020;77:100828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HW, Wagh VK, Sullivan DL, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(1):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow JM, Grzeda MT, Frost NA, et al. Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(4):788–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar