Recognition of patients with cardiovascular disease by artificial neural networks

References

• Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel WB. Cardio-vascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1990;121:293–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte H, Assmann G. CHD risk equations, obtained from the Framingham Heart Study, applied to the PROCAM Study. Cardiovasc Risk Factors 1991;1:126–33.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen TF, Davidsen M, Jorgensen HIT, Jensen G, Borch-Johnsen K. A new method for Cl-ID prediction and prevention based on regional risk scores and randomized clinical trials; PRECARD and the Copenhagen Risk Score. J Cardiovasc Risk 2001;8:291–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kwame 0, Akosah MD, Schaper A, Cogbill C, Schoenfeld P. Preventing Myocardial Infarction in the Young Adult in the First Place: How Do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III Guidelines Perform? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1475–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim S, Papacosta 0, Whincup P, Wannamethee G, Walker M, Nicolaides AN, et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women. The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 1999;30:841–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997;96:1432–7.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr. Carotid-artery intima media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340:14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bots ML, Hoes AW, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Grobbee DE. Cross-sectionally assessed carotid intima-media thickness relates to long-term risk of stroke, coronary heart disease and death as estimated by available risk functions. J Intern Med 1999;245:269–76.
   Google Scholar
• Joakimsen 0, Bonaa KH, Mathiesen EB, Stensland-Bugge E, Arnesen E. Prediction of mortality by ultrasound screening of a general population for carotid stenosis: the Tromso Study. Stroke 2000;31: 1871–6.
   Google Scholar
• Balbarini A, Buttitta F, Limbruno U, Petronio AS, Baglini R, Strata G, et al. Usefulness of carotid intima-media thickness measurement and peripheral B-mode ultrasound scan in the clinical screening of patients with coronary artery disease. Angiology 2000;51:269–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Sol Al, Moons KG, Hollander M, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Grobbee DE, et al. Is carotid intima-media thickness useful in cardiovascular disease risk assessment? The Rotterdam Study. Stroke 2001;32:1532–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross SS, Harrison RF, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet 1995;346:1075–9.
   Google Scholar
• Itchhaporia D, Snow P, Almassy R, Oetgen WJ. Artificial neural networks: current status in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:515–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig GS, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ, Martin CM, Robertson JM. Modeling mortality in the intensive care unit: comparing the performance of a back-propagation, associative-learning neural network with multivariate logistic regression. In: Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993:361–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ebell MH. Artificial neutral networks for predicting failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Fam Pract 1993;36:297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PB, Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. J Urol 1994;152:1923–6.
   Google Scholar
• Page MP, Howard RJ, O'Brien JT, Buxton-Thomas MS, Pickering AD. Use of neural networks in brain SPECT to diagnose Alzheimer's disease. J Nucl Med 1996;37:195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins CB, Suleman J, Cook C. An artificial neural network for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2000;28:435–8.
   Google Scholar
• Scott JA, Palmer EL, Fishman A J. How well can radiologist using neural network software diagnose pulmonary embo-lism? Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:399–405.
   Google Scholar
• Finne P, Finne R, Auvinen A, Juusela H, Maattanen L, Hakama M, et al. Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in screen-positive men by a multiplayer perception network. Urology 2000;56:418–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss R, Cullen P, Schulte H, Assmann G. Prediction of risk of coronary events in middle-aged men in the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM) using neural networks. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1253–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxt WG, Shofer FS, Sites FD, Hollander JE. A neural com-putational aid to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:366–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont JL, Carlson LA, Cooper GR, Fejfar Z, Fredrickson DS, Strasser T. Classification of hyperlipidemias and hyper-lipoproteinemias. Bull World Health Organ 1970;43:891–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucolo G, David M. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem 1973;19476–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röschlau P, Bernt E, Gruber W. Enzymatische Bestimmung des Gesamt Cholesterins in Serum. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 1974;12:403–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate preci-pitation procedure for quantitation of high density lipopro-teins. Clin Chem 1982;28:1379–88.
   Google Scholar
• Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plas-ma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarre D, Amato M, Bondioli A, Sirtori CR, Tremoli E. Carotid artery intima-media thickness measured by ultra-sonography in normal clinical practice correlates well with atherosclerosis risk factors. Stroke 2000;31:2426–30.
   Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Theory: Foundation of Artificial Neural Net-works. Subst Use Misuse 1998;33:28–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Back Propagation Neural Networks. Subst Use Misuse 1998;33:233–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, (eds). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Breda M, Buscema M. Recurrent Neural Networks. In Buscema and Semeion Group, Artificial Neural Networks and Social Complex System, Vol. I. Milan: Franco Angeli; 1999:452–64 (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Dietterich TG. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms,. Neural Comput 1998;10:1895–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapuerta P, Azen SP, LaBree L. Use of neural networks in predicting the risk of coronary artery disease. Comput Biomed Res 1995;28:38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Buchman TG, Kubos KL, Seidler AJ, Siegforth M J. A comparison of statistical and connectionist models for the prediction of chronicity in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1994;22:750–62.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hollingsworth H, Zazulia AR, Diringer MN. Artificial neural networks improve the prediction of mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 1999;53:351–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White H. Learning in artificial neural networks: a statistical perspective. Neural Comput 1989;1:425–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton G. How neural networks learn from experience. Sci Am 1992;267:145–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward Systems Group Neuroshell 2. Frederick, MO: Ward Systems Group; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Tu J. Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1225–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A. Artificial intelligence and neural networks: concept, applications and future in urology. Br J Urol 1997;80:53–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohno-Machado L, Rowland T. Neural network applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:392–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bottaci L, Drew PJ, Hartley JE, Hadfield MB, Farouk R, Lee PW, et al. Artificial neural networks applied to outcome prediction for colorectal cancer patients in separate institu-tions. Lancet 1997;350:469–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer JF, von Eye A, Rovine MJ. Assessment of neural network models using prediction analysis. Biomed Sci Instrum 1995;31:25–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriere MR, Detsky AS. Neural networks: what are they? Ann Intern Med 1991;115:906–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Genetic Doping Algorithm. In Buscema and Semeion Group, Artificial Neural Networks and Social Com-plex System, vol. I. Milan: Franco Angeli; 1999:465–86.
   Google Scholar
• Buscema M. Genetic Doping Algorithm (GenD): theory and applications. Expert Systems 2004;2:63–79.
   Google Scholar