371
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effect of information on preferences for improved household water supply in Indonesia and Nepal

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 255-272 | Received 16 May 2021, Accepted 20 Sep 2021, Published online: 01 Nov 2021

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
  • Bach, C., Dauchy, X., Chagnon, M. C., & Etienne, S. (2012). Chemical compounds and toxicological assessments of drinking water stored in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles: A source of controversy reviewed. Water Research, 46(3), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.062
  • Bechtel, M. M., & Scheve, K. F. (2013). Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(34), 13763–13768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306374110
  • Benito, B., Faura, Ú., Guillamón, M. D., & Ríos, A. M. (2019). The efficiency of public services in small municipalities: The case of drinking water supply. Cities, 93(April), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.016
  • Bennear, L., Tarozzi, A., Pfaff, A., Balasubramanya, S., Matin Ahmed, K., & van Geen, A. (2013). Impact of a randomized controlled trial in arsenic risk communication on household water-source choices in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.07.006
  • Bennear, L. S., & Olmstead, S. M. (2008). The impacts of the ‘right to know’: Information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.002
  • Bernauer, T., & Gampfer, R. (2015). How robust is public support for unilateral climate policy? Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.010
  • Berrittella, M., Hoekstra, A. Y., Rehdanz, K., Roson, R., & Tol, R. S. J. (2007). The economic impact of restricted water supply: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Water Research, 41(8), 1799–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.010
  • Bhattacharya, D. (2015). Nonparametric Welfare Analysis for Discrete Choice. Econometrica, 83(2), 617–649. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12574
  • Brown, J., Hamoudi, A., Jeuland, M., & Turrini, G. (2017). Seeing, believing, and behaving: Heterogeneous effects of an information intervention on household water treatment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.08.005
  • Chatterjee, C., Triplett, R., Johnson, C. K., & Ahmed, P. (2017). Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A contingent valuation study in Jacksonville, FL. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.008
  • Dauda, S. A., Yacob, M. R., & Radam, A. (2014). Household’s willingness to pay for heterogeneous attributes of drinking water quality and services improvement: An application of choice experiment. Applied Water Science, 5(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0186-6
  • Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109
  • Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Nghiem, L. D. (2010). The effect of information on public acceptance – The case of water from alternative sources. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1288–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.003
  • Echenique, M., & Seshagiri, R. (2009). Attribute-based willingness to pay for improved water services: A developing country application. Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 36(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33126
  • Erickson, J. J., Smith, C. D., Goodridge, A., & Nelson, K. L. (2017). Water quality effects of intermittent water supply in Arraiján, Panama. Water Research, 114, 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.009
  • Ferraro, P. J., & Miranda, J. J. (2013). Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Resource and Energy Economics, 35(3), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.04.001
  • Fielding, K. S., & Roiko, A. H. (2014). Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water. Water Research, 61, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.002
  • Gampfer, R., Bernauer, T., & Kachi, A. (2014). Obtaining public support for North–South climate funding: Evidence from conjoint experiments in donor countries. Global Environmental Change, 29, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.006
  • Greenberg, M. R. (2014). Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust. Energy Research & Social Science Journal, 1, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004
  • Guragai, B., Takizawa, S., Hashimoto, T., & Oguma, K. (2017). Effects of inequality of supply hours on consumers’ coping strategies and perceptions of intermittent water supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Science of the Total Environment, 599–600, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.182
  • Gurung, Y., Zhao, J., Kumar, K. C. B., Wu, X., Suwal, B., & Whittington, D. (2017). The costs of delay in infrastructure investments: A comparison of 2001 and 2014 household water supply coping costs in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Resources Research, 53(8), 7078–7102. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019529
  • Haider, W., & Rasid, H. (2002). Eliciting public preferences for municipal water supply options. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(4), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00017-3
  • Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multi-dimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. http://web.mit.edu/jhainm/www
  • Haramoto, E., Yamada, K., & Nishida, K. (2011). Prevalence of protozoa, viruses, coliphages and indicator bacteria in groundwater and river water in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 105(12), 711–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.08.004
  • Hensher, D., Shore, N., & Train, K. (2005). Households’ willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(4), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-7686-7
  • Heryawan, I. (2018). Cakupan Layanan PDAM 98 Persen, di Kawasan Khusus Gunakan Master Meter. RRI (Radio Republik Indonesia).  Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://rri.co.id/surabaya/1117-ruang-publik/600960/cakupan-layanan-pdam-98-persen-di-kawasan-khusus-gunakan-master-meter
  • Hninn, S. T., Kawata, K., Kaneko, S., & Yoshida, Y. (2017). A nonparametric welfare analysis via a randomized conjoint field experiment: An application to water quality improvement and the floating settlements on Inlay Lake, Myanmar. IDEC DP 2 Series, 7(3). http://doi.org/10.15027/45447
  • Jalan, J., & Somanathan, E. (2008). The importance of being informed: Experimental evidence on demand for environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.10.002
  • Jiang, Y., & Rohendi, A. (2018). Domestic water supply, residential water use behaviour, and household willingness to pay: The case of Banda Aceh, Indonesia after ten years since the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Environmental Science & Policy, 89(July), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.006
  • Kaneko, S., Kawata, K., & Yoshida, Y. (2016). Understanding job preference among young Japanese workers: Non-parametric conjoint and welfare-analysis. IDEC DP2 Series, 6, 1–19.
  • Katuwal, H., & Bohara, A. K. (2011). Coping with poor water supplies: Empirical evidence from Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Water and Health, 9(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2010.151
  • Khatiwada, N. R., Takizawa, S., Tran, T. V. N., & Inoue, M. (2002). Groundwater contamination assessment for sustainable water supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Science and Technology, 46(9), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0226
  • KUKL. (2016). Institutional capacity assessment of KUKL. Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD), Nepal and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
  • KUKL. (2018). Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepani Limited. Annual Report, 2075. Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepani Limited.
  • Kumar, T., Post, A. E., & Ray, I. (2018). Flows, leaks and blockages in informational interventions: A field experimental study of Bangalore’s water sector. World Development, 106, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.022
  • Madajewicz, M., Pfaff, A., van Geen, A., Graziano, J., Hussein, I., Momotaj, H., Sylvi, R., & Ahsan, H. (2006). Can information alone change behavior? Response to arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 84(2), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.12.002
  • Ojha, R., Thapa, B. R., Shrestha, S., Shindo, J., Ishidaira, H., & Kazama, F. (2018). Water price optimization after the Melamchi Water Supply Project: Ensuring affordability and equitability for consumer’s water use and sustainability for utilities. Water (Switzerland), 10(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030249
  • Pant, B. R. (2011). Ground water quality in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178(1–4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1706-y
  • Pattanayak, S. K., Yang, J. C., Whittington, D., & Bal Kumar, K. C. (2005). Coping with unreliable public water supplies: Averting expenditures by households in Kathmandu, Nepal. Water Resources Research, 41(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002443
  • Rietveld, P., Rouwendal, J., & Zwart, B. (2000). Block rate pricing of water in Indonesia: An analysis of welfare effects. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 36(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910012331338983
  • Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., & Hensher, D. A. (2012). Preferences for tap water attributes within couples: An exploration of alternative mixed logit parameterizations. Water Resources Research, 48(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010148
  • Setiawan, R. P., Kaneko, S., & Kawata, K. (2019). Impacts of pecuniary and non-pecuniary information on pro-environmental behavior: A household waste collection and disposal program in Surabaya city. Waste Management, 89, 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.015
  • Shrestha, S., Aihara, Y., Bhattarai, A. P., Bista, N., Rajbhandari, S., Kondo, N., … Shindo, J. (2017). Dynamics of domestic water consumption in the Urban area of the Kathmandu valley: Situation analysis pre and post 2015 Gorkha Earthquake. Water (Switzerland), 9(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030222
  • Surabaya City Government. (2015). Executive summary – Master plan for drinking water supply system of Surabaya 2015–2035. Surabaya.
  • Van Houtven, G. L., Pattanayak, S. K., Usmani, F., & Yang, J. C. (2017). What are households willing to pay for improved water access? Results from a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 136, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.023
  • Whittington, D., Pattanayak, S. K., Yang, J. C., & Kumar, K. C. B. (2002). Household demand for improved piped water services: Evidence from Kathmandu, Nepal. Water Policy, 4(6), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00040-5
  • Willis, K. G., Scarpa, R., & Acutt, M. (2005). Assessing water company customer preferences and willingness to pay for service improvements: A stated choice analysis. Water Resources Research, 41(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003277

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.