Fixed-Boundary Constituencies and the Principle of Equal Representation in Ireland

References

• Altman, M., Magar, E., McDonald, M.P. & Trelles, A. (2014) The effects of automated redistricting and partisan strategic interaction on representation: the case of Mexico, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 28–31 August. Available SSRN 2486885.
   Google Scholar
• American Political Science Association. (1951) The reapportionment of congress, American Political Science Review, 45(1), pp. 153–157. doi: 10.2307/1950889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balinski, M. (2008) Redistricting in France under changing electoral rules, in: L. Handley & B. Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 173–190 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Balinksi, M.L. & Young, H.P. (2001) Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brunell, T. & Grofman, B. (2008) The partisan consequences of Taylor v. Carr and the one person one vote revolution, in: L. Handley & B. Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 225–236 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cain, B.E. (1984) The Reapportionment Puzzle (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Carstairs, A.M. (1980) A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe (London: George Allen and Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (1979) Spatial units and the reporting of Irish statistical data: the evolution of regional divisions, Administration, 27(1), pp. 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2005) Ireland's unique electoral experiment: the Senate election of 1925, Irish Political Studies, 20(3), pp. 231–269. doi: 10.1080/07907180500359327
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2007) Revising Dáil constituency boundaries: Ireland in comparative perspective, Administration, 55(3), pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2008a) Does Ireland need a constituency commission? Administration, 55(4), pp. 77–114.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2008b) Electoral redistricting in Ireland, in: L. Handley & B. Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 155–172 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2013) Reforming Political Institutions: Ireland in Comparative Perspective (Dublin: Institute of Public Administration).
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, J. (2008) From gerrymanders to independence: district boundary readjustments in Canada, in: L. Handley & B. Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 11–26 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom, R.L. (1987) District magnitudes and the election of women to the Irish Dail, Electoral Studies, 6(2), pp. 123–132. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(87)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, R.L. (2002) The post-2000 round of redistricting: an entangled thicket within the federal system, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32(4), pp. 51–70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. (1983) A methodological note, in: The BBC/ITN Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies, pp. 15–17 (Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services).
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (1975) Disproportionality in a proportional electoral system: the Irish experience, Political Studies, 23(4), pp. 501–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (1986) The political consequences of the electoral system in the Republic of Ireland, Electoral Studies, 5(3), pp. 253–275. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(86)90014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2005) Ireland: the discreet charm of PR-STV, in: M. Gallagher & P. Mitchell (Eds.) The Politics of Electoral Systems, pp. 511–532 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, A. (1963) Congressional Districting: The Issue of Equal Representation (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).
   Google Scholar
• Huckabee, D.C. (2001) The House of Representatives Apportionment Formula: An Analysis of Proposals for Change and their Impact on States (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress); also available at: www.rules.house.gov/archives/RL31074.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1971) Local Government Reorganisation ( Prl. 1572) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1980) Dáil Éireann Constituency Commission: Report ( Prl. 8878) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1983) Dáil Constituency Commission: Report ( Pl. 1774) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1988) Dáil Constituency Commission: Report ( Pl. 5984) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1990) Dáil Constituency Commission: Report ( Pl. 7520) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1995) Dáil Constituency Commission: Report ( Pn. 1619) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (1998) Constituency Commission Report 1998 ( Pn. 5074) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (2004) Constituency Commission: Report on Dáil constituencies 2004 ( Prn. 1554) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (2007) Constituency Commission: Report on Dáil and European Parliament Constituencies 2007 ( Prn. A7/1347) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Ireland. (2012) Constituency Commission Report 2012: Dáil and European Parliament Constituencies 2012 ( Prn. A12/0834) (Dublin: Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., Rossiter, D. & Pattie, C. (2006) The United Kingdom redistribution process, in: L. Handley (Ed.) Delimitation Equity Project: Resource Guide, pp. 337–343 (Washington, DC: IFES).
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, A. (2003) The constituency commission, Irish Political Studies, 18(2), pp. 89–99. doi: 10.1080/1364298042000227677
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, A. (2014) All changed, changed utterly? Irish general election boundary amendments and the 2012 constituency commission report, Irish Political Studies, 29(2), pp. 215–235. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2013.827667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, A. (2015) An end to ‘Civil War politics’? The radically reshaped political landscape of post-crash Ireland, Electoral Studies, 38(1), pp. 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M. & Mair, P. (1975) Proportionality, PR and STV in Ireland, Political Studies, 23(4), pp. 491–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (1986) Districting choices under the single transferable vote, in: Bernard Grofman & Arend Lijphart, (Eds.) Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences, pp. 289–307 (New York: Agathon Press).
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M.P. (2008) United States redistricting: a comparative look at the 50 states, in: Lisa Handley & Bernard Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 55–71 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• McRobie, A. (2006) New Zealand: Drawing electoral districts to guarantee minority representation, in: L. Handley (Ed.) Delimitation Equity Project: Resource Guide, pp. 299–315 (Washington, DC: IFES).
   Google Scholar
• Medew, R. (2008) Redistribution in Australia: The importance of one vote, one value, in: L. Handley & B. Grofman (Eds.) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective, pp. 97–105 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. (2001) Bushmanders and Bullwinkles: How Politicians Manipulate Electronic Maps and Census Data to Win Elections (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., Frank, R.W. & Martínezi Coma, F. (2013) Assessing the quality of elections, Journal of Democracy, 24(4), pp. 124–135. doi: 10.1353/jod.2013.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Cearúil, M. (1999) Bunreacht na hÉireann: A Study of the Irish Text (Dublin: Government Publications, for the All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution).
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, C. (1979) Irish Elections, 1918–77: Parties, Voters, and Proportional Representation (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Pattie, C., Johnston, R. & Rossiter, D. (2012) Change the seats, change the participation? Parliamentary redistricting and constituency turnout, Representation, 48(4), pp. 419–428. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.713870
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., Johnston, R. & Thrasher, M. (2008) Changing the boundaries but keeping the disproportionality: the electoral impact of the fifth periodical reviews by the parliamentary boundary commissions for England and Wales, Political Quarterly, 79(1), pp. 80–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, C. & Thrasher, M. (2007a) British Electoral Facts 1832–2006 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C. & Thrasher, M. (2007b) Media Guide to the New Parliamentary Constituencies (Plymouth: Local Government Chronicle Elections Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Schrott, P. (2006) Case study: Germany, in: L. Handley (Ed.) Delimitation Equity Project: Resource Guide, pp. 245–260 (Washington, DC: IFES).
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M.S. (1994) Minorities represented and unrepresented, in: W. Rule & J.F. Zimmerman (Eds.) Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, pp. 31–41 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, P. (2006) Reapportionment and redistricting in the United States of America, in: L. Handley (Ed.) Delimitation Equity Project: Resource Guide, pp. 345–352 (Washington, DC: IFES).
   Google Scholar
• White, T.J. (2006) Why so few women in Dáil Éireann? The effects of the single transferable vote election system, New Hibernia Review, 10(4), pp. 71–83. doi: 10.1353/nhr.2006.0076
   Google Scholar