Imposed unions and imperfect states: the State Union of Serbia-Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina in comparative perspective

References

• Banac, I. (1988). The national question in Yugoslavia: Origins, history, politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. (2004). Serbien und Montenegro: Provisorium oder Modell des minimalistischen Föderalismus? In Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus-Forschung Tübingen (Ed.), Jahrbuch des Föderalismus (pp. 322–338). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. (2006). Post- War Bosnia. ethnicity, inequality and public sector Governance. Palgrave McMillian: Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. (2011). Building impossible states? State-building strategies and EU membership in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(10), 1783–1802. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.618679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, S. (2002). Bosnia after Dayton. Nationalist partition and international intervention. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative federalism – Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, S. (2000). Serbia and Montenegro: The struggle to Redefine Yugoslavia. European Security, 9(3), 62–86. doi: 10.1080/09662830008407462
   Google Scholar
• Connor, W. (1972). Nation-building or nation-destroying? World Politics, 24(3), 319–355. doi: 10.2307/2009753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daalder, I. (2000). Getting to Dayton – The making of America’s Bosnia Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djilas, A. (1991). The contested country. Yugoslav Unity and Communist Revolution 1919-1953. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duric, D. (2003). The economic development of Montenegro. In F. Bieber (Ed.), Montenegro in transition - problems of identity and statehood (pp. 139–158). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Dzankic, J. (2010). Transformations of Citizenship in Montenegro: A context-generated evolution of citizenship policies. CITSEE Working Paper 2010/03. University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Dzankic, J. (2014a). Reconstructing the meaning of being “Montenegrin”. Slavic Review, 73(2), 347–371. doi: 10.5612/slavicreview.73.2.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzankic, J. (2014b). From creeping to sprinting – The foreign policy of Montenegro. In S. Keil & B. Stahl (Eds.), The foreign policies of Post-Yugoslav States (pp. 173–197). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dzankic, J. (2015). Citizenship in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro: Effects of statehood and identity challenges. Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dzankic, J., & Keil, S. (2018). The Europeanisation of contested states: Comparing Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro. In J. Dzankic, S. Keil, & M. Kmezic (Eds.), The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans – A failure of EU Conditionality (pp. 181–206). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, M. (1981). Union of states – The theory and practice of confederation. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaurdic, J. (2011). The hour of europe – Western powers and the breakup of Yugoslavia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, M. (2000). The Balkans. Nationalism, war and the great powers, 1804-1999. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2003). The federalist papers, Edited by C. Rossiter. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hasani, E. (2005). Self-determination under terms of the 2002 union agreement between Serbia and Montenegro: Tracing the origins of Kosovo’s self determination. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 80, 305–329.
   Google Scholar
• Hasic, J., & Karabegovic, D. (2019). Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Foreign Policy since independence. Cham: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, R. (1996). To end a war. New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Huskic, A. (2014). Complex system, complex foreign policy: The foreign policy of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In S. Keil & B. Stahl (Eds.), The Foreign policies of Post-Yugoslav states (pp. 122–143). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huskic, A. (2019). Bosnia and Herzegovina – Abandoned by the West, Embraced by the East? In F. Bieber & N. Tzifakis (Eds.), The Western Balkans in the World: Linkages and relations with Non-Western countries (pp. 83–108). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, I., & Smith, A. (Eds.). (1994). Nationalism. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Jenne, E., & Bieber, F. (2014). Situational nationalism: Nation-building in the Balkans, subversive institutions and the Montenegrin Paradox. Ethnopolitics, 13(5), 431–460. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2014.912447
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (2006). Toward perpetual peace. In D. Karmis & W. Norman (Eds.), Theories of Federalism. A Reader (pp. 87–100). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, R. (2004). The Solana process in Serbia and Montenegro: Coherence in EU foreign policy. International Peacekeeping, 11(3), 491–507. doi: 10.1080/1353331042000249064
   Google Scholar
• Keil, S. (2013). Multinational federalism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Abingdon: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, S., & Anderson, P. (2018). Decentralization as a tool of conflict resolution. In K. Detterbeck & E. Hepburn (Eds.), Handbook of territorial politics (pp. 89–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, J. (2000). Yugoslavia as history. In Twice There was a Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macek-Mackova, E. (2011). Challenges in conflict management in multi-ethnic states – The dissolution of Czechoslovakia and Serbia and Montenegro. Nationalities Papers, 39(4), 615–633. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2011.579952
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2009). Montenegro. A Modern History. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Obucina, V. (2012). Right-wing extremism in Croatia. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/09346.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perry, V. (2014). A ‘segment state’ vision of the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina? Transconflict. Retrieved from July 15, 2019, from http://www.transconflict.com/2014/02/segment-state-vision-future-bosnia-herzegovina-102/
   Google Scholar
• Pufendorf, S. (2006). Regular states vs. systems of states. In D. Karmis & W. Norman (Eds.), Theories of federalism. A reader (pp. 35–50). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ramet, S. (1992). Nationalism and federalism in Yugoslavia (1962- 1991) (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramet, S. (2006). The three Yugoslavias (State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarajlic, E. (2012). Conceptualising citizenship regime(s) in post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citizenship Studies, 16, 367–381. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2012.683247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber, L., & Little, A. (1996). The death of Yugoslavia. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stiks, I. (2015). Nations and citizens in Yugoslavia and the Post-Yugoslav States. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. (2020). Unions and the challenge of change. Irish Political Studies, 35(3), 335–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touquet, H. (2011). Multi-ethnic parties in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Naša Stranka and the paradoxes of postethnic politics. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 11(3), 451–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2011.01134.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Meurs, W. (2003). The Belgrade agreement: Robust mediation between Serbia and Montenegro. In F. Bieber (Ed.), Montenegro in transition – problems of identity and statehood (pp. 63–82). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Vladisavljević, N. (2016). Competitive authoritarianism and popular protest: Evidence from Serbia under Milošević. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 36–50. doi: 10.1177/0192512114535450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, I. (2015). Political dynamics of the post-communist Montenegro: One-party show. Democratization, 22(1), 73–91. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.814642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2018). Territorial self-government as a conflict management tool. Cham: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Zdeb, A. (2018). A federation like no other – The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 50 Shades of Federalism. Retrieved July 10, 2019, from http://50shadesoffederalism.com/case-studies/federation-like-no-case-bosnia-herzegovina/
   Google Scholar