Are Irish voters biased against female candidates? Evidence from the 2020 general election

References

• Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2007). Gender stereotyping of political candidates. Nordicom Review, 28(1), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. S. (1972). A theory of political ambition: Career choices and the role of structural incentives. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 144–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. H., & Erickson, L. (2003). Women candidates and voter bias: Do women politicians need to be better? Electoral Studies, 22(1), 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, F., & Galligan, Y. (2020). The 2020 general election: A gender analysis. Irish Political Studies, 35(4), 602–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, B. (1994). A Woman's place is in the house. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caul, M. (1999). Women's representation in parliament: The role of political parties. Party Politics, 5(1), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caul, M. (2001). Political parties and the adoption of candidate gender quotas: A cross–national analysis. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1214–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D., & Leyenaar, M. (2013). Breaking male dominance in old democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erzeel, S., & Caluwaerts, D. (2015). Is it gender, ideology or resources? Individual-level determinants of preferential voting for male or female candidates. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(3), 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzeel, S., de Leeuw, S., Marien, S., & Rihoux, B. (2018). Gender-based voting. In K. Deschouwer (Ed.), Mind the gap: Political participation and representation in Belgium (pp. 227–250). Colchester: ECPR.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M. (2011). Electoral systems: A comparative introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2006). Voter satisfaction and electoral systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference? European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 723–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, L. (2018). The abortion referendum of 2018 and a timeline of abortion politics in Ireland to date. Irish Political Studies, 33(4), 608–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2010). If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics, 72(2), 310–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Smith, E. R. (1998). The role of candidate sex in voter decision-making. Political Psychology, 19(2), 405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Marsh, M. (Eds.). (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Y. (1993). Party politics and gender in the Republic of Ireland. In J. Lovenduski & P. Norris (Eds.), Gender and party politics (pp. 147–167). London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, Y. (2008). STV: A gender-proportional system? In M. Tremblay (Ed.), Women and legislative representation (pp. 149–160). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Higgle, E. D., Miller, P. M., Shields, T. G., & Johnson, M. M. (1997). Gender stereotypes and decision context in the evaluation of political candidates. Women & Politics, 17(3), 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. (1992). Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of US Senate candidates. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 497–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. C., & Matland, R. E. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31(6), 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., Piston, S., & Bauer, N. M. (2015). Saving face: Identifying voter responses to black candidates and female candidates. Political Psychology, 37(2), 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 479–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women's underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. (1993). Introduction: The dynamics of gender and party. In J. Lovenduski & P. Norris (Eds.), Gender and Party Politics (pp. 1–15). London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (1993). Gender and party politics. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E., & Maccoby, N. (1954). The interview: A tool of social science. In L. Gardiner (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 449–487). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., & Tezcür, G. M. (2011). Women as candidates: An experimental study in Turkey. Politics & Gender, 7(3), 365–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, M., & Fine, T. S. (2006). Gender, ethnicity, and ballot information: Ballot cues in low-information elections. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 6(1), 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. L. (1997). Voting cues in low-information elections: Candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, G. (2018). The impact of gender quotas on voting behaviour in 2016. In M. Marsh, D. M. Farrell, & T. Reidy (Eds.), The post-crisis Irish voter (pp. 165–189). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, G., & Marsh, M. (2010). Candidate gender and voter choice: Analysis from a multimember preferential voting system. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 822–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, G., & Marsh, M. (2011). Electing women to the Dáil: Gender cues and the Irish voter. Irish Political Studies, 26(4), 521–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGing, C. (2013). The single transferable vote and women's representation in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 28(3), 322–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGing, C., & White, T. J. (2012). Gender and electoral representation in Ireland. Études irlandaises, 37–2, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1997). Choosing electoral systems: proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems. International Political Science Review, 18(3), 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2001). Cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2005). Women as political leaders worldwide: Cultural barriers and opportunities. In S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Women and elective office: Past, present, and future (pp. 244–263). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. (2015). The increasing effectiveness of national gender quotas, 1990–2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 331–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K., & McGhee, E. (2013). What it takes to win: Questioning “Gender Neutral” outcomes in US house elections. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 439–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenwasser, S. M., Rogers, R. R., Fling, S., Silvers-Pickens, K., & Butemeyer, J. (1987). Attitudes toward women and men in politics: Perceived male and female candidate competencies and participant personality characteristics. Political Psychology, 8(2), 191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenwasser, S. M., & Seale, J. (1988). Attitudes toward a hypothetical male or female presidential candidate: A research note. Political Psychology, 9(4), 591–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, W., & Zimmerman, J. F. (Eds.). (1994). Electoral systems in comparative perspective: Their impact on women and minorities. London: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2006). Do parties know that “Women Win”? Party leader beliefs about women's electoral chances. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 431–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapiro, V. (1981). If US senator baker were a woman: An experimental study of candidate images. Political Psychology, 3(1), 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., Malecki, M., & Crisp, B. F. (2010). Candidate gender and electoral success in single transferable vote systems. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 693–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & Fox, R. L. (2001). The electoral fortunes of women candidates for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, W. J., & Maisel, L. S. (2003). The not-so-simple calculus of winning: Potential US house candidates’ nomination and general election prospects. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 951–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, T. J. (2006). Why so few women in Dáil Eireann? The effects of the single transferable vote election system. New Hibernia Review, 10(4), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. (1994). Equity in representation for women and minorities. In W. Rule & J. F. Zimmerman (Eds.), Electoral systems in comparative perspective: Their impact on women and minorities (pp. 3–13). London: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar