5,491
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers and the implementation of a new English curriculum in Malaysia

&
Pages 260-277 | Received 06 May 2014, Accepted 21 Oct 2014, Published online: 20 Nov 2014

References

  • Alexander, R. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Alexander, R. (2008). Education for all, the quality imperative and the problem of pedagogy. London: Institute of Education.
  • Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83–90.
  • Brain, K., Reid, I., & Boyes, L. C. (2006). Teachers as mediators between educational policy and practice. Educational Studies, 32(4), 411–423.
  • Carless, D. R. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4), 485–500.
  • Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, National Staff Development Council.
  • Ellis, R. (2008). Principles of instructed second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Hao, W., & Liu, Y. (2012). The discourse of English reading lessons in Chinese middle schools: A sociocultural perspective. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 212–228.
  • Hardman, F. (2008). The guided co-construction of knowledge. In M. Martin-Jones, A. de Mejia, & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of language and education (pp. 253–264). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Hardman, F., & Abd-Kadir, J. (2010). Classroom discourse: Towards a dialogic pedagogy. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (pp. 254–264). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  • Hardman, F., Ackers, J., O'Sullivan, M., & Abrishamian, N. (2011). Developing a systematic approach to teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging lessons from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Compare, 41(5), 669–683.
  • Hardman, F., Stoff, C., Aung, W., & Elliot, L. (2014). Developing pedagogical practices in Myanmar primary schools: Possibilities and constraints. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/02188791.2014.906387
  • He, Y., Prater, K., & Steed, T. (2011). Moving beyond ‘just good teaching’: ESL professional development for all teachers. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 7–18.
  • Heng, C. S., & Tan, H. (2006). English for mathematics and science: Current Malaysian language-in-education policies and practices. Language and Education, 20(4), 306–321.
  • Ho, W. K. (2002). English language teaching in East Asia today: An overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 1–22.
  • Hornberger, N., & Chick, K. (2001). Co-constructing school safetime: Safetalk practices in Peruvian and South African classrooms. In M. Heller & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Voices of authority: Education and linguistic difference (pp. 31–55). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.
  • Hu, Q. Q. (2004). A survey on the questioning pattern of college English teachers. Foreign Language World, 6, 22–27.
  • Hussin, H. (2006). Dimensions of questioning: A qualitative study of current classroom practice in Malaysia. TESL-EJ, Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 10(2), 1–18.
  • Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5–20.
  • Kabilan, M. K., & Veratharaju, K. (2013). Professional development needs of primary school English-language teachers in Malaysia. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 330–351.
  • Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of CPD: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235–250.
  • Kırkögz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovations in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–1875.
  • Martin, P. (2005). Safe language practices in two rural schools in Malaysia: Tensions between policy and practice. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 74–97). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1–14.
  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Malaysian English language curriculum for primary schools. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education.
  • Molinari, L., Mameli, C., & Gnisci, A. (2013). A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools. The many faces of the IRF pattern. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 414–430.
  • Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613.
  • Obaidul Hamid, M., & Honan, E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom: Implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 25(2), 139–156.
  • O'Donnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3), 300–315.
  • OECD. (2011). Building a high quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world. Paris: Author.
  • Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243–253.
  • O'Sullivan, M. C. (2010). Educating the teacher educator: A Ugandan case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 377–387.
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
  • Quinn, M. (2013). Talking to learn in Timorese classrooms. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(2), 179–196.
  • Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rui, T., & Chew, P. G.-L. (2013). Pedagogical use of two languages in a Chinese elementary school. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(3), 317–331.
  • Shihiba, S. E. S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers’ conceptions of the communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.
  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge.
  • Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292–306.
  • Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Suzuki, S., & Howe, E. R. (2010). Asian perspectives on teacher education. London: Routledge.
  • Timperley, H. (2011). Realising the power of professional learning. London: Open University Press.
  • Tsui, A. B. (1985). Analyzing input and interaction in second language classrooms. RELC Journal, 16(1), 8–30.
  • Vaish, V. (2008). Interactional patterns in Singapore's English classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 19, 366–377.
  • Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2008). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of teaching. The Chinese English Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 5–30.
  • Yang, L. F., & Ishak, S. A. (2012). Framing controversy over language policy in Malaysia: The coverage of PPSMI reversal (teaching of mathematics and science in English) by Malaysian newspapers. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(5), 449–473.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.