Honouring ESL students' lived experiences in school learning with multiliteracies pedagogy

References

• Ajayi, L. (2011). A multiliteracies pedagogy: Exploring semiotic possibilities of a Disney video in a third grade diverse classroom. Urban Reviews: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 43(3), 396–413. doi: 10.1007/s11256-010-0151-0
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189–208. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E., Hutchins, R. J., & McDevitt, R. (2012). Adolescents’ engagement with Web 2.0 and social media: Research, theory, and practice. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2011). Global crises, social justice, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 222–234. doi:10.1177/0022487110385428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, E. (2001). Considering the multiliteracies pedagogy: Looking through the lens of family literacy. In M. Kalantzis & B. Cope (Eds.), Transformation in language and learning: Perspectives on multiliteracies (pp. 99–112). Altona, VIC: Common Ground.
   Google Scholar
• Barrell, B. R. C. (2001). Technology, teaching and learning: Issues in the integration of technology. Calgary, AB: Detselig Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Fetherston, T. (2003). The effects of incorporating a word processor into a year three writing program. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003, 139–161.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. W. (2007). Fanfiction writing and the construction of space. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(4), 384–397.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, H., Chapman, L., & Vezzu, S. (2010). The black-white achievement gap revisited. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(21), 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A. (2009). Checkmarks on the screen: Questions of assessment and new literacies in the digital age. In A. Burke & R. F. Hammet (Eds.), Assessing new literacies: Perspectives from the classroom (pp. 35–54). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A., Hughes, J., Hardware, S., & Thomas, S. (2013). Adolescents as agents of change: Digital text-making for social justice. Education Matters, 1(2), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). Tech-saviness meets multiliteracies: Exploring girls’ technology-mediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 356–385. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.38.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. (2009). Teaching for joy and justice. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London/New York: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). Multiliteracies: New Literacies, new learning. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 105–135). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing times. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Danzak, R. L. (2011). Defining identities through multiliteracies: ELL teens narrate their immigration experiences as graphic stories. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55(1), 187–196. doi:10.1002/JAAL00024
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Newfoundland and Labrador. (1998). English language arts guide: Grade 4–6. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/english/grade4_6/ELA_Elementary_Curriculum_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Newfoundland and Labrador. (2010a). English language arts: Curriculum guide grades 7–9. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/english/index.html#grade7_9_interim
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Newfoundland and Labrador. (2010b). Meeting the needs of students from diverse cultures: A handbook for administrators. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/esl/meeting-the-needs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Newfoundland and Labrador. (2011a). English Language Arts: Grade 8. Interim Edition. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/english/grade8/Complete_2011_G8_ELA_curriculum_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Newfoundland and Labrador. (2011b). ESL foundations: A foundation English course for grades 7–12 students with limited literacy skills. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov.nl.ca/edu/k12/curriculum/guides/esl/esl_foundation_curriculum_guide_intermediate_senior_high.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enciso, P. (2011). Storytelling in critical literacy pedagogy: Removing the walls between immigrant and non-immigrant youth. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exley, B. (2008). Communities of learners: Early years students, new learning pedagogy, and transformations. In A. Healy (Ed.), Multiliteracies and diversity in education: New pedagogies for expanding landscapes (pp. 126–143). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giampapa, F. (2010). Multiliteracies, pedagogy and identities: Teacher and student voices from a Toronto elementary school. Canadian Journal of Education, 33(2), 407–431.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Towards a critical pedagogy of learning. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, B., & Gamboa, M. (2005). Online journaling: The informal writings of two adolescent girls. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(2), 168–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammett, R. F. (2007). Assessment and new literacies. E-Learning, 4(3), 343–354. doi:10.2304/elea.2007.4.3.343
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. (2008). Expanding students’ capabilities: Learning by design pedagogy. In A. Healy (Ed.), Multiliteracies and diversity in education: New pedagogies for expanding landscapes (pp. 2–29). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: Pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kajee, L. (2011). Multimodal representations of identity in the English-as-an-additional-language classroom in South Africa. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 24(3), 241–252. doi:10.1080/07908318.2011.610896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Introduction: Initial development of the ‘multiliteracies’ concept. In S. Mary & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Volume 1: Language policy and political issues in education (2nd ed., pp. 195–211). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Fehring, H. (2002). PEN: Multiliteracies: Teaching and learning in the new communications environment. Retrieved November 23, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICEx.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(1), 15–26. doi:10.1080/09695940301692
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, L. (2011). High-stakes standardized testing and marginalized youth: An examination of the impact on those who fail. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 112–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, J. Y., Phillips, R., Townsend, M., & Henderson-Wilson, C. (2010). Using a qualitative approach to research to build trust between a non-aboriginal researcher and aboriginal participants (Australia). Qualitative Research Journal, 10(1), 2–12. doi: 10.3316/QRJ1001002
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, D. E., & Jackson, A. (2009). We real cool: Toward a theory of black masculine literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 278–297. doi10.1598/RRQ.43.3.3 doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2002). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12468587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Third spaces are interesting places: Applying ‘third space theory’ to nursery-aged children's constructions of themselves as readers. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8(1), 43–66. doi:10.1177/1468798407087161
   Google Scholar
• Lotherington, H. (2013). Creating third spaces in the linguistically heterogeneous classroom for the advancement of pluriligualism. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 619–625. doi:10.1002/tesq.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClay, J. K., & Mackey, M. (2009). Distributed assessment in our space: This is not a rubric. In A. Burke & R. F. Hammett (Eds.), Assessing new literacies: Perspectives from the new classroom (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A. (2009). Multiliteracies: Interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, 23(2), 103–116. doi:10.1080/09500780802152762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Moody, A. K., Justice, L. M., & Cabell, S. Q. (2010). Electronic versus traditional storybooks: Relative influence on preschool children's engagement and communication. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 294–313. doi:10.1177/1468798410372162
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntelioglou, Y. B. (2011). But why do I have to take this class? The mandatory drama-ESL class and multiliteracies pedagogy. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 16(4), 595–615. doi: 10.1080/13569783.2011.617108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owodally, A. (2011). Multilingual language and literacy practices and social identities in Sunni Madrasahs in Mauritius: A case study. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 134–155. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.46.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B. (1995). Mick Harte was here. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. (2008). Spatial literacy: Reading (and writing) game space. Retrieved August 11, 2012, from http://lcc.gatech.edu/~cpearce3/PearcePubs/Pearce_FROG_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2010). Aboriginal students engaging and struggling with critical multiliteracies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(4), 257–266. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirbhai-Illich, F., Nat Turner, K. C., & Austin, T. Y. (2009). Using digital technologies to address Aboriginal adolescents’ education: An alternative school intervention. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(2), 144–162. doi: 10.1108/17504970910967573
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, L., Canning, N., Faulbaber, D., Lingle, W., & Redgrave, A. (2014). A multiliteracies approach to materials analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(2), 136–150. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.927883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2008). Fostering mulitiliteracies pedagogy through pre-service teacher education. Teaching Education, 19(2), 109–122. doi:10.1080/10476210802040799
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011). Rethinking literacies education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies and new literacies. Brock Educational Journal, 21(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, J., Nolan, A., & Raban, B. (2013). Young learners: Interpreting literacy practice in the preschool years. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36(1), 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(5), 342–350. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.5.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, P., & Newfield, D. (2004). Shifting the gaze in South African classrooms: New pedagogies, new publics, new democracies. Thinking Classroom, 5(1), 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. K., Bernhard, J. K., Garg, S., & Cummins, J. (2008). Affirming plural belonging: Building on students’ family-based cultural capital through multiliteracies pedagogy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8(3), 269–294. doi: 10.1177/1468798408096481
   Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, G., & Louw, A. (2008). Technology assisted learning for improving the reading skills for young South African learners. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(3), 245–254.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, M. (2007). The effects of technological multimodality and new literacies on learning and writing in the primary classroom (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). Durham University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S. (2010). Towards an accessible pedagogy: Dis/ability, multimodality, and universal design in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 427–454. doi: 10.1080/10572252.2010.502090
   Google Scholar
• Yelland, N., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Learning by design: Creating a pedagogical framework for knowledge building in the twenty-first century. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 197–213. doi: 10.1080/13598660802232597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammit, P. K. (2011). Connecting multiliteracies and engagement of students from low socio-economic backgrounds: Using Bernstein's pedagogic discourse as a bridge. Language and Education, 25(3), 203–220. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2011.560945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar