590
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘I can easily switch to the Kazakh language, also to the Russian language’: reimagining Kazakhstani CLIL implementation as a third space

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 121-138 | Received 12 Oct 2022, Accepted 03 Aug 2023, Published online: 18 Aug 2023

References

  • .). Adilet.zan.kz. .
  • Action Plan for Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity. (2003). Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0449:FIN.
  • An, J., Macaro, E., & Childs, A. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference? System, 98, 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102482
  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Apple, M. W. (2011). Global crises, social justice, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110385428
  • Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
  • Banegas, D. L. (2020). Content knowledge in English language teacher education. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350084650
  • Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. Blackwell.
  • Block, D., & Moncada-Comas, B. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education and the ELT gaze: STEM lecturers’ self-positioning as NOT English language teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1689917
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity.
  • Breeze, R., & Legarre, M. P. A. (2021). Understanding change in practice: Identity and emotions in teacher training for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Language Studies, 15(3), 25–44.
  • Calafato, R. (2019). The non-native speaker teacher as proficient multilingual: A critical review of research from 2009–2018. Lingua, 227, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.001
  • Cammarata, L., & Haley, C. (2018). Integrated content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: A professional development journey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1386617
  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Interrogating the “native speaker fallacy”: Non-linguistic roots, non-pedagogical results. In G. Baine (Ed), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 77–92). Routledge.
  • Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Eisenhart, M. (2014). Cultural perspectives in science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 2069–2135). Routledge.
  • Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
  • Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: Threat or opportunity? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1284855
  • Cousin, G. (2005). Case study research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500290967
  • Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, (pp. 1200–1214). Springer.
  • Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins.
  • Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Darvin, R., Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. (2020). Examining CLIL through a critical lens. English Teaching & Learning, 44(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00062-2
  • Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction – A growing global phenomenon. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4f72cdf8-b2eb-4d41-a785-4a283bf6caaa.
  • de Souza, L. M. (2014). Epistemic diversity, lazy reason, and ethical translation in postcolonial contexts: The case of indigenous educational policy in Brazil. Interfaces Brasil/Canadá. Canoas, 14(2), 36–60.
  • Fataar, A. (2016). Towards a humanising pedagogy through an engagement with the social-subjective in educational theorising in South Africa. Educational Research for Social Change, 5(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2016/v5i1a1
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. (C. Gordon, ed.) Pantheon.
  • Fox, N. J. (2003). Practice-based evidence: Towards collaborative and transgressive research. Sociology, 37(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001388
  • Francomacaro, M. R. (2019). The added value of teaching CLIL for ESP and subject teachers. International Journal of Language Studies, 13(4), 55–72.
  • Fung, D., & Yip, V. (2014). The effects of the medium of instruction in certificate-level physics on achievement and motivation to learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1219–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21174
  • García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism, and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 128–145). Orient Blackswan.
  • Gierlinger, E. (2015). ‘You can speak German, sir’: On the complexity of teachers’ L1 use in CLIL. Language and Education, 29(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1023733
  • Gupta, A. (2006). Early experiences and personal funds of knowledge and beliefs of immigrant and minority teacher candidates dialog with theories of child development in a teacher education classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 27(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020500534224
  • Gupta, A. (2020). Preparing teachers in a pedagogy of Third Space: A postcolonial approach to contextual and sustainable early childhood teacher education. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1692108
  • Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
  • Hedges, H. (2012). Teachers’ funds of knowledge: A challenge to evidence-based practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.622548
  • Heugh, K., Prinsloo, C., Makgamatha, M., Diedericks, G., & Winnaar, L. (2017). Multilingualism (s) and system-wide assessment: A southern perspective. Language and Education, 31(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261894
  • Iranmehr, A., & Davari, H. (2017). English language education in Iran: A site of struggle between globalized and localized versions of English. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 1(2), 70–84.
  • Jansen, D. (2022). Qualitative data coding: Explained simply. https://gradcoach.com/qualitative-data-coding-101.
  • Kanayeva, G. (2019). Developing teacher leadership in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 10(1), 53–64.
  • Karabassova, L. (2020). understanding trilingual education reform in Kazakhstan: Why is it stalled? In D. Egéa (Ed), Education, Equity, Economy,: Education in Central Asia A Kaleidoscope of Challenges and Opportunities, (pp. 37–51). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50127-3_3
  • Karabassova, L. (2022). Is top-down CLIL justified? A grounded theory exploration of secondary school science teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1530–1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1775781
  • Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D. (2018). CLIL teacher professional development for content teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 93–108.
  • Li, M. (2018). The effectiveness of a bilingual education program at a Chinese university: A case study of social science majors. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(8), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231164
  • Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926
  • Lin, A. M. Y., & He, T. (2017). Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classrooms. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 16(4), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1328283
  • Liu, Y. (2020). Translanguaging and trans-semiotizing as planned systematic scaffolding: examining feeling-meaning in CLIL classrooms. English Teaching Learning, 44(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00057-z
  • Llinares, A., & Morton, T. (2017). Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Lo, Y. Y. (2019). Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(7), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821
  • Lo, Y. Y. (2020). Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer.
  • Lopriore, L. (2020). Reframing teaching knowledge in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A European perspective.
  • Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied linguistics, 31(3), 418–442.
  • Maxwell-Reid, C., & Lau, K. (2016). Genre and technicality in analogical explanations: Hong Kong’s English language textbooks for junior secondary science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.005
  • McDougald, J. S., & Pissarello, D. (2020). Content and language integrated learning: In-service teachers’ knowledge and perceptions before and after a professional development program Íkala. Revista De Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ika-la.v25n02a03
  • McKinley, E., & Gan, M. J. S. (2014). Culturally responsive science education for indigenous and ethnic minority students. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 298–314). Routledge.
  • Mehisto, P., Winter, L., Kambatyrova, A., & Kurakbayev, K. (2022). CLIL as a conduit for a trilingual Kazakhstan. The Language Learning Journal, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2056627
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • MOES. (2015). The roadmap of trilingual education for 2015–2020. http://www.kafu.kz/en/academic-programs/3langeduen/roadmap-of-trilingual.
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of every day funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
  • Moodie, I. (2016). The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, 60, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.011
  • Moore, E., Evnitskaya, N., & Ramos-de Robles, S. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in linguistically diverse classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 341–352.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9783-z
  • Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
  • Nikula, T., & Moore, P. (2019). Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151
  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  • Pavón, V., & Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teacher roles and competencies in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Linguarum Arena, 4, 65–78. https://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/12007.pdf.
  • Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2016). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13
  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  • Poza, L. (2017). Translanguaging: Definitions, implications, and further needs in burgeoning inquiry. Berkeley Review of Education, 6(2), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.5070/b86110060
  • Pun, J. K. H., & Tai, K. W. H. (2021). Doing science through translanguaging: A study of translanguaging practices in secondary English as a medium of instruction science laboratory sessions. International Journal of Science Education, 43(7), 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1902015
  • Recchia, S. L., & McDevitt, S. E. (2018). Unraveling universalist perspectives on teaching and caring for infants and toddlers: Finding authenticity in diverse funds of knowledge. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1387206
  • Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Cenoz, J. (2015). Way forward in the twenty-first century in content-based instruction: Moving towards integration. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000927
  • Samuel, M. (2009). Beyond the Garden of Eden: Deep teacher professional development. South African Journal of Higher Education, 23(4), 739–761.
  • Santos, D. B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Journal of Living Theories, 9(2), 87–98.
  • Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 26(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1230555
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
  • Smagulova, J. (2008). Language policies of Kazakhization and their influence on language attitudes and use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 11(3-4), 440–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802148798
  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
  • Soleimani, N. (2020). ELT teachers’ epistemological beliefs and dominant teaching style: A mixed method research. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00094-y
  • Tai, K. W. H., & Wei, L. (2020). Bringing the outside in: Connecting students’ out-of-school knowledge and experience through translanguaging in Hong Kong English Medium Instruction mathematics classes. System, 95, 102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102364
  • Tanaka, K. (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Compatibility of a European model of education to Japanese higher education. International & Regional Studies, 54, 61–81. https://meigaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2895.
  • Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Language teacher agency. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916943
  • Tsuchiya, K. (2019). CLIL and language education in Japan. In Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts, policy, practice, and pedagogy (pp. 37–56). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27443-6_3
  • Van Viegen, S., & Zappa-Hollman, S. (2020). Plurilingual pedagogies at the post-secondary level: Possibilities for intentional engagement with students’ diverse linguistic repertoires. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1686512
  • Yazan, B. (2018). Identity and non-native English speaker teachers. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. TESOL Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0020
  • Yildiz, M. (2019). Preservice and in-service CLIL teachers’ perceived competencies and satisfaction with the training programmes: An investigation in Spanish context [Unpublished master’s thesis, Sakarya University].
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
  • Zhou, X. (2021). Engaging in pedagogical translanguaging in a Shanghai EFL high school class. ELT Journal, 77(1), 1–10.