The intersubjective: A core concept for psychoanalysisFootnote^†

^†This is a fully revised version of the paper previously read at the XIth IARPP Conference in Santiago de Chile, November 8, 2013, as a discussion of the plenary “Drives and Fields: Are Drive Theory and Intersubjectivity Really Incompatible?”

References

• Ávila, A. (2005). Al cambio psíquico se accede por la relación [Relationship: The path to psychic change]. Intersubjetivo. Revista de Psicoterapia Psicoanalítica y Salud, 7(2), 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila, A. (2009). Artesano de necesidades y tiempos, el psicoterapeuta realiza sus obras con restos de naufragios [The psychotherapist, artisan of needs and time, creates his works by salvaging remains from wrecks]. Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 3(3), 582–592.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila Espada, A. (2013a). Hacernos personas recorriendo el camino del cambio [Becoming persons in the journey of change]. Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 7(1), 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila Espada, A. (2013b). La relación, contexto determinante de la transformación. Reflexiones en torno al papel de la interpretación, el insight y la experiencia emocional en el cambio psíquico [Relationship, a decisive context for transformation]. Temas de Psicoanálisis, (6). Retrieved from http://www.temasdepsicoanalisis.org/la-relacion-contexto-determinante-de-la-transformacion1/
   Google Scholar
• Ávila Espada, A. (ed.). (2013c). La tradición interpersonal. Perspectiva social y cultural del Psicoanálisis. [Interpersonal tradition. Social and cultural perspective in psychoanalysis]. Madrid: Ágora Relacional.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. (2012). The intrapsychic and the intersubjective in contemporary psychoanalysis, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 21 (3–4), 130–135.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., & Baranger, W. (1969). Problemas del campo psicoanalítico [Problems of psychoanalytic field]. Buenos Aires: Kargieman.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference (pp. 27–48). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W.R. (1957). Second thoughts: Selected papers on psychoanalysis. Nueva York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coderch, J. (2012). Realidad, Interacción y cambio psíquico. La práctica de la psicoterapia relacional-II [Reality, interaction and psychic change. The practice of relational psychotherapy-II]. Madrid: Ágora Relacional.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W.R.D. (1952). Psychoanalytical studies of the personality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1928). The elasticity of psychoanalytic technique. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis (pp. 87–101). London: Maresfield.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1988). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi (J. Dupont, ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, S.H. (2000). The musical edge of therapeutic dialogue. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, S.H. (2014). El inconsciente teórico: Pulsión, Campo y más allá [The theoretical unconscious: Drive, field and beyond]. Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 8(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T.H. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, D., Atwood, G., & Stolorow, R.D. (1997). Working intersubjectively. Contextualism in the psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon Rivière, E. (1985). Teoría del Vínculo [Bond theory]. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D.B. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D.B. (2010). Partners in thought. Working with unformulated experience, dissociation and enactment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D.N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow R.D., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry (Swick, H., and Ladd, M., Comp.). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: an infant communicating. In U. Neissser (ed.), The perceived self: Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge (pp. 121–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S. & Brazelton, T.B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Communication, 27, 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D.W. (1969). The use of an object. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 711–716.
   Google Scholar