Psychoanalytic treatments and empirical research on their efficacy: A commentary

References

• Andrade, V.M. (2003). Affect, thought, and consciousness: The Freudian theory of psychic structuring from an evolutionary perspective. Neuro-Psychoanal, 5, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Arlow, J., & Brenner, C. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59, 678–692. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1990.11927293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, H.M. (1993). The Columbia Records Project and the evolution of psychoanalytic outcome research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 41, 279–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, H.M., Galatzer–Levy, R., Skolnikoff, A., & Waldron, S. (1991). On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 871–916. doi: 10.1177/000306519103900402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudry, F. (1991). The relevance of the analyst's character and attitudes to his work. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 917–938. doi: 10.1177/000306519103900403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benecke, C. (2014). Die Bedeutung empirischer Forschung für die Psychoanalyse [The significance of empirical research for psychoanalysis]. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 30, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, B. (1972). Notes on transference: Universal phenomenon and hardest part of analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 20, 267–301. doi: 10.1177/000306517202000203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandl, Y., Bruns, G., Gerlach, A., Hau, S., Janssen, P., Kächele, H., et al. (2004). Psychoanalytische Therapie [Psychoanalytic therapy]. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 20, 13–125.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (2002). Reflections on psychoanalysis. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 11, 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M.B. (1996). Metaphern der "Kur." Eine qualitative Studie zum psychotherapeutischen Prozess [Metaphors of the "cure." A qualitative study of the psychotherapeutic process]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M.B. (2000). Diagnose oder: Verständigung in Beziehungen [Diagnosis or: Understanding in relationships]. Psychotherapie & Sozialwissenschaft, 2, 172–202.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.L. (1963). Experimental and quasi–experimental designs for research and teaching. In N.L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research and teaching (pp. 12–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chused, J.F. (1996). The patient's perception of the analyst's countertransference. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4, 231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Dahmer, H. (1973). Libido und Gesellschaft. [Libido and society]. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher A.U. (2000). Foundations for conceptual research in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, A. (2002). What are the aims of psychoanalysts? In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber and M. Target (eds.), Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers (pp. 17–29). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Erle, J., & Goldberg, D. (1984). Problems in the assessment of analyzability. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 48, 48–84. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1979.11926868
   Google Scholar
• Fine, S., & Fine, E. (1991). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, R.A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J.L. (1997). Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Is there a meaningful distinction in the process? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 14, 409–425. doi: 10.1037/h0079733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (1998). The psychoanalytic process: The search for common ground. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 297–304. doi: 10.1037/0736-9735.15.2.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2000). The status of psychoanalytic theory today: There is an elephant there. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 174–179. doi: 10.1037/0736-9735.17.1.174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, N., Hoffenberg, J.D., Varus, N., & Frosch, A. (1999). The effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: The role of treatment duration, frequency of sessions, and the therapeutic relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 741–772. doi: 10.1177/00030651990470031001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working–through. SE 12: 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, D.O., & Westen, D. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 823–841. doi: 10.1516/N4T0-4D5G-NNPL-H7NL
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1994). Farewell to the objective analyst. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (2002). American pragmatism and American psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 71, 235–250. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00012.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S.H. (2002). Evidence–based psychotherapeutics. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 30, 3–16. doi: 10.1521/jaap.30.1.3.21986
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, A. (1996). What kind of research for psychoanalysis? Newsletter of the International Psychoanalytic Association, 5, 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and human interests (J.J. Shapiro, Trans.) London: Heinemann, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. (1996). The analyst’s preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, K., Moras, K., Brill, P., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). The evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E.E., & Windholz, M. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: Toward a method for systematic inquiry. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 985–1015. doi: 10.1177/000306519003800405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kächele, H. (1986). Maschinelle Inhaltsanalyse in der psychoanalytischen Prozess­forschung [Mechanical content analysis in psychoanalytic process research]. Ulm: PSZ-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J.L. (1986). The role of the patient-analyst “match” in the outcome of psychoanalysis. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 14, 273–297.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J.L., Katz, A.L., & Paolitto, F. (1990a). Follow–up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination. II. Development of the self–analytic function. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 637–654. doi: 10.1177/000306519003800305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J.L., Katz, A.L., & Paolitto, F. (1990b). Follow–up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination. III. The relation between the resolution of the transference and the patient–analyst match. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 655–678. doi: 10.1177/000306519003800306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. (2002). Present challenges to psychoanalysis. In: M. Leuzinger-Bohleber and M. Target (eds.), Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers (pp. 323–331). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and E. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger–Bohleber, M., Stuhr, U., Rüger, B., & Beutel, M. (2003). How to study the ‘quality of psychoanalytic treatments’ and their long–term effects on patients’ well–being: A representative, multi–perspective follow–up study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 263–290. doi: 10.1516/C387-0AFM-4P34-M4BT
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzer, A. (1970). Sprachzerstörung und Rekonstruktion [Destruction of language and its reconstruction]. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, P., Blatt, S., & Corveleyn, J. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 571–610. doi: 10.1177/00030651060540021401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, R. (1994). Validation in the clinical process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 1133–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1862). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. A connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Routledge, 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1953). Thinking. Acta Psychologica, 9, 189–196. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(53)90012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carlsson, J., Broberg, J., & Schuber, J. (2000). Varieties of long–term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long–term psychotherapy: A review of findings in the Stockholm outcome of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy project. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 921–942. doi: 10.1516/0020757001600291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomä, H., & Kächele, H, (1973). Wissenschaftstheoretische und methodologische Probleme der klinisch-psychoanalytischen Forschung. Psyche, 27, 205–236.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S.C., & Roose, S. (1995). The analytic process: clinical and research definitions. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 343–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S.C., & Roose, S.P. (2000). Patient-therapist match: Revelation or resistance? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48, 885–899. doi: 10.1177/00030651000480031901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, S.C., Spitzer, R., Davies, M., & Roose, S. (1997). The definition and assessment of analytic process: Can analysts agree? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 78, 959–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R.S. (1986). Forty-two lives in treatment: A study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R.S. (1998). The new American psychoanalysis: A commentary. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, 1021–1043. doi: 10.1177/00030651980460041501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B.E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Models, methods, and findings. London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wurmser, L. (1989). Either-Or: Some comments on Professor Grünbaum's critique of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 9, 220–248.
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S. (2008). Naturalistic studies of psychoanalytic treatments – Some epistemological and methodological remarks. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 31, 50–60. doi: 10.1080/01062301.2008.10592828
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S. (2009). Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychotherapy research – some epistemological remarks. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 37, 645–664. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2009.37.4.645
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S. (2012). Repression and substitutive formation—The relationship of Freud’s concepts reconsidered. Psychoanaytic Review, 99, 397–420. doi: 10.1521/prev.2012.99.3.397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zepf, S., & Hartmann, S. (2002). Wissenschaftliche Prüfung und wissenschaftliche Anerkennung psychotherapeutischer Verfahren [Scientific testing and scientific approval of psychotherapeutic measures]. Psychotherapeut, 47, 278–284.
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S., & Hartmann, S. (2004). Freud’s concept of transference and transference neurosis: Re-assessed. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 27, 20–33. doi: 10.1080/01062301.2004.10592934
   Google Scholar