Hegemonic Feminism Revisited: On the Promises of Intersectionality in Times of the Precarisation of Life

References

• Alarcón, N. (1991). The theoretical subject(s) of this bridge called my back and Anglo-American feminism. In H. Calderón & J. D. Saldívar (Eds.), Criticism in the borderlands: Studies in Chicano literature, culture and ideology (pp. 182–198). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amos, V., & Parmar, P. (1984). Challenging imperial feminism. Many voices, one chant: Black feminist perspectives. Feminist Review, 17, 3‒19.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, A., Hvenegård-Lassen, K., & Knobblock, I. (2015). Feminism in postcolonial nordic spaces. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 23(4), 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing feminism: Gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to – Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone. Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 405‒424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of hope (Vol. 3, N. Knight, trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism without racists. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women Studies, 5(3), 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2015). Precariousness and grievability. When is life grievable? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Carbin, M., & Edenheim, S. (2013). The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language. European Journal of Women´s Studies, 20(3), 233‒248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carby, H. (1982). White woman listen! Black feminism and the boundaries of sisterhood. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.), The empire strikes back: Race and racism in 70s Britain (pp. 212–235). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, B. (1988, Spring). The race for theory. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 66‒79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. (1991). In the way of women, men´s resistance to gender equality in organisations (1st ed.). London: ILR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. P. (2017b). On intellectual activism. New York: Temple university press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins Hill, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Maiden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs, 14(4), 745–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2017a). On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(9), 1460–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapanzano, V. (2008). Reflections of hope as a category of social and psychological analysis. Cultural Anthropology, 18(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, U. (2017). Between familiar differences and American tunes: The geopolitical grammar of nordic gender studies in an age of europeanisation. In U. M. L. Dahl & U. Manns (Eds.), The geopolitics of nordic and Russian gender research 1975–2005 (pp. 67–126). Huddinge: Södertörns University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1981). Women, race and class. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, P. (2016). When feminism became gender equality and anti-racism turned into diversity management. In L. Martinsson, G. Griffin, & K. G. Nygren (Eds.), Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden (pp. 23–47). London: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, P. (2017). Working life inequalities: Do we need intersectionality. Society Health and Vulnerability, 8, 14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, P., Molina, I., & Mulinari, D. (2002). The different fashions of power. Gender, class and ethnicity in postcolonial Sweden [Maktens olika förklädnader. Kön, klass och etnicitet i det postkoloniala Sverige]. Stockholm: Atlas.
   Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, P., & Mulinari, D. (2005). Intersectionality. Critical reflections on a landscape of inequality [Intersektionalitet; kritiska reflektioner över (o) jämlikhetens landskap]. Lund: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. (Ed). (2007). Another knowledge is possible. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2006). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinerstein, A. (2015). The politics of autonomy in Latin America: The art of organizing hope. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L., & Munoz, E. (2009). Hope and hopelessness. A dialogue. Women and performance. A Journal of Feminist Theory, 19(2), 285‒297.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. (2013). Anti-cartesian decoloniality and pluriversal transmodernity. Human architecture. Journal of the Sociology of Self Knowledge, 11(1), 13‒35.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (2015). Hope. Without optimism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. (2004). Postcolonial melancholia. New York, NY: Columbia University press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R. (ed). (2018). Theories of hope. Exploring alternative affective dimensions of human experience. London: Lexington books.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. (2003). Colonial subjects. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. E., Boatca, M., & Costa, S. (Eds.). (2010). Decolonizing European sociology: Transdisciplinary approaches. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1989). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. Framework: the Journal of Cinema and Media, 36, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, G.-A. (2005). Race, class, gender: Reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women's Studies, 12(3), 249‒265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2007). The imaginary reconstruction of society. Utopian as method. Utopia, method, vision. Moylan and Baccolinin. London: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. (2013). Unsafe travel: Experiencing intersectionality and feminist displacements. Signs, 38(4), 869–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liinason, M. (2011) Feminist in the academy. Exploring the politics of institutionalisation in gender studies in Sweden ( Doctoral thesis). Lund: Lunds University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liinason, M., & Cuesta, M. (2016). Politics of hope. Feminism activism in Sweden today [Hoppets politik: feministisk aktivism i Sverige idag]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Makadam förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, H., Herrera Vivar, M. T., & Supik, L. (2011). Framing intersectionality: Debates on a multi-faceted concept in gender studies. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2003). Intersectionality. A useful concept for Gender Studies? Intersektionalitet - ett användbart begrepp för genusforskningen? Kvinnovetenskaplig Tidskrift., 1, 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsson, L., & Mulinari, D. (ed). (2018). Dreaming global change, doing local feminisms. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1999). Negotiating disciplinary boundaries. Current Sociology, 47(4), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1986). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: Kitchen Table Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. (1975/2019). 12 of Toni Morrison’s most memorable quotes. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/books/toni-morrison-quotes.html
   Google Scholar
• Mulinari, D. (2016). Gender equality under treat? Exploring the paradoxes of an ethno nationalist party. In L. Martinsson, G. Griffin, & K. G. Nygren (Eds.), Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden (pp. 137–162). London: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulinari, D., & Lundqvist, Å. (2017). Invisible, burdensome and threatening. The location of migrant women in the Swedish welfare state. In A. Ålund, C.-U. Schierup, & A. Neergaard (Eds.), Reimagining the nation. Essays on twenty first century Sweden (pp. 119–141). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing Groups. (Political and Social Change).
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (2011). Practicing love: Black feminism, love-politics, and post-intersectionality. Meridians Feminism Race Transnationalism, 11(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (2015). Feminist originalism: Intersectionality and the politics of reading. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 3‒20.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (2018). Black feminist reimagined. After intersectionality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeiro, C. (2018). The green wave. Desire and feminist transversality [Deseo y transversalidad feminista]. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@j_
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A., & Pattynama, P. (2006). Special issue on intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 87‒92.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2010). The notion of ‘rights’ and the paradoxes of postcolonial modernity: Indigenous peoples and women in Bolivia. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schild, V. (2019). Feminisms, the environment and capitalism: On the necessary ecological dimension of a critical Latin American feminism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 20(6), 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick Kosofsky, E. (2002). Paranoid and reparative reading: Or you are so paranoid, you think this essay is about you. In E. Sedgwick, M. Barale, J. Goldberg, & M. Moon (Eds.), Touching, affect, pedagogy, performativity (Series Q) (pp. 124–150). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, J., & G. Ch. Spivak. (2003). A conversation with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Politics and the imagination. Signs, 28(2), 609–624.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1995.76. Swedish government official reports. Integration Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1998:6. Swedish government official reports. Because the power is yours, final report from the Swedish Committee on the distribution of power between women and men [Ty makten är din. Slutbetänkande från utredningen av ekonomisk makt mellan kvinnor och män Fritzes]. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. London: The Women’s Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1985). Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In R. Guha & G. C. Spivak (Eds.), Selected subaltern studies (pp. 3–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. (2013). To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Signs, 38(4), 993–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widerberg, K. (2017). Ulrika Dahl, Marianne Liljeström och Ulla Manns. The geopolitics of nordic and Russian gender research 1975–2005. Genusvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 38(4), 86‒88.
   Google Scholar
• Winant, H., & Omi, M. (1994). Racial formation and hegemony. Global and local developments. In A. Rattansi & S. Westwood (Eds.), Racism, modernity and identity. On the Western front (pp. 266‒289). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, O. E. (2012). Envisioning real Utopias. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Yarbro-Bejarano, Y. (2001). The wounded heart: Writing on Cherríe Moraga. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1994). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. Signs, 19(3), 713‒738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar