Feminist Perspectives on the Economy within Transforming Nordic Welfare States

References

• Adkins, L., Kortesoja, M., Mannevuo, M., & Ylöstalo, H. (2019). Experimenting with price: Crafting the new social contract in Finland. Critical Sociology, 45(4–5), 683–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, I. (2003). Neo-liberal governance and the reprivatization of social reproduction: Social provisioning and shifting gender orders. In I. Bakker & S. Gill (Eds.), Power, production and social reproduction: Human insecurity in the global political economy (pp. 66–82). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bargawi, H., Cozzi, G., & Himmelweit, S. (2017). Economics and austerity in Europe. Gendered impacts and sustainable alternatives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, C. (1991). Corporatism and gender equality: A comparative study of two Swedish labour market organisations. European Journal of Political Research, 20(2), 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchorst, A., & Siim, B. (2002). The women-friendly welfare states revisited. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 10(2), 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Borchorst, A., & Siim, B. (2008). Woman-friendly policies and state feminism: Theorizing Scandinavian gender equality. Feminist Theory, 9(2), 207–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaghan, R. (2017). The gender politics of EU economic policy: Policy shifts and contestations before and after the crisis. In J. Kantola & E. Lombardo (Eds.), Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality (pp. 49–71). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elomäki, A. (2019). Governing austerity: Governance reforms as facilitators of gendered austerity in Finland. Australian Feminist Studies, 34(100), 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elomäki, A., & Ylöstalo, H. (2018). Tasa-arvoa talousarvioon. Talousarvion sukupuolivaikutusten arviointi ja sukupuolitietoinen budjetointi. Valtioneuvoston tutkimus- ja selvitystoiminnan julkaisusarja 52/2018. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, H. (1987). Welfare state and woman power: Essays in state feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, A., & Kananen, J. (2013). Seize the moment: Financial crisis and the making of the Finnish competition state. New Political Economy, 18(6), 811–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and the politics of the economic crisis in Europe. In J. Kantola & E. Lombardo (Eds.), Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality (pp. 1–25). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karamessini, M., & Rubery, J. (2014). Economic crisis and austerity. In M. Karamessini & J. Rubery (Eds.), Women and austerity: The economic crisis and the future for gender equality (pp. 314–352). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, S., Tuori, S., Irni, S., & Mulinari, D. (Eds.). (2016). Complying with colonialism. Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klatzer, E., & Schlager, C. (2019). Losing grounds. Masculine-authoritarian reconfigurations of power structures in the European Union. In S. Wöhl, E. Springler, M. Pachel, & B. Zeilinger (Eds.), The state of the European Union. Fault lines in European integration (pp. 45–75). Wiesbaden: Springer VL.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2018). The corporatist regime, welfare state employment, and gender pay inequity. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(1), 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63(1), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsdottir, T. K. (2013). Iceland in crisis. Gender equality and social equity. In M. Karamessini & J. Ruber (Eds.), Women and austerity. The economic crisis and the future of gender equality (pp. 102–122). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vachhani, S. J., & Pullen, A. (2019). Ethics, politics and feminist organizing: Writing feminist infrapolitics and affective solidarity into everyday sexism. Human Relations, 72(1), 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaittinen, T. (2017). The global biopolitical economy of needs: Transnational entanglements between ageing Finland and the Global nurse reserve of the Philippines (Doctoral dissertation), Tapri Studies in Peace and Conflict Research 103. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis, Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (2015). Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2020). Global gender gap report 2020. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar