2,987
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Involving Men: The Multiple Meanings of Female Genital Mutilation in a Minority Migrant Context

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 287-301 | Received 23 Jul 2019, Accepted 18 Jun 2020, Published online: 27 Jul 2020

References

  • Akinsulure-Smith, A., & Chu, T. (2017). Knowledge and attitudes toward female genital cutting among West African male immigrants in New York City. Health Care for Women International, 38(5), 463–477.
  • Alcaraz-Reig, M., González, J., & Solano Ruiz, C. (2014). Attitudes towards female genital mutilation. International Nursing Review, 61(1), 25–34.
  • Axelsson, T. K., & Strid, S. (2019). Minority migrant men’s attitudes toward female genital mutilation: Developing strategies to engage men. Health Care for Women International. doi:10.1080/07399332.2019.1687707
  • Balfour, J., Abdulcadir, J., Lale, S., & Hindin, M. (2016). Interventions for healthcare providers to improve treatment and prevention of female genital mutilation: A systematic review. BMC Health Services, 16(409), 1–6.
  • Berg, R. C., & Denison, E. (2013). Tradition in transition: Factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting. Health Care for Women International, 34(10), 837–895.
  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Carlson, J., Casey, E., Edleson, J. L., Tolman, R. M., Neugut, T. B., & Kimball, E. (2015). Strategies to engage men and boys in violence prevention. Violence against Women, 21(11), 1406–1425.
  • Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6),829–859. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
  • CRC (The Combahee River Collective). 1977. Statement. Retrieved from www.circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html
  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 89(1), 139–167.
  • Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Rapport, F. (2007). Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: Researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 102–112.
  • Elam, G., & Fenton, K. (2003). Researching sensitive issues and ethnicity: Lessons from sexual health. Ethnicity & Health, 8(1), 15–27.
  • EP (European Parliament). (2012). Resolution on ending female genital mutilation (2012/2684(RSP)).  Brussels: European Parliament.
  • Essen, B., & Johnsdotter, S. (2004). Female genital mutilation in the West: Traditional circumcision versus genital cosmetic surgery. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(7), 611–613.
  • European Commission. (2013). Communication towards the elimination of female genital mutilation (COM(2013) 833 final). Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fabiano, P., Perkins, H. W., Berkowitz, A. B., Linkenbach, J., & Stark, C. (2004). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52(3), 105–112.
  • Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358–377.
  • Flood, M. (2015). Work with men to end violence against women: A critical stocktake. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 159–176.
  • Gangoli, G., Gill, A., Mulvihill, N., & Hester, M. (2018). Perception and barriers: Reporting FGM. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10(4), 251–260.
  • Gele, A., Johansen, E., & Sundby, J. (2012b). When female circumcision comes to the West: Attitudes toward the practice among Somali immigrants in Oslo. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 697.
  • Gele, A., Kumar, B., Hjelde, K., & Sundby, J. (2012a). Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 7–17.
  • Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1). doi:10.1017/S1537592707070065
  • Hearn, J. (2012). A multi-faceted power analysis of men’s violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Sociological Review, 60(4), 589–610.
  • Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
  • Isman, E., Ekéus, C., & Berggren, V. (2013). Perceptions and experiences of female genital mutilation after immigration to Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2013(4), 93–98.
  • Jewkes, R., Flood, K. M., & Lang, J. (2015a). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589.
  • Jewkes, R., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., Lundqvist, E., Blackbeard, D., Lindegger, G., … Gottzén, L. (2015b). Hegemonic masculinity: Combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 96–111.
  • Johansson, T. (2004). Faderskapets Omvandlingar. Frånvarons Socialpsykologi [Transformations of Fatherhood. The Social Psychology of Absence]. Gothenburg: Daidalos.
  • Johnsdotter, S. (2002). Created by God: How Somalis in Swedish exile reassess the practice of female circumcision. Lund: Lund University.
  • Johnsdotter, S., & Essén, B. (2016). Cultural change after migration: Circumcision of girls in Western migrant communities. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 32, 15–25.
  • Johnsdotter, S., & Mestre, R. M. (2017). ’Female genital mutilation’ in Europe: Public discourse versus empirical evidence. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 51, 14–23.
  • Johnsdotter, S., Moussa, K., Carlbom, A., Aregai, R., & Essén, B. (2009). Never my daughters. Health Care for Women International, 30(1–2), 114–133.
  • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302.
  • Kitzinger, J., & Farquhar, C. (1999). The analytical potential of ‘sensitive moments’ in focus group discussions. In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice(pp. 1–20). London: Sage.
  • Lykke, N. (2003). Intersektionalitet – Ett användbart begrepp för genusforskningen. Kvinnovetenskaplig Tidskrift, 1(3), 47–56.
  • Mergaert, L., Arnaut, C., Exterkate, M., O’Brien, S., Strid, S., & Leye, E. (2015). Estimation of girls at risk of female genital mutilation in the European Union. Luxembourh: Publications Office of the EU.
  • National Board of Health and Welfare. (2015). Flickor och kvinnor i Sverige som kan ha varit utsatta för könsstympning [Girls and women in Sweden who may have been subjected to FGM]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
  • Njambi, W. N. (2004). Dualisms and female bodies in representations of African female circumcision: A feminist critique. Feminist Theory, 5(3), 281–303.
  • Obermeyer, C. M. (2005). The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: An update on the evidence. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(5), 443–461.
  • Pease, B. (2008). Engaging men in men’s violence prevention: Exploring the tensions, dilemmas and possibilities. Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse.
  • Pedwell, C. (2007). Theorizing ‘African’ female genital cutting and ‘Western’ body modifications: A critique of the continuum and analogue approaches. Feminist Review, 86(1), 45–66.
  • Shell-Duncan, B., & Hernlund, Y. (2000). Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: Dimensions of the practice and debates. In B. Shell-Duncan & Y. Hernlund (Eds.). Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: Culture, controversy, and change(pp. 1–40). London: Rienner Publishers.
  • Strid, S. (2020). Betydelser av könsstympning hos migrerade minoriteter i Sverige. En feministisk våldsforskningsanalys [Meanings of female genital mutilation among migrant minorities in Sweden. A feminist violence studies analysis]. Sociologisk Forskning, 57(2), 141–163.
  • Strid, S., Walby, S., & Armstrong, J. (2013). Intersectionality and multiple inequalities: Visibility in British policy on violence against women. Social Politics, 20(4), 558–581.
  • Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • UN. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. UN General Assembly resolution 44/25. Geneva: UNCHR.
  • UN. (2016). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern. New York: UNICEF.
  • Varol, N., Turkmani, S., Black, K., Hall, J., & Dawson, A. (2015). The role of men in abandonment of female genital mutilation: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1034.
  • Walby, S., Armstrong, J. E., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240.
  • WHO. (2007). Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. Geneva: WHO.
  • WHO. (2016). Health risks of female genital mutilation. Geneva: WHO.
  • Wikan, U. (2004). En fråga om heder [A question of honour]. Stockholm: Ordfront.