Studying Intimacies that Matter: Affective Assemblages in Research Interviews with Forced Migrants

References

• Åhäll, L. (2018). Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2000). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2014). Cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., & Mohanty, C. T. (eds.). (1997). Feminist geneologies. Colonial legacies, democratic futures. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (Eds.). (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. (2003). I. Interviewing: Embodied communication. Feminism & Psychology, 13(2), 229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Introduction: Deleuze and research methodologies. In R. Coleman & J. Rignrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 1–21). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Del Busso, L. (2007). III. Embodying feminist politics in the research interview: Material bodies and reflexivity. Feminism & Psychology, 17(3), 309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1986/1988). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus (Brian Massumi, Trans.). Athlone: London.
   Google Scholar
• Dragojlovic, A. (2015). Affective geographies: Intergenerational hauntings, bodily affectivity and multiracial subjectivities. Subjectivity, 8(4), 315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2018). Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 981–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2010). Differences disturbing identity. Deleuze and feminism. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences (pp. 101–111). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2015). Affect and feminist methodology, or what does it mean to be moved? In D. Sharma & F. Tygstrup (Eds.), Structures of feeling: Affectivity and the study of culture (pp. 78–83). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hiitola, J. (2019). Locating forced migrants’ resources: Residency status and the process of family reunification in Finland. Social Inclusion, 7(4), 190–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Data-as-machine: A deleuzian becoming. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 111–124). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, B. T., & Stage, C. (2015). Introduction: Affective methodologies. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective methodologies (pp. 1–22). London: Palgrave Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, U. (2017). Researching forced migration: Critical reflections on research ethics during fieldwork. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lahti, A. (2018). Listening to old tapes. Affective intensities and gendered power in bisexual women’s and ex-partners’ relationship assemblages. In T. Juvonen & M. Kolehmainen (Eds.), Affective inequalities in intimate relationships (pp. 49–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liljeström, M., & Paasonen, S. (2010). Introduction. Feeling differences – Affect and feminist reading. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences (pp. 1–7). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164–183). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, D. (2006). Translocal circulation: Place and subjectivity in an extended Filipino community. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 7(3), 197–202.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, C., Schmulyar Gréen, O., & Höjer, I. (2020). The role of reciprocity in transnational care towards children. In J. Hiitola, K. Turtiainen, M. Tiilikainen, & S. Gruber (Eds.), Family life in transition. Borders, transnational mobility and welfare society in nordic countries (pp. 95–106). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parreñas, R. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedwell, C. (2012). Affective (self-) transformations: Empathy, neoliberalism and international development. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittaway, E., Linda, B., & Richard, H. (2010). ‘Stop stealing our stories’: The ethics of research with vulnerable groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2010(2), 229–251.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virokangas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability – A literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A., & Velayutham, S. (2017). Transnational affect and emotion in migration research. International Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar