Sweden’s Development Policy Since 1990: A Policy Paradigm Shift Waiting to Happen?

References

• Alizada, N., et al., 2021, ‘Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021’. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Batista, Mariana, 2018, ‘Who gets what and how does it matter? Importance-weighted portfolio allocation and coalition support in Brazil’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 99–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, A., U. Lundberg and M. Tydén, 2021, En svindlande uppgift. Sverige och biståndet 1945-1975, Stockholm, Sweden: Ordfront Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, N. and T. Larue, 2016, ‘The reparliamentarization of Sweden? The use and relevance of parliamentary resolutions to the government (in Swedish)’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, Vol. 118, No. 3, pp. 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S., N. Connelly and T. G. Weiss, 2017, ‘Sweden’s Financing of UN Funds and Programmes: Analyzing the Past, Looking to the Future’, EBA report 2017:11, Expert Group for Aid Studies, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus and Patrick Dumont, 2011, ‘Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 50, pp. 441–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, J., 1998, Swedish Aid for Poverty Reduction: A History of Policy and Practice, Working Paper 107, April 1998, London, UK: Overseas Development Institute, ODI.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, J. and L. Wohlgemuth, 2000, Learning in Development Co-operation, EGDI Studies Series 2000:2, Expert Group on Development Issues, Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Delputte, S. and J. Orbie, 2020, ‘Paradigm shift or reinventing the wheel? Towards a research agenda on change and continuity in EU development Policy’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 234–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, S., 2021, States, Markets, and Foreign Aid, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, Geske, 2018, ‘Budget Support, Poverty and Corruption: A Review of the Evidence’. EBA report 2018:04, Expert Group for Aid Studies, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• EBA, 2018, ‘Who makes the decisions on Swedish aid funding? An overview’, EBA Rapport 2018:05, Expert Group for Aid Studies, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ekengren, A.-M., H. Oscarsson, et al., 2021, Biståndsviljan försvagas, in U. Andersson, ed, Ingen anledning till oro(?), Sweden: University of Gothenburg, the SOM Institute, pp. 345–360.
   Google Scholar
• Ekengren, A.-M., H. Oscarsson, et al., 2013, Svensk biståndsopinion 1987–2012, in L. Weibull, ed, Vägskäl, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, the SOM Institute, pp. 597–620.
   Google Scholar
• Forss, K., B. Cracknell and N. Strömquist, 1998, ‘Organisational Learning in Development Co-operation: How Knowledge is Generated and Used’, EGDI Working Paper 1998:3, Expert Group on Development Issues, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• ForumCiv, 2022, Vad tycker partierna om avräkningar från biståndet? https://www.forumciv.org/sv/aktuellt/vad-tycker-partierna-om-avrakningar-fran-bistandet, questionnaire 20 May 2022, accessed 1 July 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Grafström, M. and K. Windell, 2019, Skandaler, opinioner och anseende: Biståndet i ett medialiserat samhälle, EBA-report 2019:01, Expert Group for Aid Studies (EBA), Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, R. 2015, Concentration Difficulties? An Analysis of Swedish Aid Proliferation, EBA-report 2015:03, Expert Group for Aid Studies (EBA), Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., 1993, ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hveem, H. and D. McNeill, 1994, Is Swedish Aid Rational? A Critical Study of Swedish Aid Policy in the Period 1968-1993. Ds 1994:75, Report 2, Secretariat for Analysis of Swedish Development Assistance (SASDA), Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Jerneck, M., A. Sannerstedt and M. Sjödin, 1988, ‘Internationalization and parliamentary decision-making: The case of Sweden 1970-1985’, Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 169–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, A. M., 2020, ‘Paradigmeskiftet i dansk udviklingspolitik’, Politica, Vol. 2, pp. 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, A. and A. Sherriff, 2017, Making Waves, EBA-report 2017:01, Expert Group for Aid Studies (EBA), Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Karl-Anders, 2018, The rise and fall of budget support in Swedish development cooperation, EBA Working Paper, October 2018, Expert Group for Aid Studies, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Larue, T., 2022, Riksdagspartierna och biståndet: konflikt eller konsensus? Underlagsrapport, juni 2022, Expertgruppen för biståndsanalys (EBA), Sverige.
   Google Scholar
• Niño-Zarazúa, M., R. M. Gisselquist, A. Horigoshi, M. Samarin and K. Sen, 2020, ‘Effects of Swedish and International Democracy Aid’, EBA Report 2020:07, Expert Group for Aid Studies (EBA), Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Novus, 2022, Rapport: Viktigaste politiska frågan, 2022-03-08, Novus Group International AB.
   Google Scholar
• Odén, Bertil, 2006, Biståndets idéhistoria. Från Marshallhjälp till milleniemål, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Odén, Bertil, 2013, Biståndspolitiken, Ch. 2, in D. Tarschys and M. Lemne, ed, Vad staten vill. Mål och ambitioner i svensk politik, Möklinta, Stockholm, Sweden: Gidlunds Förlag, pp. 21–66.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2021, ‘Frequently asked questions on the ODA eligibility of COVID-19 related activities’, Updated March 2021. https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/ODA-eligibility_%20of_COVID-19_related_activities_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisionsverket, 1988, Lär sig SIDA? En granskning av SIDAs förmåga att lära sig av erfarenheterna, Revisionsrapport 1988-11-09, Stockholm, Sweden: Riksrevisionsverket.
   Google Scholar
• SOM-institute, 2021, The SOM Institute Cumulative Dataset 1986-2020 v2021.1. University of Gothenburg: SOM Institute, www.gu.se/en/som-institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke, O., 2019, International Development Assistance: Policy Drivers and Performance, EADI Global Development Series, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sundström, Göran, 2022, Brutet förvaltningskontrakt. Om metastyrning av svensk biståndsförvaltning, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Tarschys, D., 2020, Biståndets förvaltningskostnader För stora? Eller kanske för små?, Rapport 2020:03, Expertgruppen för biståndsanalys (EBA) Sverige.
   Google Scholar
• Vähämäki, J., 2018, ‘The Rise and Fall of ‘Results Initiatives’ in Swedish Development Aid’, EBA Development Dissertation Brief 2018:02, Expert Group for Aid Studies, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., 2015, ‘Puzzling and powering in policy paradigm shifts: politicization, depoliticization and social Learning’, Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar