Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale

References

• Eklund M, Bäckström M. A model of subjective quality of life for outpatients with schizophrenia and other psychoses. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1157–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton D, Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Empowerment, self and engagement in day center occupations: a longitudinal study among people with long-term mental illness. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 5]; [10 p.]. DOI:10.1080/11038128.2017.1397742
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrey WC, Mueser KT, McHugo GH, et al. Self-esteem as an outcome measure in studies of vocational rehabilitation for adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt DP, Allik J. Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair SJ, Blais MA, Gansler DA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Eval Health Prof. 2010;33:56–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafarodi RW, Milne AB. Decomposing global self-esteem. J Pers. 2002;70:443–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Dong N. Factor structures of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. A Metaanalysis of Pattern Matrices. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:132–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay MT, Boduszek D, Harvey SA. The Rosenberg self-esteem scale: a bifactor answer to a two-factor question? J Pers Assess. 2014;96:654–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth U, Trzesniewski KH, Robins RW. Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: a cohort-sequential longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98:645–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tuijl LA, Glashouwer KA, Bockting CL, et al. Implicit and explicit self-esteem in current, remitted, recovered, and comorbid depression and anxiety disorders: the NESDA study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörgaard K, Jyrki Heikkilä J, Hansson L, et al. Self-esteem in persons with schizophrenia. A Nordic multicentre study. J Ment Health. 2009;11:405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Chung ML, Bakas T, Plue LD, et al. Effects of self-esteem, optimism, and perceived control on depressive symptoms in stroke survivor-spouse dyads. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31:E8–E16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz E, Skarsater I, Nevonen L. Self-esteem in patients treated for anorexia nervosa. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2009;18:318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nima AA, Rosenberg P, Archer T, et al. Anxiety, affect, self-esteem, and stress: mediation and moderation effects on depression. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson D, Dahlstom O, Priebe G, et al. Polytraumatization in an adult national sample and its association with psychological distress and self-esteem. Brain Behav. 2015;5:62–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Erlandsson L-K. Return to work outcomes of the Redesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) program for women with stress-related disorders-a comparative study. Women Health. 2011;51:676–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentzell E, Hultqvist J, Neil S, et al. Measuring personal recovery – psychometric properties of the Swedish Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver J, Huxley P, Bridges K, Mohamad H. Quality of life and mental health services. London: Routledge; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Tjörnstrand C, Sandlund M, et al. Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) for people with severe mental illness was effective for activity engagement and level of functioning – an RCT study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson L, Lexen A, Holmen J. The effectiveness of narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy: a randomized controlled study of a self-stigma intervention. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:1415–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanos PT, Roe D, Lysaker PH. Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy: a new group-based treatment for internalized stigma among persons with severe mental illness. Int J Group Psychother. 2011;61:577–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver JP, Huxley PJ, Priebe S, et al. Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Hansson L, Ahlqvist C. The importance of work as compared to other forms of daily occupations for wellbeing and functioning among persons with long-term mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40:465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, et al. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45:7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman T, Svensson B. Quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Reliability and validity of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Nord J Psychiatry. 2005;59:302–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Sandlund M. The life situation of people with persistent mental illness visiting day centers: a comparative study. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:592–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlin LI, Menaghan EG, Lieberman MA, et al. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22:337–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall GN, Lang EL. Optimism, self-mastery, and symptoms of depression in women professionals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59:132–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majer JM, Jason LA, Olson BD. Optimism, abstinence self-efficacy, and self-mastery: a comparative analysis of cognitive resources. Assessment. 2004;11:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Erlandsson LK, Hagell P. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in people with mental illness and healthy people. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;66:380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, et al. The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tungström S, Söderberg P, Armelius B-Å. Relationships between the global assessment of functioning and other DSM axes in routine clinical work. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:439–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatnaland T, Vatnaland J, Friis S, et al. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115:326–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Backstrom M. Factor structure and construct validity of the Worker Role Self-assessment (WRS) when used for people with psychiatric disabilities in Sweden. Eval Health Prof. 2016;39:299–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastberg BA, Haglund L, Eklund M. Psychometric properties of the Worker Role Self-assessment instrument used to evaluate unemployed people in Sweden. Scand J Occup Ther. 2009;16:238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wampold BE. The great psychotherapy debate: models, methods, and findings. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Bäckström M, Hansson L. Personality and self-variables: important determinants of subjective quality of life in schizophrenia out-patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;108:134–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M. Exploring quality of life as an intervention outcome: the example of women with stress-related disorders participating in work rehabilitation. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claassens L, Terwee CB, Deeg DJ, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing the perceived control in health care among older adults with care needs in the Netherlands. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:859–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Core System User’s Guide Chicago [IL]: IBM. Available from: ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/23.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Core_System_User_Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maddux RE, Lundh LG, Backstrom M. The Swedish Depressive Personality Disorder Inventory: psychometrics and clinical correlates from a DSM-IV and proposed DSM-5 perspective. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;66:167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe S, Kaiser W, Huxley PJ, et al. Do different subjective evaluation criteria reflect distinct constructs? J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:385–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladman B, Waghorn G. Personal experiences of people with serious mental illness when seeking, obtaining and maintaining competitive employment in Queensland, Australia. Work. 2016;53:835–843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes RL, McGrath JJ. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with schizophrenia and related conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;CD000968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, et al. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013;76:913–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar