Revising the Self-Harm Antipathy Scale: validation among staff in psychiatric healthcare in Sweden

References

• Odelius C, Ramklint M. En nationell kartläggning av förekomsten av självskadande beteende hos patienter inom barn & ungdoms- och vuxenpsykiatrin [A national survey of the prevalence of self-harm behaviour in patients within child- and adolescent- and adult psychiatry]. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2014. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Holth F, Walby F, Røstbakken T, et al. Extreme challenges: psychiatric inpatients with severe self-harming behavior in Norway: a national screening investigation. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:605–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjärehed J, Wångby-Lundh M, Lundh LG. Non-suicidal self-injury in a community sample of adolescents: subgroups, stability, and associations with psychological difficulties. J Res Adolesc. 2012;22:678–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westling S, Liljedahl S, Holmqvist Larsson M, et al. Rekommendationer för insatser vid självskadebeteende: nationellt kvalitetsdokument för psykiatrin [Recommendations for interventions for self-harm behaviour]. 2nd ed. Lund: Swedish National Self-Injury Project; 2016. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Self-harm in over 8s: long-term management (National clinical guideline; no. 133). London (UK): NICE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• The National Self-Injury Project – our assignment [Internet]. Stockholm: Swedish National Self-Injury Project; [cited 2018 Sep 26]. Available from: http://nationellasjalvskadeprojektet.se/english/
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Self-harm (Standard no. QS34). London (UK): NICE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• SHEDO – hem [Internet]. SHEDO; [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: http://www.shedo.se/
   Google Scholar
• Högberg T, Magnusson A, Ewertzon M, et al. Attitudes towards mental illness in Sweden: adaptation and development of the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness questionnaire. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17:302–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske ST. Social beings: core motives in social psychology. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2014. Chapter 6, Attitudes and persuasion: changing hearts and minds; p. 223–271.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders KEA, Hawton K, Fortune S, et al. Attitudes and knowledge of clinical staff regarding people who self-harm: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;139:205–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Åkerman S. Patienters upplevelser av vården för självskadebeteende [Patients’ experiences of healthcare for self-harm]. [place unknown]: Psykiatri Skåne; 2012. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Karman P, Kool N, Poslawsky IE, et al. Nurses’ attitudes towards self-harm: a literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford T, Geraghty W, Street K, et al. Staff knowledge and attitudes towards deliberate self-harm in adolescents. J Adolesc. 2003;26:619–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman T, Newton C, Coggan C, et al. Predictors of A&E staff attitudes to self-harm patients who use self-laceration: influence of previous training and experience. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:273–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann T, Clark E, McConnachie S, et al. Accident and emergency nurses’ attitudes towards patients who self-harm. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006;14:4–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickinson T, Hurley M. Exploring the antipathy of nursing staff who work within secure healthcare facilities across the United Kingdom to young people who self-harm. J Adv Nurs. 2011;60:147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson P, Whittington R, Bogg J. Testing the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at changing attitudes to self-harm. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007;14:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren BM, Wilstrand C, Gilje F, et al. Struggling for hopefulness: a qualitative study of Swedish women who self-harm. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11:284–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rissanen ML, Kylmä J, Laukkanen E. Descriptions of self-mutilation among Finnish adolescents: a qualitative descriptive inquiry. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008;29:145–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helleman M, Lundh LG, Liljedahl SI, et al. Individuals’ experiences with brief admission during the implementation of the brief admission skåne RCT, a qualitative study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson P, Whittington R, Bogg J. Measuring nurse attitudes towards deliberate self-harm: the Self-Harm Antipathy Scale (SHAS). J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007;14:438–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson P. Self harm: experiences and attitudes to care [dissertation]. Liverpool: University of Liverpool; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon M, O’Tuathail C. Measuring emergency department nurses’ attitudes towards deliberate self-harm using the Self-Harm Antipathy Scale. Int Emerg Nurs. 2012;20:3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon C, Lee E. Testing the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure nurses’ antipathy towards patients who self-harm: Korean version of the Self-Harm Antipathy Scale. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2017;14:194–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimi A, Katayama H. Statistical validation of the Self-Harm Antipathy Scale-Japanese Version (SHAS-J). J Nurs Care. 2017;06 :434.
   Google Scholar
• Högberg T, Magnusson A, Lützén K, et al. Swedish attitudes towards persons with mental illness. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;66:86–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen E, Townsend E. Public perceptions of self-harm: a test of an attribution model of public discrimination. Stigma Health. 2018;3:204–218.
   Google Scholar
• Soley-Bori M. Dealing with missing data: key assumptions and methods for applied analysis. Boston: Boston University; 2013. (School of Public Health technical report; no. 4).
   Google Scholar
• Myers TA. Goodbye, listwise deletion: presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Commun Methods Meas. 2011;5:297–310.
   Google Scholar
• Roth PL, Switzer FS, Switzer DM. Missing data in multiple item scales: a Monte Carlo analysis of missing data techniques. Organ Res Methods. 1999;2:211–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paidéia. 2012;22:423–432.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004. Chapter 1, Introduction to factor analysis; p. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley AE, Scandura TA, Schriesheim CA, et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. J Organiz Behav. 1997;18:667–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mueller CW. Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical analysis. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1978. Chapter 3, Methods of rotation; p. 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Global fit testing. In: Kline RB, editor. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 4th ed. New York (NY): Guilford Publications; 2015. p. 262–299.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski CJ. On the effects of non-normality on the distribution of the sample product-moment correlation coefficient. J R Stat Soc. 1972;21:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Healey JF. Statistics: a tool for social research. 10th ed. Stamford (CT): Cengage Learning; 2015. Chapter 12, Bivariate association for nominal- and ordinal-level variables; p. 308–341.
   Google Scholar
• Healey JF. Statistics: a tool for social research. 10th ed. Stamford (CT): Cengage Learning; 2015. Chapter 13, Association between variables measured at the interval-ratio level; p. 342–378.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105:399–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Chapter 5, Selecting the items; p. 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd; 2010. Chapter 15, Factor analysis; p. 181–202.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International (UK) Ltd; 2010. Chapter 11, Correlation; p. 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen JW. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. Chapter 3, The significance of a product moment rs; p. 75–107.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson M, Nilsson T, Johansson H, et al. Psychometric analysis of the Swedish panic disorder severity scale and its self-report version. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2010. Chapter 5, He, she, and (s)he; p. 135–185.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Haerpfer C, Moreno A, et al. (eds.). World values survey: round six - country-pooled datafile version [dataset]. World Values Survey Database [Internet]; 2018 Sep 12 [cited 2019 Jul 15]. Available from: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
   Google Scholar