Patient-reported outcome measures in depression

References

• Moller NP, Ryan G, Rollings J, et al. The 2018 UK NHS digital annual report on the improving access to psychological therapies programme: a brief commentary. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield S, Kellett S, Simmonds-Buckley M, et al. Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021;60(1):1–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krägeloh CU, Czuba KJ, Billington DR, et al. Using feedback from patient-reported outcome measures in mental health services: a scoping study and typology. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(3):224–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray LO, Ritchie MJ, Oslin DW, et al. Enhancing implementation of measurement-based mental health care in primary care: a mixed-methods randomized effectiveness evaluation of implementation facilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Manual. London; NHS; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach C, Lucock M, Iveson S, et al. Evaluating psychological therapies services: a review of outcome measures and their utility. MHLDRP. 2004;1(1):53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Paley G, Cahill J, Barkham M, et al. The effectiveness of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy (PIT) in routine clinical practice: a benchmarking comparison. Psychol Psychother. 2008;81(Pt 2):157–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tranbjerg HM, Lykke E, Marianne Engelbrecht L. 2015. Care package for anxiety disorders: no-show and dropout of standardised, time restricted treatment. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Congress of Pshychiatry.
   Google Scholar
• Clark DM. Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:159–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholt N, Hvenegaard M, Christensen AB, et al. Transdiagnostic versus diagnosis-specific group cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosomat. 2022;91(1):36–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnfred SM, Aharoni R, Hvenegaard M, et al. Transdiagnostic group CBT vs. standard group CBT for depression, social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia/panic disorder: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory Manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio (Texas): Psychological Corporation; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The work and social adjustment scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titov N, Dear BF, McMillan D, et al. Psychometric comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for measuring response during treatment of depression. Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):126–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedersen G, Kvarstein EH, Wilberg T. The work and social adjustment scale: psychometric properties and validity among males and females, and outpatients with and without personality disorders. Personal Ment Health. 2017;11(4):215–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra D, Qureshi A, Henley W, et al. The work and social adjustment scale: reliability, sensitivity and value. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014;18(2):131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mataix-Cols D, Cowley AJ, Hankins M, et al. Reliability and validity of the work and social adjustment scale in phobic disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2005;46(3):223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo J, Moreea O, Lutz W. Different people respond differently to therapy: a demonstration using patient profiling and risk stratification. Behav Res Ther. 2016;79:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryde Christensen A, Svart N, Bokelund H, et al. Therapists' perceptions of individual patient characteristics that may be hindering to group CBT for anxiety and depression. Psychiatry. 2020;83(4):344–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Schuurmans J, et al. Psychotherapy for chronic major depression and dysthymia: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(1):51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick HR, Gartlehner G, Gaynes BN, et al. Comparative benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies in initial treatment of major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351:h6019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer KS, Levy HC, Tolin DF. Remission in CBT for adult anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;61:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar