Music therapy and interactive musical media in the future: Reflections on the subject-object interaction

References

• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Berg-Olsen, E., & Skogdal, E. (2017). E-Songbook—Empowering children through assistive music technology. In T. Haugen & K. I. Skjerdingstad Eds., Children and youth, aesthetics and special needs —An interdisciplinary approach in print. Oslo: Vidar forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, H. B. (2014). Den livsviktige musikken. En kvalitativ undersøkelse om musikk, ungdom og helse [The vitally important music: A qualitative study on music, youth and health]. Ph.D. dissertation, NMH-publications 2014: 9, Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2016). Performing with the other: The relationship of music and machine in live coding. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 12(2), 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Bruscia, K. (2005). Developing theory. In B. Wheeler (Ed.), Music therapy research (pp. 540–551). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, B., & Andersson, A.-P. (2011a). Designing smart textiles for music and health. In Proceedings of Ambience 2011 (Vol. 11, pp.43–52). Borås: Ambience.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, B., & Andersson, A.-P. (2011b). Expanding the role of the instrument. Paper published for NIME (New Instruments for Musical Expression). Conference report for NIME 2011, pp. 511–514. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, B., & Andersson, A.-P. (2014). Designing four generations of “musicking tangibles.”. In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design (Series from the Centre for Music and Health Vol. 8, pp. 1–20). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Thompson, F., Canestro, D., & Bodor, T. (2006). From agency to structure: Analysis of an episode in a facilitation process. Human Relations, 59(4), 533–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, B., & Rio, R. (2004). Implications of technology in music therapy practice and research for music therapy education: A review of literature. Journal of Music Therapy, 41, 282–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, A., Newton, D., & Petroff, J. G. (2008). Assistive technology in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, I. B. (2014). ‘FIELD AND AGENT’: Health and characteristic dualities in the co-creative, interactive and musical tangibles in the RHYME project. In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 8, pp. 119–140). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music. publications 2014: 7, Series from the Centre for music and health, (Vol. 8).
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, S., Hahna, N., Miller, V., & Bonaventura, M. (2013). Setting the scene: An overview of the use of music technology in practice. In W. L. Magee (Ed.), Music technology in therapeutic and health settings (pp. 25–44). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Horgen, T. (2010). Musikk, helse, multifunksjonshemming [Music, health, multiple handicaps]. In K. Stensæth, A. T. Eggen, & R. S. Frisk (Eds.), Musikk, helse, multifunksjonshemming [Music, health, multiple handicaps] Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 3, pp. 5–22). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, U. T. (2012). Vitalitetsformer i musikk og kommunikasjon [Vitality forms in music and communication]. In G. Trondalen & K. Stensæth (Eds.), Musikk, barn, helse [Music, children, health] Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 5, pp. 29–43). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Krout, R. E. (1990). Integrating technology. Music Therapy Perspectives, 8, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, W. L. (Ed.). (2013). Music technology in therapeutic and health settings. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, W. L., & Burland, K. (2008). An exploratory study of the use of electronic music technologies in clinical music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 17(2), 124–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhee, R. (2000). “Paradigm” critique: How to see our task as common, and how to work on it. In S. R. Corman & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nagler, J. (1993). Children in Crisis: Interventions through Music Therapy and Digital Music Technology. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Nordenfelt, L. (1991). Hälsa och värde [Health and values]. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Thales.
   Google Scholar
• Ruud, E. (1998). Music therapy: improvisation, communication, and culture. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ruud, E. (2014). Health affordances of the RHYME artefacts. In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 8, pp. 141–155). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Skånland, M. (2013). Everyday music listening and affect regulation: The role of MP3 players. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 8, 20595. Retrieved 12.10.2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K. (2014a). Music, health, technology and design. (Vol. 8). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music. Series from the Centre for Music and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K. (2017). Responsiveness in music therapy improvisation. A perspective inspired by Mikhail Bakhtin. Dallas, TX: Barcelona Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K. (2015). “Musical dialoguing”: A perspective of Bakhtin’s dialogue on musical improvisation in asymmetric relations. In E. Georgii-Hemming, S. E. Holgersen, Ø. Varkøy, & L. Väkevä (Eds.), Nordic research in music education yearbook (Vol. 16, pp. 209–225). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K., & Eide, I. B. (2016). Umberto Eco’s notions of the “open work” and the “field of possibilities”: New perspectives on music therapy and co-creation? British Journal of Music Therapy, 1(11). doi:10.1177/1359457516678622.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K. (2014b). Potentials and challenges in interactive and musical collaborations involving children with disparate disabilities: A comparison study of how Petronella, with Down syndrome, and Dylan, with autism, interact with ‘WAVE’. In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 8, pp. 67–96). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K. (2014c). “Come sing, dance and relax with me!” Exploring interactive health musicking between a girl with disabilities and her family playing with ‘REFLECT’ (a case study). In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 8, pp. 97–118). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K., & Magee, W. (2016). The future of technology in music therapy. In C. Dileo (Ed.), Envisioning the future of technology in music therapy (pp. 148–158). Philadelphia: Temple University’s Arts and Quality of Life Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K., & Ruud, E. (2014). An interactive technology for health: New possibilities for the field of music and health and for music therapy? A case study of two children with disabilities playing with “ORFI.”. In K. Stensæth (Ed.), Music, health, technology and design: Perspectives from RHYME and other research projects Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 8, pp. 39–66). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Stensæth, K., & Jenssen, D. (2016). Deltagelse - en diskusjon av begrepet [Participation - a discussion of the concept]. In K. Stensæth, S. Fuglestad & V. Krüger (Eds.), I transitt – mellom til og fra. Om musikk og deltagelse i musikkterapi [In transit - between to and fro. On music and participation in music therapy], Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 9, pp. 15–35). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Stige, B. (2004). Community music therapy: Culture, care and welfare. In M. Pavlicevic & G. Ansdell (Eds.), Community music therapy (pp. 91–113). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stige, B., Malterud, K., & Midtgarden, T. (2009). Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(10), 1504–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønsberg, G. E. H. (2010). Improvisasjon i et dialogisk kommunikasjonsperspektiv [Improvisation in a dialogical communication perspective]. In K. Stensæth, A. T. Eggen, & R. S. Frisk (Eds.), Musikk, helse, multifunksjonshemming [Music, health, multiple handicaps] Series from the Centre for Music and Health (Vol. 2, pp. 41–54). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Trondalen, G. (2016). Relational music therapy. An intersubjective perspective. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology than from each other. NY: Basic books.
   Google Scholar