University–industry linkages in the UK: emerging themes and ‘unanswered’ questions

References

• Abramovsky, L. and Simpson, H. (2011) ‘Geographic proximity and firm–university innovation linkages: evidence from Great Britain’, Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 6, pp.949–77. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, M. and Grinevich, V. (2013) ‘The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities’, Research Policy, 42, 2, pp.408–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2009) Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A., Kitson, M. and Ternouth, P. (2008) Universities, Business and Knowledge Exchange, Centre for Business Research, Cambridge and The Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE), London.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. (2001) ‘University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 4, pp.285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah, S.N. (2007) University–Industry Interorganisational Relationships for Technology/Knowledge Transfer: A Systematic Literature Review, Leeds University Business School Working Papers, Vol. 1(4), June.
   Google Scholar
• AURIL (2006) Continuing Professional Development Framework for Knowledge Transfer Practitioners, 3rd edn, December, available from http://www.auril.org.uk/media/Publications/CPD%20Framework%20Version%203%20Final%20Dec%2006.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. and Hospers, G. (2007) ‘The new economic geography of old industrial regions: universities as global/local pipelines’, Environment and Planning C, 25, 5, pp. 779–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIS (2009) Higher Ambitions. The Future of Universities in the Knowledge Economy, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, November, available from http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/WoW/WOW_Docs/Higher-Ambitions.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• BIS (2014) UK Innovation Survey: Highly Innovative Firms and Growth, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, March, available from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/289234/bis-14-643-uk-innovation-survey-highly-innovative-firms-and-growth.pdf [accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, K., D’Este, P. and Neely, A. (2011) ‘Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity’, Research Policy, 40, 1, pp.30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., Neely, A. and Salter, A. (2009) Searching for Talent and Technology: Examining the Attitudes of EPSRC Industrial Collaborators towards Universities, Advanced Institute of Management Research, January.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P. and Salter, A. (2010) ‘Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration’, Research Policy, 39, 7, pp.858–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBI (2009) Stronger Together: Businesses and Universities in Turbulent Times, a report from the CBI Higher Education Task Force, September, available from http://educationandskills.cbi.org.uk/reports/00246/ [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D. and Wright, M. (2005) ‘Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence’, Research Policy, 34, pp.369–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D., Conway, C., Picketing, H., Tennant, J., Chaudhury, S. and Allan, P. (2005) Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development. North East England Case Study Report, The OECD Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE), Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B.R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Pergamon, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, N., Keast, R., Pickernell, D. and Senior, M. (2010) ‘Network structure, knowledge governance and firm performance: evidence from innovation networks and SMEs in the UK’, Growth and Change, 41, 3, pp.337–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, pp.128–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosh, A. and Hughes, A. (2010) ‘Never mind the quality feel the width: university–industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Special Edition, 35, pp. 66–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosh, A., Hughes, A. and Lester, R.K. (2006) UK Plc: Just How Innovative Are We? , Working Paper Series, MIT-IPC-06-009, December, Cambridge–MIT Institute, University of Cambridge and MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, A., Zhang, J.J., Bullock, A. and Milner, I. (2011) Open Innovation Choices – What is British Enterprise Doing? Centre for Business Research and UK–IRC Innovation Centre, June.
   Google Scholar
• Decter, M. (2009) ‘Comparative review of UK–USA industry–university relationships’, Education & Training, 51, 8–9, pp.624–34.
   Google Scholar
• Decter, M., Bennett, D. and Leseure, M. (2007) ‘University to business technology transfer – UK and USA comparisons’, Technovation, 27, 3, pp.145–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P. and Iammarino, S. (2010) ‘The spatial profile of university–business research partnerships’, Papers in Regional Science, 89, 2, pp.335–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007) ‘University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?’, Research Policy, 36, pp.1295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P. and Perkmann, M. (2011) ‘Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 3, pp. 316–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., Tang, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A. and Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2013) ‘The pursuit of academic excellence and business engagement: is it irreconcilable?’, Scientometrics, 95, 2, pp.481–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIUS (2008) Innovation Nation White Paper, 13 March, available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/bis.gov.uk/policies/innovation/white-paper [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, D., Hughes, A., Eyton, D. and Pearce, S. (2012) Growing Value – Business–University Collaboration for the 21st Century, CIHE-UK–IRC Enhancing Value Task Force, December.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1983) ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science’, Minerva, 21, pp.198–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. (2000) ‘The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm’, Research Policy, 29, pp.313–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A. (1998) Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From Paper to the Internet, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, M. and Oughton C. (2006) Innovation in the UK Regions and Devolved Administrations: A Review of the Literature, Final Report for the Department of Trade and Industry and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J. and Puukka, J. (2008) ‘The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: an overview of the opportunities and challenges’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 20, 2, pp.3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Haeussler, C. and Colyvas, J.A. (2011) ‘Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany’, Research Policy, 40, pp.41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., Li, Q.C. and Moffat, J. (2010) The Impact of Higher Education Institution–Firm Knowledge Links on Firm-Level Productivity in Britain, Strathclyde Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 10-18, September.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE (2014a) Higher Education – Business and Community Interaction Survey 2012–2013 (HE–BCI), report on survey, May 2014/10, available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201410/HEFCE2014_10.pdf [accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE (2014b) Annual Report and Accounts 2013–14, available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/about/howweoperate/annualaccounts/annualreport201314.pdf [accessed September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2002) SET for Success – The Supply of People with Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Skills, The Report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ Review, available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/robertsreview_introch1.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2004) Science & Innovation Investment Framework 2004–2014, July, available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/science_innovation_120704.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• HMSO (1993) Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology, May, Cm 2250, London, available from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/271983/2250.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Hotho, J.J., Becker-Ritterspeach, F. and Saka-Helmhout, A. (2011) ‘Enriching absorptive capacity through social interaction’, British Journal of Management, 23, 3, pp.383–401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00749.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. and Edler, J. (2011) ‘Structural innovations: towards a unified perspective?’, Science & Public Policy, 38, 3, pp.157–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. et al. (2009) Impact of Research and Innovation Networks on Regional Competitiveness: The Role of HEIs, Non-Technical Summary, ESRC End of Award Report, RES-171-25-0038, ESRC, Swindon.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J., Ramlogan, R. and Cheng, S.L. (2012) ‘Universities in an open innovation system: a UK perspective’, [in special issue: Open Innovation and HEIs], International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 18, 4, pp.440–56.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., Izushi, H. and Prokop, D. (2010) ‘Regions and university–industry networks: interactions with large R&D performers’, paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference, Pécs, Hungary, May.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., Johnston, A. and Steffenson, R. (2008) ‘Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 2, pp.321–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. and Kitagawa, F. (2012) ‘Regional policy and university knowledge transfer: perspectives from devolved regions in the UK’, Regional Studies, 46, 6, pp.817–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., Prokop, D., Johnson A., Steffenson, R. and Clifton, N. (2011) ‘Small firm–university knowledge networks: evidence from the UK and the US’, paper presented at the Triple Helix IX Conference, Stanford University, California, 11–14 July.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2007) ‘University–industry links and UK science and innovation policy’ in Yusuf, S. and Nabeshima, K. (eds) How Universities Promote Economic Growth, World Bank, Washington DC, pp. 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2011) ‘Open innovation, the Haldane Principle and the new production of knowledge: science policy and university–industry links in the UK after the financial crisis’, Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 29, 4, pp.411–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2010) Connecting with the Ivory Tower: The Business Perspective on Knowledge Exchange in the UK, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2012) ‘Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development’, Cambridge Journal of Economics Special Issue, 36, pp.712–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. and Martin, B. (2012) Enhancing Impact – The Value of Public Sector R&D, CIHE-UK–IRC Enhancing Value Task Force, August.
   Google Scholar
• IPO (2011) Intellectual Asset Management for Universities, available from http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ipasset-management.pdf [accessed June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L., Robinson, S. and Lockett, N. (2010) ‘Recognising “open innovation” in HEI–industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16, 6, pp.540–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, D. (2006) ‘Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: applying entrepreneurship theory to practice’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5, pp.599–603.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, M., et al. (2009a) University-Industry Knowledge Exchange: Demand Pull, Supply Push and the Public Space Role of Higher Education Institution, Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-171-25-0018, ESRC, Swindon.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, M., Howells, J., Braham, R. and Westlake, S. (2009b) The Connected University: Driving Recovery and Growth in the UK Economy, NESTA, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2007) ‘Knowledge networks and careers: academic scientists in industry–university links’, Journal of Management Studies, 44, 6, pp.993–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2010) ‘From “ivory tower traditionalists” to “entrepreneurial scientists”? Academic scientists in fuzzy university–industry boundaries’, Social Studies of Science, 40, pp. 307–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R. (2003) Lambert Review of Business-Industry Collaboration, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2011) ‘Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom’, Regional Studies, 45, 4, pp.507–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H.L. (2007) ‘Universities, innovation, and territorial development: a review of the evidence’, Environment and Planning C, Government & Policy, 25, 1, pp.98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton Smith, H.L. and Bagchi-Sen, S. (2010) ‘Triple helix and regional development: a perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22, 7, pp.805–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch Review of Skills (2006) Prosperity for All in the Global Economic World Class Skills, Final Report, HM Treasury, December.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, R. (2005) Universities, Innovation, and the Competitiveness of Local Economies, a summary report from the Local Innovation Systems Project – Phase I, MIT Industrial Performance Center Working Paper 05-010, MIT, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Meyer, M. (2006) ‘The Triple Helix indicators and knowledge-based innovation systems’, Research Policy, 35, 10, pp.1441–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, A. and Wright, M. (2005) ‘Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies’, Research Policy, 34, pp.1043–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, N., Cave, F., Kerr, R. and Robinson, S. (2009) ‘The influence of co-location in higher education institutions on small firms’ perspectives of knowledge transfer’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21, 3, pp.265–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett, N., Ker, R. and Robinson, S. (2008) ‘Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between higher education institutions and industry’, International Small Business Journal, 26, 6, pp.661–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. and Turner, P. (2010) ‘Entrepreneurial universities – the key ingredient in the recipe for UK innovation? Realities of working in business engagement roles in academia’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation, 11, 4, pp.273–81.
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, A., Meyer, M. and von Tunzelmann, N. (2008) ‘Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, pp.259–83.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, A. (2011) University–Industry Interactions and Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms: A Critical Survey, CEB Working Paper No. 11/015.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., McAdam, M. and Brown, V. (2009) ‘Proof of concept processes in UK university technology transfer: an absorptive capacity perspective’, R&D Management, 39, 2, pp.192–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau E. and Hughes, A. (2014) ‘Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge’, Research Policy, 43, 5, pp.853–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina, A. and Probert, J. (2012) Enhancing Collaboration Creating Value – Business Interaction With The UK Research Base In Four Sectors, CIHE-UK–IRC Enhancing Value Task Force, September.
   Google Scholar
• Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A. and Duran, X. (2002) Measuring Third Stream Activities, final report to the Russell Group of Universities, SPRU, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• PACEC (2012) Strengthening the Contribution of English Higher Education Institutions to the Innovation System: Knowledge Exchange and HEIF Funding, a report for April.
   Google Scholar
• PACEC/CBR (2009) Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Role of HEFCE/OSI Third Stream Funding, report to HEFCE, April 2009/15.
   Google Scholar
• PACEC/CBR (2011) Understanding the Knowledge Exchange Infrastructure in the English Higher Education Sector, report to HEFCE by PACEC and the Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., King, Z. and Pavelin, S. (2011) ‘Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry’, Research Policy, 40, pp.539–52.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. and Sobrero, M. (2013) ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy, 42, pp.423–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. (2007) ‘University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 4, pp. 259–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, P.H. and Siegel, D.S. (2006) ‘The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the US and UK’, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 2, pp.66–144.
   Google Scholar
• Pickernell, D., Clifton, N. and Senyard, J. (2009a) ‘Universities, SMEs and innovation frameworks: think global, act local?’, Industry and Higher Education, 23, 2, pp.79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Pickernell, D., Packham, G., Brooksbank, D. and Jones, P. (2010) ‘A recipe for what? UK universities, enterprise and knowledge transfer’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11, 4, pp.265–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pickernell, D., Packman, G., Smallbone, D., David, M., Christopher, J. and Senyard, J. (2009b) ‘The roles and importance of formal and informal sources of business support in young firms: evidence from the UK’s 2008 Federation of Small Business Survey’, in 32nd Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference, 3–6 November, Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Polt, W., Rammer, C., Gassler, H., Schibany, A. and Schartinger, D. (2001) ‘Benchmarking industry–science relations: the role of framework conditions’, Science and Public Policy, 28, 4, pp.247–58.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M., Robinson, S., Jack, S. and Lockett, N. (2012) ‘Opportunities, contradictions and attitudes: the paradox of university–business engagement since 1960’, Business History, 55, 2, pp.259–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review, Sainsbury (2007) The Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, A., Tartari, V. and D’Este, P. (2010) The Republic of Engagement, AIM Report, August.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, H. and Liu, W. (2010) Emerging Landscape. An Exploratory Study of Management of University Knowledge Transfer Office in the UK, Management School, The University of Liverpool, May.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D., Chapple, W., Wright, M. and Lockett, A. (2008) ‘Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer in the US and UK: a stochastic distance function approach’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 7–8, pp.719–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tartari, V., Perkmann, M. and Salter, A. (2014) ‘In good company: the influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists’, Research Policy, 43, 7, pp.1189–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, V., Salter, A. and D’Este, P. (2012) ‘Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics’ perceptions of the barriers to working with industry’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 3, pp.655–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ternouth, P., Herrmann, K. and Docherty, D. (2010) Absorbing Research. The Role of University Research in Business and Market Innovation, Council for Industry and Higher Education, May.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrichsen, T.C. (2014) Knowledge Exchange Performance and the Impact of HEIF in the English Higher Education Sector, report for HEFCE, April.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (2012) A Review of Business–University Collaboration (The Wilson Review), Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, available from http://www.wilsonreview.co.uk/review/ [accessed 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Witty’s Review of Universities and Growth (2013) Encouraging a British Revolution, October.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) ‘Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation and extension’, The Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, pp.185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar