Embeddedness levels in Central and East European countries as revealed by patent-related indicators

References

• Cameron, H. (1999) ‘Evolving systems of intellectual property rights: collaborative R&D as a generator of new IP structures’ in Inzelt, A. and Hilton, J. (eds) Technology Transfer: From Invention to Innovation, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp.173-93.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. and Park, H. (2014) ‘Mapping Triple Helix innovation in developing and transitional economies: webometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics’, Scientometrics, 99, 1, pp.1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danell, R. and Persson, O. (2003) ‘Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix’, Scientometrics, 58, 2, pp.203–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dyker, A. (ed.) (1999) Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer in the Former Soviet Union, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dyker, A. (2004) Catching Up and Falling Behind: Post-Communist Transformation in Historical Perspective, Imperial College Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The Triple Helix – University–Industry–Government – Innovation in Action, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2011) ‘The Triple Helix: science, technology and the entrepreneurial spirit’, Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 3, 2, pp.76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1995) ‘The Triple Helix – university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development’, EASST Review, 14, 1, pp.14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W. and Schlemmer, B. (2007) ‘National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003). An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix’, Scientometrics, 70, 2, pp.267–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, P. and Pavitt, K. (1987) The Comparative Economics of Research, Development and Innovation in East and West: A Survey, Harwood Academic Publishers, Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. (1995) Review of Recent Developments in Science and Technology in Hungary Since 1991: Summary, CCET/DSTI, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. (1999) ‘Science, technology and innovation: institutional and behavioural conditions for innovative industrial development’ in Widmaier, B. and Potratz, W. (eds) Frameworks for Industrial Policy in Central and Eastern Europe, Ashgate, Aldershot, pp.163–92.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. (2008) ‘The inflow of highly skilled workers into Hungary: a by-product of FDI’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 4, pp.422–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A. (2010) ‘Collaborations in the open innovation era’ in Ekekwe, N. (ed.) Nanotechnology and Microelectronics, IGI Global, Hershey PA, pp.61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Inzelt, A., Soós, K., Valentiny, P. and Ilsinszky, P. (1996) Financial and Other Implications of the Implementation of the TRIPS Agreement for Developing Countries in a Globalizing Economy, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Lecocq, C., Xiaoyan, S., Vereyen, C., Du Plessis, M. and Van Looy, B. (2008) Data Production Methods for Harmonized Patent Statistics: Regionalizing Patent Data – EU-27: Methodological Outline, Eurostat working paper, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., Kushnir, D. and Rafols, I. (2014) ‘Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on international patent classification (IPC)’, Scientometrics, 98, 3, pp.1583–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meske, W. (ed.) (2004) From System Transformation to European Integration, LIT Verlag, Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2000) 'What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations’, Scientometrics, 49, 1, pp.93–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (2012) ‘Triple Helix indicators – a bibliometric perspective’, Hélice, 1, 2, pp.4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T. and Utecht, J. (2003) ‘Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: a study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors’, Scientometrics, 58, 2, pp.321–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1997) National Innovation Systems, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) Patent Statistics Manual, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, O. (2006) ‘Exploring the analytical potential of comparing citing and cited source items’, Scientometrics, 68, 3, pp.561–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. (1999) S&T in Growth and Restructuring of Central and Eastern Europe: The Main Pattern and Factors of Transformation, TSER project paper, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M. and Etzkowitz, H. (2010) ‘Creative reconstruction: a Triple Helix-based innovation strategy in Central and Eastern Europe countries’ in Saad, M. and Zawdie, G. (eds) Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries, Issues and Challenges, Routledge, Abingdon, pp.249–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., Inzelt, A., Godinho, M.M. and Meyer, M. (2009) Production of Data to Analyse University References Found in Patent Documents, by Geographic Origin, Final Report, Erawatch Network, Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., Looy, V., Godinho, M. and Inzelt, A. (2009) Production of Data to Analyse University References Found in Patent Documents, by Geographic Origin, Second Report, Erawatch Network, Brussels.
   Google Scholar