The third sector of R&D: literature review, basic analysis, and research agenda

References

• Arnold, E., Rush, H., Bessant, J. and Hobday, M. (1998) ‘Strategic planning in research and technology institutes’, R&D Management, 28, 2, pp.89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1962) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Barge-Gil, A. and Modrego, A. (2011) ‘The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, pp.61–83.10.1007/s10961-009-9132-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999) ‘Public research and industrial innovations in Germany’, Research Policy, 28, pp.397–422.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2001) Kontrovers och Konsensus. Vetenskap och Politik i Svenskt 1990-tal, Nya Doxa, Nora, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S. and Rickne, A. (2008) ‘Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis’, Research Policy, 37, pp.407–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M. and Hofer, R. (2011) ‘The internationalisation of research and technology organisations (RTOs) - conceptual notions and illustrative examples from European RTOs in China’, Science, Technology and Society, 16, 1, pp.99–122.10.1177/097172181001600106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (2012) Creating the market university. How academic science became an economic engine, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.10.1515/9781400840472
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995) ‘Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer’, Research Policy, 24, pp.97–114.10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienkowska, D., Larsen, K. and Sörlin, S. (2010) ‘Public–private innovation: mediating roles and ICT niches of industrial research institutes’, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12, pp.206–16.10.5172/impp.12.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleda, M. and del Río, P. (2013) ‘The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems’, Research Policy, 42, pp.1039–52.10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, R., Cox, D., Nedeva, M. and Barker, K. (2004) Scrutinising Science. The Changing UK Government of Science, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.10.1057/9781403943934
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005) ‘Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment’, Regional Studies, 39, 1, pp.61–74.10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, D. (1989) An Institute for an Empire. The Psysikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt, 1871-1918, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, IAU Press, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, M. and Bozeman, B. (1998) Limited by Design. R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System, Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Cuhls, K., Bunkowski, A. and Behlau, L. (2012) ‘Fraunhofer future markets: from global challenges to dedicated, technological, collaborative research projects’, Science and Public Policy, 39, pp.232–44.10.1093/scipol/scs018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É. (1893/1997) The Division of Labour in Society, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997) Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. and Hommen, L. (2008) Small Country Innovation Systems. Globalization. Change and Policy in Asia and Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781847209993
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, M. (2007) Adoption of the Innovation System Concept in Sweden, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (1983) ‘Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science’, Minerva, 21, 2–3, pp.198–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Martin, B. and Andersen, E. (2013) Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686346.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. (2005) Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Garnsey, E. (2007) ‘The entrepreneurial university. The idea and its critics’ in Yusuf, S. and Nabeshima, K. (eds) How Universities Promote Economic Growth, World Bank, Paris, pp.227–38.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, A. and Jacobsson, S. (2006) ‘Myths or reality – a scrutiny of dominant beliefs in the Swedish science policy debate’, Science and Public Policy, 33, 5, pp.321–40.10.3152/147154306781778894
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, M. (2011) ‘Research institutes as hybrid organizations: central challenges to their legitimacy’, Policy Science, 44, pp.215–30.10.1007/s11077-011-9128-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, M., Thune, T., Brorstad Borlaug, S. and Hansson, J. (2015) ‘Emerging hybrid practices in public-private research centers’, Public Administration, 93, 2, pp.363–79.10.1111/padm.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. (2016) Big Science Transformed. Science, Politics and Organization in Europe and the United States, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.10.1007/978-3-319-32738-9
   Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. and Heinze, T. (2012) ‘Institutional persistence through gradual adaptation: analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany’, Science and Public Policy, 39, pp.450–63.10.1093/scipol/scs047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. and Heinze, T. (2016) ‘“Preservation of the laboratory is not a mission”. Gradual organizational renewal in national laboratories in Germany and the United States’ in Heinze, T. and Münch, R. (eds) Innovation in Science and Organizational Renewal. Historical and Sociological Perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.117–45.10.1057/978-1-137-59420-4
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R. (2002) ‘Competition and collaboration in German technology transfer’, European Management Journal, 20, 5, pp.470–85.10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00091-9
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2007) ‘Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change’, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, pp.413–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounshell, D. (1996) ‘The evolution of industrial research in the United States’ in Rosenbloom, R. and Spencer, W. (eds) Engines of Innovation: US Industrial Research at the End of an Era, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA, pp.13–73.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (2006) ‘Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation’, Research Policy, 35, pp.715–28.10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (1990) The Kaiser’s Chemists. Science and Modernization in Imperial Germany, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill NC.
   Google Scholar
• Larédo, P. and Mustar, P. (2001) Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Larédo, P. and Mustar, P. (2004) ‘Public sector research: a growing role in innovation systems’, Minerva, 42, pp.11–27.10.1023/B:MINE.0000017698.38154.a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loikkanen, T., Hyytinen, K. and Konttinen, J. (2011) ‘Public research and technology organisations in transition: the case of Finland’, Science, Technology and Society, 16, 1, pp.75–98.10.1177/097172181001600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992) National Systems of Innovation, Anthem Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K., Chaminade, C. and Vang, J. (2009) Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.10.4337/9781849803427
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J. and Truffer, B. (2008) ‘Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework’, Research Policy, 37, pp.596–615.10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1990) Science and Technology in the Federal Republic of Germany, Longman, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Modrego-Rico, A., Barge-Gil, A. and Núnez-Sánchez, R. (2005) ‘Developing indicators to measure technology institutes’ performance’, Research Evaluation, 14, 2, pp.177–84.10.3152/147154405781776229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münch, R. (2014) Academic Capitalism. Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1959) ‘The simple economics of basic scientific research’, Journal of Political Economy, 67, 3, pp.297–306.10.1086/258177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1993) National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nerdrum, L. and Gulbrandsen, M. (2009) ‘The technical-industrial research institutes in the Norwegian innovation system’ in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Verspagen, B. (eds) Innovation, Path Dependency, and Policy: the Norwegian Case, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.327–48.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551552.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. and Moodysson, J. (2015) ‘Regional innovation policy and coordination: illustrations from southern Sweden’, Science and Public Policy, 42, pp.147–61.10.1093/scipol/scu024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noteboom, B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. and Smelser, N. (1956/2010) Economy and Society. A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, I. (2012) Handslaget. Svensk industriell forskningspolitik 1940-1980, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Preissl, B. (2006) ‘Research and technology organizations in the service economy: developing analytical tools for changing innovation patterns’, Innovation, 19, 1, pp.131–45.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. (2010) The Commodification of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, H. (1996) ‘United Kingdom – responding to liberalisation’ in Rush, H., Hobday, M., Bessant, J., Arnold, E. and Murray, R. (eds) Technology Institutes: Strategies for Best Practice, International Thomson Business Press, London, pp.69–89.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, H. and Hobday, M. (1996) ‘Overview’ in Rush, H., Hobday, M., Bessant, J., Arnold, E. and Murray, R. (eds) Technology Institutes: Strategies for Best Practice, International Thomson Business Press, London, pp.1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif, N. (2010) ‘Rhetoric of innovation policymaking in Hong Kong using the innovation systems conceptual approach’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 3, pp.408–34.10.1177/0162243909337120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif, N. and Baark, E. (2011) ‘The transformation of research technology organisations (RTOs) in Asia and Europe’, Science, Technology and Society, 16, 1, pp.1–10.10.1177/097172181001600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776/2012) The Wealth Of Nations, Wordsworth Editions, Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (1990) American Science Policy since World War II, Brookings, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Tether, B. and Tajar, A. (2008) ‘Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base’, Research Policy, 37, pp.1079–95.10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindemans, P. (2009) ‘Postwar research education and innovation policymaking in Europe’ in Delanghe, H., Muldur, U. and Soete, L. (eds) European Science and Technology Policy: Towards Integration Or Fragmentation?, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp.3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Widmalm, S. (2012) ‘Innovation and control: performative research policy in Sweden’ in Rider, S., Hasselberg, Y. and Waluszewski, A. (eds) Transformations in Research, Higher Education and the Academic Market. The Breakdown of Scientific Thought, Springer, Heidelberg, pp.39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, S. (2007) ‘University-industry links: policy dimensions’ in Yusuf, S. and Nabeshima, K. (eds) How Universities Promote Economic Growth, World Bank, Paris, pp.1–26.
   Google Scholar