Managing the transition to open access publishing: a psychological perspective

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985) ‘From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior’ in Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (eds) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Anstey, K., Bahar-Fuchs, A., Herath, P., Rebok, G. and Cherbuin, N. (2013) ‘A 12-week multidomain intervention versus active control to reduce risk of Alzheimer’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial’, Trials, 14, p.60, available from https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/papers/10.1186/1745-6215-14-60 [accessed October 2017].10.1186/1745-6215-14-60
   Google Scholar
• Azagra-Caro, J., Barbera-Tomás, D., Edwards-Schachter, M. and Tur, E. (2017) ‘Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent’, Research Policy, 46, 2, pp.463–74.10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M. and Lawson, C. (2015) ‘The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK’, Research Policy, 44, 6, pp.1160–75.10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977) ‘Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change’, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp.191–215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bernius, S., Hanauske, M., König, W. and Dugall, B. (2009) ‘Open access models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 39, 1, pp.103–16.10.1016/S0313-5926(09)50046-X
   Google Scholar
• Beverungen, A., Böhm, S. and Land, C. (2013) ‘From the open road to the high seas? Piracy, damnation and resistance in academic consumption of publishing’, Prometheus, 31, pp.241–7.
   Google Scholar
• BIS (2011) Innovation and Research Strategy for Growth, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, available from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/229028/8239.pdf [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Neuhaus, C. and Daniel, H.-D. (2010) ‘The effect of a two-stage publication process on the journal impact factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics’, Scientometrics, 86, pp.93–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., Ren, S. and Rousseau, R. (2012) ‘Digital publishing and China’s core scientific journals: A position paper’, Scientometrics, 98, pp.11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, E. and Milloy, C. (2012) ‘A snapshot of attitudes towards open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences - part of the OAPEN-UK project’, Insights, 25, pp.192–7.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P. and Fromerth, M. (2007) ‘Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics papers?’, Scientometrics, 71, 2, pp.203–15.10.1007/s11192-007-1661-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, P., Loh, M. and Mondry, A. (2006) ‘Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model’, Scientometrics, 69, 2, pp.271–86.10.1007/s11192-006-0148-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016) Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World - A Vision for the Future, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels, available from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovation-open-science-open-world-vision-europe [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. and Haworth, N. (2016) ‘Servicing academics and building relationships: the case of two university commercialisation offices in Australia’, R&D Management, 46, pp.653–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaulé, P. and Maystre, N. (2011) ‘Getting cited: Does open access help?’, Research Policy, 40, 10, pp.1332–8.10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S. and Brooks, T. (2010) ‘Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics’, Scientometrics, 84, 2, pp.345–55.10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziotin, D., Wang, X. and Abrahamsson, P. (2014) ‘A framework for systematic analysis of open access journals and its application in software engineering and information systems’, Scientometrics, 101, 3, pp.1627–56.10.1007/s11192-014-1278-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumpenberger, C., Ovalle-Perandones, M.-A. and Gorraiz, J. (2012) ‘On the impact of gold open access journals’, Scientometrics, 96, pp.221–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2010) ‘A commentary on ‘The economic implications of alternative publishing models’’, Prometheus, 28, 1, pp.73–84.10.1080/08109021003676383
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. (2010) ‘The immediate practical implication of the Houghton Report: Provide Green open access now’, Prometheus, 28, 1, pp.55–9.10.1080/08109021003676367
   Google Scholar
• Harvie, D., Lightfoot, G., Lilley, S. and Weir, K. (2013) ‘Publisher, be damned! From price gouging to the open road’, Prometheus, 31, pp.229–39.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE (2014) Policy for Open Access in the Post-2014 Research Excellence Framework, available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201407/ [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. and Oppenheim, C. (2010) ‘The economic implications of alternative publishing models’, Prometheus, 28, 1, pp.41–54.10.1080/08109021003676359
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, H. and Nabavi, M. (2015) ‘Open access and sources of full-text papers in Google Scholar in different subject fields’, Scientometrics, 105, 3, pp.1635–51.10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubb, M., Goldstein, S., Amin, M., Plume, A., Aisati, M., Oeben, S., Aisati, M., Pinfield, S., Bath, P., Salter, J., Johnson, R. and Fosci, M. (2015) Monitoring the Transition to Open Access: a Report for Universities UK Open Access Co-ordination Group, Research Information Network, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kapeller, J. and Steinerberger, S. (2016) ‘Emergent phenomena in scientific publishing: A simulation exercise’, Research Policy, 45, 10, pp.1945–52.10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koler-Povh, T., Južnič, P. and Turk, G. (2014) ‘Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering’, Scientometrics, 98, 2, pp.1033–45.10.1007/s11192-013-1101-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, N. and Leonelli, S. (2016) ‘How does one ‘open’ science? Questions of value in biological research’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 42, pp.280–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, N., Leonelli, S., Weckowska, D., Castle, D. and Dupré, J. (2016) ‘How do scientists understand openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36, 2, pp.128–41.10.1177/0270467616668760
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKiernan, E., Bourne, P., Brown, C., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B., Ram, K., Soderberg, C., Spies, J., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K. and Yarkoni, T. (2016) ‘How open science helps sesearchers succeed’, eLife, available from https://elifesciences.org/papers/16800 [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S., van Stralen, M. and West, R. (2011) ‘The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions’, BMC Implementation Science, 6, p.42, available from https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/papers/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 [accessed October 2017].10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S. and West, R. (2013) ‘Behaviour change theory and evidence: A presentation to government’, Health Psychology Review, 7, 1, pp.1–22.10.1080/17437199.2011.649445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, B. (2009) ‘Scholarly research in LIS open access electronic journals: A bibliometric study’, Scientometrics, 80, 1, pp.167–94.10.1007/s11192-008-2055-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby, K., French, D., Brown, K. and Lecky, D. (2013) ‘Increasing young adults’ condom use intentions and behaviour through changing chlamydia risk and coping appraisals: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of efficacy’, BMC Public Health, 13, 528, available from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-13-528 [accessed October 2017].10.1186/1471-2458-13-528
   Google Scholar
• Neylon, C. (2012) ‘Science publishing: Open access must enable open use’, Nature, 492, 7429, pp.348–9.10.1038/492348a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2009) ‘Motivations for web-based scholarly publishing: Do scientists recognise open availability as an advantage?’, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40, 4, pp.343–69.10.3138/jsp.40.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. and Schildt, H. (2015) ‘Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations’, Research Policy, 44, 5, pp.1133–43.10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. and Sobrero, M. (2013) ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy, 42, 2, pp.423–42.10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCUK (2005) ‘RCUK position statement on access to research outputs’, available from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/2005statement-pdf [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• RCUK (2012) RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance, available from www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/rcukopenaccesspolicy-pdf [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E., Higgs, S., Daley, A., Jolly, K., Lycett, D., Lewis, A. and Aveyard, P. (2013) ‘Development and feasibility testing of a smart phone based attentive eating intervention’, BMC Public Health, 13, 639, available from https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/papers/10.1186/1471-2458-13-639 [accessed October 2017].10.1186/1471-2458-13-639
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Science and Technology Select Committee (2013) The Implementation of Open Access, House of Lords, London, available from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldsctech/122/12202.htm [accessed October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• SHERPA/RoMEO (2017) Publisher Copyright Policies and Self-archiving, available from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php [accessed July 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. and Björk, B. (2012) ‘A study of open access journals using paper processing charges’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63, 8, pp.1485–95.10.1002/asi.v63.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotudeh, H. and Horri, A. (2008) ‘Great expectations: The role of Open Access in improving countries’ recognition’, Scientometrics, 76, 1, pp.69–93.10.1007/s11192-007-1890-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotudeh, H. and Horri, A. (2009) ‘Countries positioning in open access journals system: An investigation of citation distribution patterns’, Scientometrics, 81, 1, pp.7–31.10.1007/s11192-009-1870-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suber, P. (2012) Open Acces, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. (2013) ‘The true cost of science publishing’, Nature, 495, 7442, pp.426–9.10.1038/495426a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W. and Fang, Z. (2015) ‘The open access advantage considering citation, paper usage and social media attention’, Scientometrics, 103, 2, pp.555–64.10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Mao, W., Xu, S. and Zhang, C. (2013) ‘Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications’, Scientometrics, 98, pp.1923–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. and Michie, S. (2010) Behaviour Change: The Importance of Seeing the Whole Picture and A Critique of ‘Nudge’, Submission to Science and Technology Select Committee, ‘Call for Evidence: Behaviour Change’, House of Lords, London, available from http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/science-technology/behaviourchange/BCwrittenevidenceAtoZ.pdf [accessed July 2017].
   Google Scholar