Where is the ‘Social’ in Constructions of ‘Liveability’? Exploring Community, Social Interaction and Social Cohesion in Changing Urban Environments

References

• Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Lu, A., Butterworth, I., Hes, D. & Giles-Corti, B. (2014) Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health, Social Science & Medicine., 111, pp. 64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, J. & Kearns, A. (2013) The function and foundation of urban tolerance: encountering and engaging with difference in the city, Urban Studies, 50(13), pp. 2700–2717.10.1177/0042098013477705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. & Gleeson, B. (2010) Space and place: social exclusion in Australia’s suburban heartland, Urban Policy and Research, 28(2), pp. 135–159.10.1080/08111141003693133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2001) Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, T. (2003) The social dimension of the urban village: a comparison of models for sustainable urban development, Urban Design International, 8(1/2), pp. 53–65.10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000093
   Google Scholar
• Burton, E. (2000) The compact city: just or just compact? a preliminary analysis, Urban Studies, 37(11), pp. 1969–2006.10.1080/00420980050162184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buys, L., Vine, D. & Miller, E. (2013) What makes inner city high density liveable? Insight from residents in Brisbane, Australia, Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 2(1), pp. 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. (2006) Stuck in a cul-de-sac? Suburban history and urban sustainability in Australia, Urban Policy and Research, 24(2), pp. 201–216.10.1080/08111140600704137
   Google Scholar
• de Chazal, J. (2010) A systems approach to livability and sustainability: defining terms and mapping relationships to link desires with ecological opportunities and constraints, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, pp. 585–597.10.1002/sres.v27:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government (2009) Guidance on Meaningful Interaction: How Encouraging Positive Relationships between People Can Help Build Community Cohesion [online]. Available at http://resources.cohesioninstitute.org.uk/Publications/Documents/Document/DownloadDocumentsFile.aspx?recordId=4&file=PDFversion (accessed 9 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Infrastructure and Transport (2011) Our Cities, Our Future: A National Urban Policy for a Productive, Sustainable and Liveable Future [online] (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport). Available at http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/pab/urbanpolicy/index.aspx (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Infrastructure and Transport (2013) State of Australian Cities 2013 [online] (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport. Available at http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure/pab/soac/index.aspx (accessed 19 May, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. & Dupuis, A. (2003) Urban intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: a challenge for new urbanism, Housing Studies, 18(3), pp. 353–368.10.1080/02673030304239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, L., Cerin, E., Leslie, E. & Owen, N. (2007) Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability? Urban Studies, 44(9), pp. 1677–1695.10.1080/00420980701426665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entrikin, J. (1991) The Betweenness of Place (Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press).10.1007/978-1-349-21086-2
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1996) The responsive community: a communitarian perspective, American Sociological Review, 61(1), pp. 1–11.10.2307/2096403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2125–2143.10.1080/00420980120087081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. (2010) Cities for People (Washington, DC: Island Press).
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. (1959) The evaluation of planning: some sociological considerations, International Social Science Journal, 11, pp. 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2004) The Suburbs: Fear in the Tank, Hope of the Horizon [online]. Available at https://griffithreview.com/articles/whats-driving-suburban-australia-fear-in-the-tank-hope-on-the-horizon/ (accessed 10 January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2006) Australian heartlands: making space for hope in the suburbs (Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin).
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, T. J. (1986) Neighborhood and sense of community, Journal of Community Psychology, 14, pp. 341–352.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, A. & Wierzbicki, S. (1999) Social ties at a neighborhood level: two decades of GSS evidence, Urban Affairs Review, 35, pp. 92–111.10.1177/10780879922184301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, C. (2007) Shaping neighborhoods and nature: urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon, Cities, 24(4), pp. 285–297.10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N. & Wellman, B. (2001) Long distance community in the network society: contact and support beyond netville, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), pp. 476–495.10.1177/00027640121957303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, P., Scott, M. & Redmond, D. (2009) Sustainability versus liveability: an investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), pp. 847–864.10.1080/09640560903083798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyra, D. S. (2012) Conceptualizing the new urban renewal: comparing the past to the present, Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), pp. 498–527.10.1177/1078087411434905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ife, J. & Tesoriero, F. (2006) Community Development: Community-based Alternatives in an Age of Globalisation, 3rd edn (Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H., Pratt, A. C. & Wu, P. C. C. (2001) The Secret Life of Cities: The Social Reproduction of Everyday Life (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, M. & Jones, C. A. (2010) Dimensions of the Sustainable City (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi, I. & Berkman, L. (2000) Social cohesion, social capital and health, in: L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds) Social Epidemiology, pp. 174–190 (New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Livingston, M. & Leyland, A. (2014) ‘All in it together’? Social cohesion in a divided society: attitudes to income inequality and redistribution in a residential context, Journal of Social Policy, 43(3), pp. 453–477.10.1017/S0047279414000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.-F., Breadon, P., Davis, C., Hunter, A., Mares, P., Mullerworth, D. & Weidmann, B. (2012) Social Cities (Melbourne: Grattan Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. & Buys, L. (2010) Dimensions of Liveability: A Tool for Sustainable Cities [online]. Available at http://eprints.qut.edu.au/38526/1/38526.pdf (accessed 6 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C. & Nicholls, L. (2014) Encountering the multiplicity of community in planning and designing new neighbourhoods, Urban Policy and Research, 32(1), pp. 17–32.10.1080/08111146.2013.844120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea, R. & Walters, P. (2012) Impacts of urban consolidation on urban liveability: comparing an inner and outer suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Housing, Theory and Society, 29(2), pp. 190–206.10.1080/14036096.2011.641261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meares, C. & Owen, P. (2012) City Benchmarking: A Technical Report [online]. Available at www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/reports/technicalpublications/Documents/citybenchmarkingtechnicalreportfebruary2012.pdf (accessed 5 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Panelli, R. & Welch, R. (2005) Why community? Reading difference and singularity with community, Environment and Planning A, 37, pp. 1589–1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, B. (2003) The Work/Life Collision: What Work is Doing to Australians and What to Do About It (Annandale: The Federation Press).
   Google Scholar
• Queensland University of Technology (2009) High-density Liveability Guide [online]. Available at http://www.highdensityliveability.org.au/about110_high_density_study.php (accessed 15 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Riger, S. & Lavrakas, P. (1981) Community ties: patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods, American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), pp. 55–66.10.1007/BF00896360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, T., Cheshire, L. & Lawrence, G. (2009) Social interaction and sense of community in a master planned community, Housing, Theory and Society, 26(2), pp. 122–142.10.1080/14036090701862484
   Google Scholar
• Salvaris, M. (2012) Mike Salvaris Interview—Sydney Morning Herald [online]. Available at http://www.smh.com.au/national/full-transcript-mike-salvaris-20120802-23i25.html (Accessed 26 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2003) The neighborhood context of well being, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46, pp. 553–573.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, B. (1999) Divorce, kinship and the insecurities of contemporary family life, in: J. Vail, J. Wheelock & M. Hill (Eds) Insecure Times: Living with Insecurity in Contemporary Society, pp. 119–134 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1999) Sense of community and neighbourhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism, Urban Studies, 36(8), pp. 1361–1379.10.1080/0042098993033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmer, V. & Seymoar, N-K. (2006) The Livable City [online]. Vancouver: International Centre for Sustainable Cities. Available at http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/intergov_relations/library/wuf_the_livable_city.pdf (accessed 4 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000) Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobility for the Twenty-first Century (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Vine, D. (2012) The neglected dimension of community liveability: impact on social connectedness and active ageing in higher density accommodation. Doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Vinson, T. (2004) Community Adversity and Resilience: the Distribution of Social Disadvantage in Victoria and New South Wales and the Mediation Role of Social Services (Richmond: Jesuit Social Services).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, P. & Rosenblatt, T. (2008) Co-operation or co-presence? The comforting ideal of community in a master planned estate, Urban Policy and Research, 26(4), pp. 397–413.10.1080/08111140801986517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better (London: Allen Lane).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2005) Designing neighbourhoods for social interaction: the case of cohousing, Journal of Urban Design, 10(2), pp. 195–227.10.1080/13574800500086998
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, G. (2009) Measuring Up?: Assessing the Liveability of Australian Cities [Online]. Available at http://soac.fbe.unsw.edu.au/2009/PDF/Woolcock%20Geoffrey.pdf (accessed 26 March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. & Lawson, G. (2009) Meeting and greeting: activities in public outdoor spaces outside high-density urban residential communities, Urban Design International, 14(4), pp. 207–214.10.1057/udi.2009.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziller, A. (2004) The community is not a place and why it matters—case study: green square, Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), pp. 465–479.10.1080/0811114042000296353
   Google Scholar