Cost comparison of infrastructure on greenfield and infill sites

References

• ACIL Tasman, 2006. Land cost: the impact of land costs on housing affordability. 3rd ed. Melbourne: ACIL Tasman Pty. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., 1994. Urban planning and the development process. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adelaide Park Lands Authority, 2014. Proposal to develop Park Lands opposite Bowden, report to board meeting 28 August. Adelaide: Adelaide Park Lands Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Badcock, B., 1982. Removing the spatial bias from state housing provision in Australian cities. Political geography quarterly, 1 (2), 137–157.10.1016/0260-9827(82)90020-9
   Google Scholar
• Camacho, A., 2013. Community benefits agreements: a symptom not the antidote of bilateral land use regulation. Brooklyn law review, 78 (2), 355–383.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, S., 2005. Establishing standards for social infrastructure, UQ ‘Boilerhouse’ Community Engagement Centre. Ipswich: University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• City of Charles Sturt, 2013. Asset management plan for open space. Woodville, SA: City of Charles Sturt.
   Google Scholar
• City of Charles Sturt, 2014. Annual business plan and budget 2014/15. Woodville, SA: City of Charles Sturt.
   Google Scholar
• City of Playford, 2012. Playford alive 6 month update report, Report to Community and Environment Committee, 14 August. Elizabeth, SA: City of Playford.
   Google Scholar
• City of Playford, 2013. Playford alive 6 month report to Dec 2012, Report to City Strategy and Enterprises Committee, 12 March. Elizabeth, SA: City of Playford.
   Google Scholar
• Coiacetto, E., 2012. Understanding land development: a project-based approach. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, A., Horne, R., and Wakefield, R., 2007. Greening housing in Australia: a question of institutional capacity, European Network of Housing Researchers 2007 international conference ‘sustainable urban areas’. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, 2015. State of Australian cities 2014–2015. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J. and Sipe, N., 2008. Shocking the suburbs: urban location. Homeownership and oil vulnerability in the Australian city, housing studies, 23 (3), 377–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia, March 2015. Transforming our planning system: response of the South Australian government to the final report and recommendations of the expert panel on planning reform. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia, 2016. Planning, development and infrastructure act. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., Ruming, K., and Randolph, B., 2009. Counting the costs: planning requirements, infrastructure contributions, and residential development in Australia’. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, AHURI Final Report Number 140.
   Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J., 2016. Development viability. In: T. Crook, J. Henneberry, and C. Whitehead, eds. Planning gain: providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 115–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. and Kellett, J., 2015. The infrastructure costs of alternative urban development models, 7th state of Australian cities conference, 10–11 December. Gold Coast. Available from: http://apo.org.au/node/63337.
   Google Scholar
• InfraPlan, 2014. Urban infill versus greenfield development, Discussion Paper, dated Dec 2013. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Infrastructure Australia, 2010. State of Australian cities, Major Cities Unit. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kellett, J., Morrissey, J., and Karuppannan, S., 2012. The impact of location on housing affordability, 6th Australasian housing researchers’ conference, 8–10 February. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkin, K., 2013. Planning community infrastructure in a fast changing urban environment: measuring the social outcomes, 6th State of Australian cities conference, 26–29 November. Sydney. Available from: http://apo.org.au/node/59858.
   Google Scholar
• Kupke, V. and Rossini, P., 2011. Housing affordability in Australia for first home buyers on moderate incomes. Property management, 29 (4), 357–370.10.1108/02637471111154809
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T., 2013. Smart growth savings: what we know about public infrastructure and service cost savings and how they are misrepresented by critics. www.vtpi.org: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E., 2002. Hard and soft networks for urban competitiveness. Urban studies, 39 (5–6), 929–945.10.1080/00420980220128381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S., 2011. Greyfield residential precincts: a new design model for the regeneration of the middle suburbs, 5th state of Australian cities (SOAC) conference, 29 November. Melbourne. Available from: http://apo.org.au/node/60074.
   Google Scholar
• Neutze, M., 1995. Financing urban services. In: P. Troy, ed. Australian cities: issues, strategies and policies for urban Australia in the 1990s. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J., 1999. Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, R., ed., 2007. Valuation of real estate. Canberra: Australian Property Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Renewal SA, 2012. Annual report 2011–12. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Renewal SA, 2013. Annual report 2012–13. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Renewal SA, 2014. Delivering an inspiring urban future: annual report 2013–14. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Renewal SA, 2014. Urban design guidelines for Bowden urban village. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., 2010. Developer typologies in urban renewal in sydney: recognising the role of informal associations between developers and local government. Urban policy and research, 28 (1), 65–83.10.1080/08111140903356403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, G., 2004. The limits to urban consolidation. Australian planner, 41 (1), 42–48.10.1080/07293682.2004.9982332
   Google Scholar
• SGS Economics and Planning, 2003. Costs of urban form: discussion paper. Melbourne: SGS Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Trubka, R., Newman, P., and Bilsborough, D., 2010. The costs of urban sprawl—infrastructure and transportation. Environment design guide, Australian Institute of Architects, GEN 83, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanalyst, 2011. SA planning minister promises planning overhaul, 740. www.urbanalyst.com: Urbanalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Development Institute of Australia, 2013. The 2013 UDIA state of the land report, national land supply study. Canberra: UDIA National, 17pp.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Renewal Authority, 2013. Audit of financial report. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Urbis, 2011. National dwelling cost study, prepared for National Housing Supply Council. Sydney, 56pp.
   Google Scholar
• Whitzman, C., 2011. Welcome speech, 5th State of Australian Cities national conference, 29 November. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. and Reed, R., 2008. Property development. 5th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar