1,112
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Production and Politics of Urban Knowledge: Contesting Transport in Auckland, New Zealand

ORCID Icon
Pages 45-61 | Received 17 Jul 2017, Accepted 21 Apr 2018, Published online: 26 Jun 2018

References

  • Bean, C., Kearns, R., and Collins, D., 2008. Exploring social mobilities: narratives of walking and driving in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Studies, 45 (13), 2829–2848.
  • Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., and Te Brommelstroet, M., 2012. Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation research part a: policy and practice, 46 (1), 68–78.
  • Bocking, S., 2006. Constructing urban expertise: professional and political authority in Toronto, 1940–1970. Journal of Urban History, 33 (1), 51–76.
  • Börjesson, M., Brundell-Freij, K., and Eliasson, J., 2014. Not invented here: transferability of congestion charges effects. Transport policy, 36, 263–271.
  • Bush, G., 2014. From survival to revival: Auckland’s public transport since 1860. Wellington, New Zealand: Grantham House Publishing.
  • Campaign for Better Transport, 2017. About us. Available from: http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/about-us/ [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Castells, M., 2008. The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 78–93.
  • Chapman, R., et al., 2017. Towards zero carbon? Constrained policy action in two New Zealand cities. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24 (2), 97–116.
  • Cohen, D., 2017. The myth of municipal political will: the politics of collective consumption and the failure of Michael Bloomberg’s congestion charge. Paper presented at American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Contradictions of the Climate Friendly City 1: critical Perspectives on Urban Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Boston, MA.
  • Dahlgren, P., 2005. The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22 (2), 147–162.
  • Generation Zero (2017). Home page. Available from: http://www.generationzero.org [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Greater Auckland (2015). Photo of the day - O’Connell Before and After. Available from: https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2015/02/19/photo-of-the-day-oconnell-before-and-after/ [Accessed 18 December 2017].
  • Greater Auckland (2017). Our Vision. Available from: https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/our-vision/ [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Harris, C., 2005. Slow train coming: the New Zealand state changes its mind about Auckland transit, 1949–56. Urban Policy and Research, 23 (1), 37–55.
  • Healey, P. and Hillier, J., 1996. Communicative micropolitics: A story of claims and discourses. International Planning Studies, 1 (2), 165–184.
  • Hickman, R., 2014. Urban dispersal and high motorisation (Auckland). In: R. Hickman and D. Banister, eds. Transport, climate change and the city, chapter 7. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Hodson, M., et al., 2012. Reshaping urban infrastructure: material flow analysis and transitions analysis in an urban context. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16 (6), 789–800.
  • Imran, M. and Pearce, J., 2015. Discursive barriers to sustainable transport in New Zealand cities. Urban Policy and Research, 33 (4), 392–415.
  • Kębłowski, W. and Bassens, D., 2018. “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: the uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography., 39 (3), 413–437.
  • Kirby, A., 2013. Cities and powerful knowledge: an editorial essay on accepted wisdom and global urban theory [Part I]. Cities, 32 (1), S3–S9.
  • Labour (2017). 2017 Election Policy - Transport. Available from: http://www.labour.org.nz/transport [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Legacy, C., 2016. Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Studies, 53 (14), 3108–3124.
  • Mackie, P. and Preston, J., 1998. Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transport Policy, 5 (1), 1–7.
  • Marsden, G., Frick, K., and May, A.D., 2012. Bounded rationality in policy learning amongst cities: lessons from the transport sector. Environment and Planning A, 44 (4), 905–920.
  • Mayer, M., 2013. Multiscalar mobilization for the just city: new spatial politics of urban movements. In: W. Nicholls, B. Miller, and J. Beaumont, editors. Spaces of Contention. Farnham, United Kingdom: Ashgate, pages 163–196.
  • McArthur, J., 2017. Auckland: rescaled governance and post-suburban politics. Cities, 64, 79–87.
  • McCann, E., 2011. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101 (1), 107–130.
  • McFarlane, C. and Rutherford, J., 2008. Political infrastructures: governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32 (2), 363–374.
  • Mees, P. and Dodson, J., 2007. Backtracking Auckland?: technical and Communicative reason in metropolitan transport planning. International planning studies, 12 (1), 35–53.
  • Ministry of Transport (2014). Historic New Zealand light vehicle traffic forecasts vs actual growth. Available from: http://www.transport.govt.nz/ourwork/keystrategiesandplans/strategic-policy-programme/future-demand/ [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Mould, O., 2014. Tactical urbanism: the new vernacular of the creative city. Geography Compass, 8 (8), 529–539.
  • Næss, P. and Strand, A., 2012. What kinds of traffic forecasts are possible? Journal of Critical Realism, 11 (3), 277–295.
  • Pang, N. and Goh, D., 2016. Can blogs function as rhetorical publics in Asian democracies? An analysis using the case of Singapore. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 504–513.
  • Papacharissi, Z., 2002. The Virtual Sphere: the Internet as a Public Sphere. New Media & Society, 4 (1), 9–36.
  • Peck, J., 2011. Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35 (6), 773–797.
  • Samuelson, P., 1948. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15 (60), 243–253.
  • The Spinoff. (2017). About the Spinoff’s War for Auckland. Available from: https://www.pledgeme.co.nz/projects/4738-the-spinoff-s-war-for-auckland [Accessed 17 December 2017].
  • Stehlin, J. and Tarr, A., 2017. Think regionally, act locally?: gardening, cycling, and the horizon of urban spatial politics. Urban Geography, 38 (9), 1329–1351.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2010. Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition. In: M. Cerreta, G. Concilio, and V. Monno, eds. Making strategies in spatial planning, volume 9 of urban and landscape perspectives, chapter 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 185–205.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2017. Unlocking the mind-trap: politicising urban theory and practice. Urban Studies, 54 (1), 55–61.
  • Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., and Wellman, B., 2012. Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks, 34 (1), 73–81.
  • Trapenberg Frick, K., 2016. Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era. Planning Theory & Practice, 17 (1), 93–118.
  • Van Damme, S. (2013). Is it possible to write a history of urban knowledge? Metropolitics. Available from: http://www.metropolitiques.eu/Is-it-possible-to-write-a-history.html [Accessed 5 August 2017].
  • Vigar, G., 2017. The four knowledges of transport planning: enacting a more communicative, transdisciplinary policy and decision-making. Transport Policy, 58, 39–45.
  • Williamson, W. and Ruming, K., 2017. Urban consolidation process and discourses in Sydney: unpacking social media use in a community group’s media campaign. Planning Theory & Practice, 18 (3), 428–445.
  • Wood, A., 2015. Multiple temporalities of policy circulation: gradual, repetitive and delayed processes of BRT adoption in South African Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39 (3), 568–580.
  • Zizek, S., 1999. The Ticklish Subject. The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London, United Kingdom: Verso.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.