Small Lot Housing as a Means to Realise Compact Cities: The Case of Perth, Western Australia

References

• ABS, 2015. Population pyramid Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/home/population%20pyramid%20%20australia
   Google Scholar
• ABS, 2016. 2011 census QuickStats: greater Perth. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/5GPER?opendocument&navpos=220
   Google Scholar
• Profile.id. (2014). Population growth in Western Australia. .id - The Population Experts. Available from: https://blog.id.com.au/2014/population/population-trends/population-growth-in-western-australia/ [ Accessed 20 Jan 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Baar, K.K., 1996. The anti-apartment movement in the US and the role of land use regulations in creating housing segregation. Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment, 11 (4), 359–379.
   Google Scholar
• Barreira, A.P., et al., 2017. Exploring residential satisfaction in shrinking cities: a decision-tree approach. Urban research & practice, 10 (2), 156–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, M. and Tieman, G., 2005. Patterns of urban consolidation in Melbourne: planning policy and the growth of medium density housing. Urban Policy and Research, 23 (2), 137–157.
   Google Scholar
• Buys, L. and Miller, E., 2012. Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55 (3), 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, N., 2017. Micro lots offer buyers in Perth an affordable alternative. Realestate.com.au. Available from: https://www.realestate.com.au/news/micro-lots-offer-buyers-in-perth-affordable-alternative/
   Google Scholar
• DoP, 2017. MRS maps. Available from: https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/687.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W.A., 2004. An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41 (2), 317–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, R., 1998. The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: revisiting the 1916 New York city ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64 (2), 170–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, C., 2006. The challenge of change: Australian cities and urban planning in the new millennium. Geographical Research, 44 (2), 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E.L. and Gyourko, J., 2003. The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9 (2), 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Grose, M.J., 2007. Perth’s Stephenson‐Hepburn Plan of 1955: 10% POS, and housing then and now. Australian Planner, 44 (4), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A.C., 2007. Where have all the gardens gone?: an investigation into the disappearance of Back Yards in the Newer Australian Suburb. Urban Research Program, Griffith University, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Harth, M., 2000. Housing alternatives in the single family neighbourhood. Vancouver: Master of Landscape Architecture - MLA University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, S., 2012. Mixed use by default: how the Europeans (don’t) zone. Journal of Planning Literature, 27 (4), 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S., 2013. Home, sweet home: American residential zoning in comparative perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33 (3), 292–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R. 2013. Smart ways to manage densities. Available from: http://blog.udiawa.com.au/article/smart-ways-to-manage-densities
   Google Scholar
• Ihlanfeldt, K.R., 2004. Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: a review of the evidence and policy prescriptions. Urban Studies, 41 (2), 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda, S. and Washington, E., 2015. How land-use regulation undermines affordable housing. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Research, Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J.F., Weidmann, B., and Walsh, M., 2011. The housing we’d choose. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kerstens, J. and Pojani, D., 2018. Urban living preferences of youth international migrants: an investigation of Asian students in Australia. Australian Planner, 55 (1), 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. and Carville, A., 2017. To follow the Australian dream or to embrace urban densification: a prolonged debate?. In: J.H.P. Bay and S. Lehmann, eds.. Growing compact: urban form, density and sustainability. London: Routledge, 301.
   Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K., 2015. Towards topographically sensitive urbanism: re-envisioning earthwork terracing in suburban development. Journal of Urbanism: International research on placemaking and urban sustainability, 8 (4), 331–351.
   Google Scholar
• Luscombe, S.D. 2015. Redevelopment on the periphery: an examination of the changing status of Armadale within successive strategic plans for Perth and corresponding revisions to local planning schemes. ( PhD). (Urban and Regional Planning) Curtin University, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, M., 2016. Small lot housing: is design or policy more effective in the pursuit of urban consolidation? Perth: Master of Urban and Regional Planning Curtin University.
   Google Scholar
• Margo, R.A., 1992. Explaining the postwar suburbanization of population in the United States: the role of income. Journal of Urban Economics, 31 (3), 301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea, R. and Walters, P., 2012. Impacts of urban consolidation on urban liveability: comparing an inner and outer suburb in Brisbane, Australia. Housing, Theory and Society, 29 (2), 190–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, P., 2009. How dense are we?: another look at urban density and transport patterns in Australia, Canada and the USA. Road & transport research: a journal of Australian and New Zealand research and practice, 18 (4), 58.
   Google Scholar
• Nematollahi, S., Tiwari, R., and Hedgecock, D., 2016. Desirable dense neighbourhoods: an environmental psychological approach for understanding community resistance to densification. Urban Policy and Research, 34 (2), 132–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P. and Glackin, S., 2014. Understanding infill: towards new policy and practice for urban regeneration in the established suburbs of Australia’s cities. Urban Policy and Research, 32 (2), 121–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PerhNow, 2013. Average Perth block size shrinks again. Sunday Times. Available from: http://www.perthnow.com.au/realestate/news/average-perth-block-size-shrinks-again/news-story/b7fe27f156f3937551cc711ef314a91d
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R.H., 2004. Land use and society, revised edition: geography, law, and public policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, B. and Tice, A., 2013. Who lives in higher density housing? A study of spatially discontinuous housing sub-markets in Sydney and Melbourne. Urban Studies, 50 (13), 2661–2681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, S. and Phibbs, P., 2012. Delivering diverse and affordable housing on infill development sites. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., Houston, D., and Amati, M., 2012. Multiple suburban publics: rethinking community opposition to consolidation in Sydney. Geographical Research, 50 (4), 421–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K.J., 2014. Urban consolidation, strategic planning and community opposition in Sydney, Australia: unpacking policy knowledge and public perceptions. Land Use Policy, 39, 254–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, G., 2004. The limits to urban consolidation. Australian Planner, 41 (1), 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, G., 2010. Too concentrated? The planned distribution of residential density in SEQ. Australian Planner, 47 (3), 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, G. and Filion, P., 2010. Planning context and urban intensification outcomes: Sydney versus Toronto. Urban Studies, 48 (7), 1419–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, J., Gray, M., and Phillips, B., 2017. Attitudes to housing affordability: pressures, problems and solutions. Canberra: Australian National University. Available from: http://politicsir.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/ANUpoll-24-Housing-2017_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T., 1981. The analysis of burgage patterns in medieval towns. Area, 13 (3), 211–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoWA, 2013. The housing we’d choose: a study for Perth and peel. Perth: Department of Housing and Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., 2012. City rules: how regulations affect urban form. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• UDIA, 2016. 2016 UDIA state of the land - national land supply study. Perth: Urban Development Institute of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• WAPC, 2015. Perth and Peel at 3.5 Million (Draft) - Strategic Land Use Plan. Perth: Western Australian Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• WAPC, 2016. State planning policy 7 (draft). Perth: Western Australian Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Willing, R. and Pojani, D., 2017. Is the suburban dream still alive in Australia? Evidence from Brisbane. Australian Planner, 54 (2), 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, I., Dovey, K., and Davison, G., 2012. Envisioning the compact city: resident responses to urban design imagery. Australian Planner, 49 (1), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X., 2005. ‘The great Australian dream’busted on a brick wall: housing issues in Sydney. Cities, 22 (6), 436–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabel, J. and Dalton, M., 2011. The impact of minimum lot size regulations on house prices in Eastern Massachusetts. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41 (6), 571–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar