Urban Food Infrastructures: The Role of Inner-City Universities

References

• Acker, S.R., and Miller, M.D., 2005. Campus learning spaces: investing in how students learn. Colorado: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Charles, D., and Madanipour, A., 2010. Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European planning studies, 18 (10), 1611–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and Muniesa, F., 2020. Introduction: assetization and technoscientific capitalism, 1. Massachusetts: MIT Press. 9780262359030. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., 1999. University students and city centres – the formation of exclusive geographies: The case of Bristol, UK. Geoforum, 30 (2), 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collie, C., and Gleeson, B., 2018. Melbourne’s ‘doughnut city’ housed its homeless, The Conversation Media Group ltd., viewed 25th May 2019. https://theconversation.com/melbournes-doughnut-city-housed-its-homeless-93062.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, H., 2018. The multi-million dollar arms race to lure students to university, Fairfax Publishing, viewed 15th December 2018. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-multi-million-dollar-arms-race-to-lure-students-to-university-20180601-p4zivl.html.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, W., and Hague, E., 2008. A special brand of sausage. Antipode, 40 (5), 724–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, G., 2009. Carlton and the campus: The University and the gentrification of inner Melbourne 1958–75. Urban Policy and research, 27 (3), 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duster, T., and Waters, A., 2006. Engaged Learning across the Curriculum: The Vertical Integration of Food for Thought, Association of American Colleges and Universities, viewed 24th May 2014. http://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/le-sp06/le-sp06_perspective.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlenz, M., Birch, E.L., and Agness, B., 2014. The power of eds and meds: urban universities investing in neighborhood revitalization and innovation districts. Philadelphia: Penn Institute for Urban Research: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D., 2018. ‘What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?’, The Sociological Review, viewed 20th August 2018. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/128406/.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., and Shaw, K., 2009. The unintended segregation of transnational students in central Melbourne. Environment and planning A, 41 (8), 1884–1902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U., 2014. An Introduction to qualitative research. London, U.K: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., and Dupuis, E.M., 2002. Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production–consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia ruralis, 42 (1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, D., DuPuis, E.M., and Goodman, M.K., 2012. Alternative food networks: knowledge, practice, and politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, H., 2017. How student centres can help create ‘sticky campuses’, SNC-Lavalin’s Atkins business, viewed 26 February 2018. http://www.atkinsglobal.com/en-gb/angles/all-angles/how-student-centres-can-help-create-sticky-campuses.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., Marvin, S., and Moss, T., 2001. Urban infrastructure in transition: networks, buildings, plans. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Komisar, J., and Nasr, J., 2019. Urban design for food systems. URBAN DESIGN international, 24, 77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lachman, A.B., and Sayers, K., 1974. Student Catering: A report by the Public Interest Research Group, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A., 2016. The sticky wars: battling to keep students on campus, Foreground, viewed 26th February 2018. https://www.foreground.com.au/public-domain/the-sticky-wars-battling-to-keep-students-on-campus/.
   Google Scholar
• McShane, I., 1995. ‘"Balanced development”: a study of the Murray Committee on Australian Universities’, Masters thesis, University of Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Middha, B., 2018. Everyday digital engagements: using food selfies on Facebook to explore eating practices. Communication research and practice, 4 (3), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middha, B., 2020. Spaces of capability: consumption geographies at an inner-city university. Geographical research, special issue: new consumption geographies, 58 (3), 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Middha, B., et al., 2021a. Spatio-temporalities of convenience eating for sustainability outcomes at an inner-urban university. Geographical research, 59, 407–423. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middha, B., and Lewis, T., 2021b. Pop-up food provisioning as a sustainable third space: reshaping eating practices at an inner urban university. Australian geographer, 52 (4), 407–424.
   Google Scholar
• Milyaeva, S., and Neyland, D., 2020. English Higher Education: From a Public Good to a Public Asset, 10, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, 9780262359030. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., et al., 2010. Intermediaries and the reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructures: An introduction. In: S Guy, S Marvin, W Medd, and T Moss, eds. Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Murray-Smith, S., and Dare, A.J., 1987. The tech: A centenary history of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Melbourne: Hyland House.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., 2009. Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In: S Ybema, D Yanow, H Wels, and FH Kamsteeg, eds. Organizational ethnography: studying the complexities of everyday life. London: Sage Publications, 120–138.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., 2012. Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, K., 1998. Understanding metropolitan Melbourne … without being confused by coffee and doughnuts. Urban Policy and research, 16 (2), 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Parham, S., 2013. Market place: food quarters, design and urban renewal in London. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D.C., and Wiewel, W., 2005. The university as urban developer: case studies and analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D.C., and Wiewel, W., 2008. Context and introduction. In: DC Perry, and W Wiewel, eds. Global universities and urban development: case studies and analysis. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pothukuchi, K., and Molnar, S.A., 2015. Sustainable food systems at urban Public universities: a survey of U-21 universities. Journal of urban affairs, 37 (3), 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A., 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of social theory, 5 (2), 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., 2005. Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization studies, 26 (3), 465–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., 2010. The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., 2015. Practices, Governance and sustainability. In: Y Strengers, and C Maller, eds. Social practices, intervention and sustainability: Beyond behaviour change. Abingdon: Routledge – Earthscan, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and Yanow, D., 2013. Interpretive research design: concepts and processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, R., 1991. Places on the margin. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., 2016. ‘Steering by accident: unintended governance strategies in action’, paper presented to Proceedings of the DEMAND Centre International Conference, Lancaster university, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and Pantzar, M., 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of nordic walking. Journal of consumer culture, 5 (1), 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., and Watson, M., 2012. The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G., Lamers, M., and Weenink, D., 2017. ‘Introduction’. In: G. Spaargaren, M. Lamers, and D. Weenink, eds. Practice theory and research: exploring the dynamics of social life. Abingdon, OX: Routledge, 6–33.
   Google Scholar
• Spurling, N., et al., 2013. Interventions in practice: re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour. U.K: Sustainable practices Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, M., and Jonas, M., 2015. ‘Debating spatial dimensions of practice(s)’, Traverses, viewed 13th May 2016. http://www.espacestemps.net/articles/debating-spatial-dimensions-of-practices/.
   Google Scholar
• TEMC., 2014. ‘Sticky Campus - Re-Inventing Retail for the 24/7 Campus’, paper presented to Tertiary Education Management Conference, Cairns.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wusten, H., 1998. A warehouse of precious goods: The university in its urban context. In: H van der Wusten, ed. The urban university and its identity, roots, location, roles. Amsterdam: Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht, Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, D., and Warde, A., 2017. How should we understand ‘general understandings’? In: A Hui, T Schatzki, and E Shove, eds. The nexus of practices: connections, constellations, practitioners. Oxon: Routledge, 183–196.
   Google Scholar