References
- Ahiablame, L., Engel, B., and Chaubey, I., 2012. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. An international journal of environmental pollution, 223 (7), 4253–4273. doi:10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.
- Anguelovski, I., et al., 2018. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban geography, 39 (3), 458–491. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987.
- Ardern, J. 2020. Speech to Labour Party Congress 2020 [online]. Available from: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/speech-labour-party-congress-2020 [Accessed 10 October 2020].
- Ashley, R., et al., 2011. Surface water management and urban green infrastructure. A review of potential benefits and UK and international practices. Bucks: Foundation for Water Research.
- Auckland Council. 2018. Auckland Plan 2050. Available from: https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/auckland-plan/Pages/default.aspx.
- Auckland Council. 2020. A living connection between land and sea [online]. Available from: https://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/articles/news/2020/07/a-living-connection-between-land-and-sea/ [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- Barton, H., and Grant, M., 2013. Urban planning for healthy cities: a review of the progress of the European healthy cities programme. Journal of urban health, 90 (SS1), 129–141. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3.
- Benedict, M., et al., 2006. Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Washington: Island Press.
- Benedict, M., and McMahon, E., 2002. Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable resources journal, 20, 12–17.
- Bogler, A., et al., 2020. Rethinking wastewater risks and monitoring in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature sustainability, 3 (12), 981–990. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00605-2.
- Broughton, D., and McBreen, K., 2015. Mātauranga Māori, tino rangatiratanga and the future of New Zealand science. Journal of the royal society of New Zealand, 45 (2), 83–88. doi:10.1080/03036758.2015.1011171.
- Buizer, M., Elands, B., and Vierikko, K., 2016. Governing cities reflexively – the biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services. Environmental science & policy, 62, 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003.
- Cameron, R., et al., 2012. The domestic garden – its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban forestry and urban greening, 11 (2), 129–137. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002.
- Climate Change Commission. 2020. Letter dated 7 April 2020 to Hon. James Shaw, Minister for Climate Change from Dr Rod Carr, Chair – Climate Change Commission.
- Crown Infrastructure Partners. 2020. ‘Shovel Ready’ infrastructure projects: project information guidelines [online]. Available from: https://www.crowninfrastructure.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/Shovel-Ready-Project-Information-Guidelines.pdf.
- Demuzere, M., et al., 2014. Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of environmental management, 146, 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025.
- Di Giulio, G., et al., 2019. Bridging the gap between will and action on climate change adaptation in large cities in Brazil. Regional environmental change, doi:10.1007/s10113-019-01570-z.
- Fenner, R., 2017. Spatial evaluation of multiple benefits to encourage multi-functional design of sustainable drainage in blue-green cities. Water, 9 (12), 953. doi:10.3390/w9120953.
- Figueres, C. 2020. COVID-19 has given us the chance to build a low-carbon future [online]. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/01/covid-low-carbon-future-lockdown-pandemic-green-economy [Accessed 29 January 2021].
- Finewood, M., 2016. Green infrastructure, grey epistemologies, and the urban political ecology of Pittsburgh's water governance. Antipode, 48 (4), 1000–1021.
- Fisher, D., Blackstock, K., and Irvine, K., 2020. It's on the ‘nice to have’ pile": potential principles to improve the implementation of socially inclusive green infrastructure. AMBIO. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01372-2.
- Fletcher, T.D., et al., 2015. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban water journal, 12 (7), 525–542. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314.
- Flick, U., 2014. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE.
- Fonseka, D. 2020. No post-Covid green ‘nirvana’. Newsroom. Available from: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2020/05/25/1201982/no-post-covid-green-nirvana [Accessed 10 January 2021].
- Future Proof, 2020a. Hamilton-Waikato metropolitan spatial plan. Hamilton: Future Proof. Available from: https://futureproof.org.nz/assets/FutureProof/H2A/Metro-Spatial-Plan/Hamilton-Waikato-Metropolitan-Spatial-Plan-Final-Low-Res.pdf.
- Future Proof. 2020b. Shovel ready projects proposal. Available from: https://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-city/covid-19/recovery-package/Documents/Executive%20Summary%20for%20Futureproof%20area%20(1).pdf.
- Gibson, E., Wannan, O., and Mitchell, C. 2020. The publicly-funded climate resilience projects that might actually make the problem worse. Stuff. Available from: https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/123035715/the-publiclyfunded-climate-resilience-projects-that-might-actually-make-the-problem-worse [Accessed 10 January 2021].
- Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al., 2013. Urban ecosystem services. In: T. Elmqvist, M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P. J. Marcotullio, R. I. McDonald, and C. Wilkinson, eds. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Dordrecht: Springer, 175–251.
- Grădinaru, S., and Hersperger, A., 2019. Green infrastructure in strategic spatial plans: evidence from European urban regions. Urban forestry & urban greening, 40, 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.018.
- Haase, D., Frantzeskaki, N., and Elmqvist, T., 2014. Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: practical applications and governance implications. AMBIO, 43 (4), 407–412. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1.
- Hamilton City Council. 2020. Hamilton Mode Shift Programme - 20 Minute City [online]. Available from: https://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-city/covid-19/recovery-package/Documents/1.%20Hamilton%20Mode%20Shift%20Programme%20-%2020%20Minute%20City%20.pdf.
- Hanzl, M., 2020. Urban forms and green infrastructure – the implications for public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities & health, 5(sup1), S232–S23610.1080/23748834.2020.1791441.
- Harmsworth, G., and Awatere, S., 2013. Indigenous Māori knowledge and perspectives of ecosystems. In: J. R Dymond, ed. Ecosystem services in New Zealand – conditions and trends. Lincoln: Manaaki Whenua Press, 274–286.
- Harmsworth, G., Awatere, S., and Robb, M., 2016. Indigenous Māori values and perspectives to inform freshwater management in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Ecology and society, 21 (4), Article 9. doi:10.5751/ES-08804-210409.
- Hepburn, C., et al., 2020. Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Oxford review of economic policy, 36 (1), S359–S381. doi:10.1093/oxrep/graa015.
- Hislop, M., Scott, A., and Corbett, A., 2019. What does good green infrastructure planning policy look like? Developing and testing a policy assessment tool within central Scotland UK. Planning theory practice, 20 (5), 633–655. doi:10.1080/14649357.2019.1678667.
- Hobbs, J.E., 2020. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian journal of agricultural economics, 68 (2), 171–176. doi:10.1111/cjag.12237.
- Immergluck, D., and Balan, T., 2018. Sustainable for whom? Green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the Atlanta Beltline. Urban geography, 39 (4), 546–562. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041.
- Ipsos MORI. 2020. Earth Day 2020. How do Great Britain and the world view climate change and Covid-19? Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/two-thirds-britons-believe-climate-change-serious-coronavirus-and-majority-want-climate-prioritised [Accessed 10 January 2021].
- Jenkins, A., 2020. Biotic systems as a critical urban infrastructure during crisis: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities & health, 5, S152–S154. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1789821.
- Kabisch, N., et al., 2016. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and society, 21 (2), Article 39. doi:10.5751/ES-08373-210239.
- Keane, M., and Neal, T., 2021. Consumer panic in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of econometrics, 220 (1), 86–105. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.045.
- Lafortezza, R., et al., 2013. Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions. iForest - biogeosciences and forestry, 6 (3), 102–108. doi:10.3832/ifor0723-006.
- Landscape Architecture Aotearoa. 2019. Making space for human and coastal ecologies. Available from: https://www.landscapearchitecture.nz/landscape-architecture-aotearoa/2019/10/16/wv03u0c1p1e9xocnddub0pqmylycoc [Accessed 7 December 2020].
- Lawson, E., et al., 2014. Delivering and evaluating the multiple flood risk benefits in blue-green cities: An interdisciplinary approach. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment, 184, 113–124. doi:10.2495/FRIAR140101.
- Lawyers for Climate Action NZ. 2020. Press release: Government has legal obligation to consider climate impact of spending [online]. Available from: https://www.lawyersforclimateaction.nz/news-events/press-release-government-has-legal-obligation-to-consider-climate-impact-of-spending [Accessed 10 February 2021].
- Lemes de Oliveira, F., 2019. Towards a spatial planning framework for the re-naturing of cities. In: F. Lemes de Oliveira, and I. Mell. Planning cities with nature. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 81–95.
- Lemes de Oliveira, F., and Mell, I., 2019. Planning cities with nature. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Lennon, M., 2020. Green space and the compact city: planning issues for a ‘new normal’. Cities & health, 1–4. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1778843.
- Lin, B., Meyers, J., and Barnett, G., 2019. Establishing priorities for urban green infrastructure research in Australia. Urban policy and research, 37 (1), 30–44. doi:10.1080/08111146.2018.1523054.
- Local Government Act. 2002. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0084/167.0/DLM170873.html.
- Makey, L., and Awatere, S., 2018. He Mahere Pāhekoheko Mō Kaipara Moana-integrated ecosystem-based management for Kaipara Harbour, Aotearoa New Zealand. Society & natural resources, 31 (12), 1400–1418. doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1484972.
- Marot, N., Golobic, M., and Meuller, B., 2015. Green infrastructure in central, eastern, and south-Eastern Europe: Is there a universal solution to environmental and spatial challenges? Urbani Izziv, 26, S1–S12. doi:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2015-26-supplement-000.
- Matthews, T., Lo, A., and Byrne, J., 2015. Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landscape and urban planning, 138 (C), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010.
- McAllister, T., et al., 2019. Kua takoto te mānuka: Mātauranga Māori in New Zealand ecology. New Zealand journal of ecology, 43, 3. doi:10.20417/nzjecol.43.41.
- McCunn, L., 2020. The importance of nature to city living during the COVID-19 pandemic: considerations and goals from environmental psychology. Cities & health, 1–4. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1795385.
- McMillen, H., et al., 2020. Biocultural stewardship, indigenous and local ecological knowledge, and the urban crucible. Ecology and society, 25 (2), Article 9, doi:10.5751/ES-11386-250209.
- Meerow, S., and Newell, J.P., 2017. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and urban planning, 159 (C), 62–75. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005.
- Mell, I., 2021. But who’s going to pay for it?’ Contemporary approaches to green infrastructure financing, development and governance in London. UK. journal of environmental policy & planning, 23 (5), 628–645. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2021.1931064.
- Ministry for the Environment. 2019. National planning standards. Available from: https://environment.govt.nz/acts-and-regulations/national-planning-standards/.
- Morton, J. 2020. Seven in 10 Kiwis want a green Covid-19 recovery – survey [online]. New Zealand Herald. Available from: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id = 3&objectid = 12353555 [Accessed 10 December 2021].
- Nascimento, N., et al., 2019. Sustainable urban development through a blue and green network approach focusing the protection of water resources: the case of the Belo Horizonte metropolitan region, in Brazil. International journal of water, 13 (4), 311–332. doi:10.1504/ijw.2019.106045.
- Neuwelt-Kearns, C., 2020. Aotearoa, land of the long wide bare cupboard part 6: food insecurity in New Zealand [online]. New Zealand: Child Poverty Action Group. Available from: https://www.cpag.org.nz/assets/12062020%20CPAG%20Food%20Insecurity%20VI%20-%20FINAL.pdf.
- Norton, B., et al., 2015. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 134, 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018.
- Oberndorfer, E., et al., 2007. Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. Bioscience, 57 (10), 823–833. doi:10.1641/B571005.
- O’Callaghan, B., and Murdock, E., 2021. Are we building back better? evidence from 2020 and pathways to inclusive green recovery spending. United Nations Environment Programme. Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/are-we-building-back-better-evidence-2020-and-pathways-inclusive-green.
- OECD. 2020. Building Back better: a sustainable, resilient recovery after Covid-19. Available from: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref = 133_133639-s08q2ridhf&title = Building-back-better-_A-sustainable-resilient-recovery-after-Covid-19.
- O'Sullivan, F., Mell, I., and Clement, S., 2020. Novel solutions or rebranded approaches: evaluating the use of nature-based solutions (NBS) in Europe. Frontiers in sustainable cities, 2, doi:10.3389/frsc.2020.572527.
- Pauleit, S., et al., 2017. Nature-based solutions and climate change—four shades of green. In: N. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, and A Bonn, eds. Nature-Based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 29–49.
- Regenerate Christchurch. 2019. Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor Regeneration Plan [online]. Available from: https://dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2019-08/Otakaro%20Avon%20River%20Corridor%20Regeneration%20PlanReducedSize.pdf.
- Resource Management Review Panel, 2020. New directions for resource management in New Zealand. Report of the resource management review panel June 2020. Wellington: Ministry for The Environment.
- Rice, L., 2020. After COVID-19: urban design as spatial medicine. URBAN DESIGN international, doi:10.1057/s41289-020-00142-6.
- Robertson, G. 2020. Finance Minister's Budget 2020 speech [online]. Available from: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/finance-ministers-budget-2020-speech.
- Roy, A., et al., 2008. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental management, 42 (2), 344–359. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1.
- Samuelsson, K., et al., 2020. Urban nature as a source of resilience during social distancing amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Landscape and urban planning, Preprint. doi:10.31219/osf.io/3wx5a.
- Soz, S., Kryspin-Watson, J., and Stanton-Geddes, Z., 2016. The role of green infrastructure solutions in urban flood risk management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Strand, J., and Toman, M., 2010. Green stimulus, economic recovery, and long-term sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Svendsen, E., Campbell, L., and McMillen, H., 2016. Stories, shrines, and symbols: recognizing psycho-social-spiritual benefits of urban parks and natural areas. Journal of ethnobiology, 36 (4), 881–907.
- Thorne, C., et al., 2018. Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of blue-green infrastructure for urban flood risk management. Flood risk management, 11 (S2), S960–S972. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12218.
- Tzoulas, K., et al., 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and urban planning, 81 (3), 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
- United Nations. 2020. Policy brief: COVID-19 in an urban world. Available from: https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-covid-19-urban-world.
- Wallace, P., and Holman, J., 2019. The state of well-being – a search for meaning in the New Zealand regulatory environment. New Zealand journal of environmental Law, 23, 1–30. Available from: https://rmla.org.nz/2021/05/11/new-zealand-journal-of-environment-law-issue-23-2019/.
- Willems, J.J., et al., 2021. How actors are (dis)integrating policy agendas for multi-functional blue and green infrastructure projects on the ground. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 23 (1), 84–96. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1798750.
- Wolch, J., Byrne, J., and Newell, J., 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning, 125 (C), 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.
- Wray, A., Fleming, J., and Gilliland, J., 2020. The public realm during public health emergencies: exploring local level responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities & health, 1–4. doi:10.1080/23748834.2020.1790260.
- Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research: design and methods . 3rd ed. California: SAGE.