Three conductivity modelling algorithms and three 3D inversions of the Forrestania test site AEM anomaly

References

• Boesen, T.J., E. Auken, A.V. Christiansen, G. Fiandaca, and C. Schamper. 2018. A parallel computing thin sheets inversion algorithm for airborne time domain data utilizing a variable overburden. Geophysical Prospecting, doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R.C., and M. Costelloe. 2011. Kombolgie VTEM™ AEM Survey: Inversion Report: Geoscience Australia internal report GeoCat 72582.
   Google Scholar
• Constable, S., A. Orange, and K. Key. 2015. And the geophysicist replied: “Which model do you want?” Geophysics 80, no. 3: E197–E212. doi:10.1190/geo2014-0381.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L.H., G.A. Wilson, and M.S. Zhdanov. 2010. 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint. Exploration Geophysics 41, no. 4: 250–259. doi: 10.1071/EG10003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L.H., G.A. Wilson, and M.S. Zhdanov. 2012. 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data. Geophysics 77, no. 4), WB59–WB69. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0370.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, G.D., and A. Kelbert. 2012. Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophysical Journal International 189: 251–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMIT. 2014. Maxwell modeling, presentation and visualization of EM and electrical geophysical data. http://www.electromag.com.au/maxwell.php (accessed February 12, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Farquharson, C.G. 2008. Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions. Geophysics 73: K1–K9. doi: 10.1190/1.2816650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemoteau, J., P. Sailhac, and M. Béhaegel. 2011. Regularization strategy for the layered inversion of airborne transient electromagnetic data: Application to in-loop data acquired over the basin of Franceville (Gabon). Geophysical Prospecting 59: 1132–1143. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemoteau, J., P. Sailhac, and M. Béhaegel. 2012. Fast approximate 2D inversion of airborne TEM data: Born approximation and empirical approach. Geophysics 77, no. 4: WB89–WB97. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0372.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, L., and J. Macnae. 2010. Inversion of concentric loop electromagnetic data by transformation to an equivalent potential field response. Exploration Geophysics 41, no. 4: 240–249. doi: 10.1071/EG10022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtham, E., D. Marchant, M. McMillan, and E. Haber. 2017. Advanced modelling of electromagnetic data. In Proceedings of exploration 17: Sixth decennial international conference on mineral exploration, ed. V. Tschirhart and M. Thomas, 209–219.
   Google Scholar
• Ley-Cooper, A.Y., T. Munday, A. Viezzoli, J. Guillemoteau, J. Macnae, and L. Cox. 2013. Oversolicitous attention on airborne EM modelling. First near surface Asia pacific conference and exhibition, Beijing China, July 16–19, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ley-Cooper, A.Y., A. Viezzoli, J. Guillemoteau, G. Vignoli, J. Macnae, L. Cox, and T. Munday. 2015. Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition. Exploration Geophysics 46, no. 1: 74–84. doi:10.1071/EG14045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and C.C. Yin. 2013. 3D inversion for frequency-domain HEM data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 56: 4278–4287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-H., C.-C. Yin, X.-Y. Ren, and C.-K. Qiu. 2016. 3D parallel inversion of time-domain airborne EM data. Applied Geophysics 13, no. 4: 701–711. doi: 10.1007/s11770-016-0581-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnae, J. 2015a. Automated airborne EM anomaly picking and 3D model fitting. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2015. 24th international geophysical conference and exhibition, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Macnae, J. 2015b. 3D-spectral CDIs: A fast alternative to 3D inversion?: Exploration geophysics 46, special issue. 6th international conference in airborne electromagnetics (AEM 2013), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Macnae, J., A. King, N. Stolz, A. Osmakoff, and A. Blaha. 1998. Fast AEM data processing and inversion. Exploration Geophysics 29, no. 1/2: 163–169. doi: 10.1071/EG998163
   Google Scholar
• Oldenberg, D., and Y. Li. 2005. Inversion in applied geophysics, a tutorial. In Near Surface Geophysics, ed. D. Butler, 89–150, SEG.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, R., J. Silic, and D. Fitzgerald. 2016. Improved structural mapping and conductive targeting delivered by a new 2.5D AEM inversion solver. ASEG conference abstracts, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pirttijärvi, M., R. Pietilä, A. Hattula, and S.-E. Hjelt. 2003. Modelling and inversion of electromagnetic data using an approximate plate model. Geophysical Prospecting 50, no. 5: 425–440. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00332.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiche, A., F. Sugeng, G. Wilson, and W.P. Boulevard. 2007. Practical 3D EM inversion – the P223F software suite. ASEG extended abstracts 2007. 19th geophysical conference.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, X., C. Yin, J. Macnae, Y. Liu, and Z. Bo. 2018. 3D time-domain airborne EM inversion based on secondary field finite-volume method. Geophysics. doi:10.1190/geo2017-0585.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viezzoli, A., E. Auken, and T. Munday. 2009. Spatially constrained inversion for quasi 3D modelling of airborne electromagnetic data—An application for environmental assessment in the Lower Murray Region of South Australia. Exploration Geophysics 40, no. 2: 173–183. doi: 10.1071/EG08027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, G. F., and J. Macnae, 1991. Physics of the electromagnetic induction exploration method. In Nabighian, M. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Volume 2, Applications, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., D.W. Oldenburg, and E. Haber. 2014. 3-D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data parallelized and accelerated by local mesh and adaptive soundings. Geophysical Journal International 196, no. 3: 1492–1507. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, C.C., X.Y. Ren, Y.H. Liu, Y.F. Qi, C.K. Qiu, and J. Cai. 2015. Review on airborne electromagnetic inverse theory and applications. Geophysics 80: W17–W31. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0421.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar