Seismic impedance inversion via L0 gradient minimisation

References

• Aster, A.C., B. Borchers, and C.H. Thurber. 2013. Parameter estimation and inverse problems. 2nd ed. Elsevier Academic Press: Waltham.
   Google Scholar
• Berteussen, K.A., and B. Ursin. 1983. Approximate computation from seismic data. Geophysics 48: 1351–1358. doi: 10.1190/1.1441415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candes, E., and J. Romberg. 2006. Robust signal recovery from incomplete observations. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1281–1284.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., M. Zeng, and X. Liu. 2014. Feature-preserving filtering with L0 gradient minimization. Computers & Graphics 38 no. 1: 150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2013.10.025
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, D.A., and W.A. Schneider. 1983. Generalized linear inversion of reflection seismic data. Geophysics 48 no. 6: 665–676. doi: 10.1190/1.1441497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, R., F. Zhang, and H. Liu. 2016. Seismic inversion based on proximal objective function optimization algorithm. Geophysics 81 no. 5: R237–R246. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0590.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, R., C. Yin, S. Yang, and F. Zhang. 2018. Seismic deconvolution and inversion with erratic data. Geophysical Prospecting 66 no. 9: 1684–1701. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho, D. 2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 52 no. 4: 1289–1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elad, M. 2010. Sparse and redundant representations: from theory to applications in signal and image processing. Springer: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, M. 1975. Transmission effects in the continuous one-dimensional seismic model. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 42: 519–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05875.x
   Google Scholar
• Gholami, A. 2015. Nonlinear multichannel impedance inversion by total-variation regularization. Geophysics 80: R217–R224. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0004.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami, A. 2016. A fast automatic multichannel blind seismic inversion for high-resolution impedance recovery. Geophysics 81: V357–V364. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0654.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami, A., and M.D. Sacchi. 2012. A fast and automatic sparse deconvolution in the presence of outliers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50: 4105–4116. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2189777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, H., and A. Pidlisecky. 2015. Multitrace impedance inversion with lateral constraints. Geophysics 80: M101–M111. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0546.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A., R. Fergus, F. Durand, and W.T. Freeman. 2007. Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture. Acm Transactions on Graphics 26: 3. Article 70. doi: 10.1145/1276377.1276464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., and F. Zhang. 2017. Amplitude-versus-angle inversion based on the L1-norm-based likelihood function and the total variation regularization constraint. Geophysics 82 no. 3: R173–R182. doi: 10.1190/geo2016-0182.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat. 2009. A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way. Elsevier Inc: Burlington.
   Google Scholar
• Menke, W. 1984. Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. Academic Press Inc: Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, R.M.H, and M.S. Brown. 2015. Fast and effective L0 gradient minimization by region fusion. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 208–216.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, S., L. Loures, F. Moraes, and C. Theodoro. 2009. Nonlinear impedance inversion for attenuating media. Geophysics 74 no. 6: R111–R117. doi: 10.1190/1.3256284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, E.A., and S. Treitel. 1980. Geophysical signal analysis. NJ: Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, M.D. 1997. Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution. Geophysical Journal International 129: 651–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb04500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantola, A. 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 49: 1259–1266. doi: 10.1190/1.1441754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse problem theory: methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc: Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Thierry, P., S. Operton, and G. Lambare. 1999. Fast 2-D ray + born migration/inversion in complex media. Geophysics 64: 162–181. doi: 10.1190/1.1444513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., J. Yang, W. Yin, and Y. Zhang. 2008. A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences 1 no. 3: 248–272. doi: 10.1137/080724265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., C. Lu, Y. Xu, and J. Jia. 2011. Image smoothing via L0 gradient minimization. Acm Transactions on Graphics 30: 6. Article 174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, X., X. Liu, G. Wu, and Z. Zong. 2016. Basis pursuit inversion method under model constraint. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum 55: 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Youzwishen, C. F. 2001 Non-linear sparse and blocky constraints for seismic inverse problems. Master thesis, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., S. Wang, C. Luo, and Y. He. 2015. Simultaneous multitrace impedance inversion with transform-domain sparsity promotion. Geophysics 80 no. 2: R71–R80. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0065.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., R. Dai, and H. Liu. 2014. Seismic inversion based on L1-norm misfit function and total variation regularization. Journal of Applied Geophysics 109: 111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., and X. Yin. 2004. An acoustic impedance inversion approach using discrete inversion theory. 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts 1854–1857.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., M.K. Sen, S. Phan, and S. Srinivasan. 2012. Stochastic and deterministic seismic inversion methods for thin-bed resolution. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 9: 611–618. doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/9/5/611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar