https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7751-3259
References
- Atchuta Rao, R.D., B.H.V. Ram, and N.P.V. Sanker. 1981. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: The complex gradient method. Geophysics 46: 1572–8.
- Bastani, M., and L.B. Pedersen. 2001. Automatic interpretation of magnetic dike parameters using the analytical signal technique. Geophysics 66: 551–61.
- Cooper, G.R.J. 2015. Using the analytic signal amplitude to determine the location and depth of thin dikes from magnetic data. Geophysics 80: J1–6.
- Hansen, R.O., and M. Simmonds. 1993. Multiple-source Werner deconvolution. Geophysics 58: 1792–800.
- Hartman, R.R., D.J. Teskey, and J.L. Friedberg. 1971. A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics 36: 891–918.
- Hsu, S.K., D. Coppens, and C.T. Shyu. 1998. Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal. Geophysics 63: 1947–57.
- Hsu, S.K., J.C. Sibuet, and C.T. Shyu. 1996. High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics 61: 373–86.
- Hou, Z.C. 1981. Filtering of smooth compensation. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum 20: 22–9.
- Keating, P., and M. Pilkington. 2004. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting 52: 165–82.
- Ma, G., and X. Du. 2012. An improved analytic signal technique for the depth and structural index from 2D magnetic anomaly data. Pure and Applied Geophysics 169: 2193–200.
- Ma, G., and L. Li. 2013. Direct analytic signal (DAS) method in the interpretation of magnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics 88: 101–4.
- Macleod, I.N., K. Jones, and T.F. Dai. 1993. 3-D analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes. Exploration Geophysics 24: 679–88.
- Nabighian, M.N. 1972. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37: 507–17.
- Reid, A.B., J.M. Allsop, H. Granser, A.J. Millett, and I.W. Somerton. 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55: 80–91.
- Roest, W.R., J. Verhoef, and M. Pilkington. 1992. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57: 116–25.
- Salem, A., and D. Ravat. 2003. A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data. Geophysics 68: 1952–61.
- Salem, A., D. Ravat, M.F. Mushayandebvu, and K. Ushijima. 2004. Linearized least-squares method for interpretation of potential-field data from sources of simple geometry. Geophysics 69: 783–8.
- Salem, A., S.E. Williams, J.D. Fairhead, D. Ravat, and R. Smith. 2007. Tilt-depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives. The Leading Edge 26: 1502–5.
- Salem, A., S.E. Williams, J.D. Fairhead, R. Smith, and D. Ravat. 2008. Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives. Geophysics 73: L1–10.
- Smith, R.S., and A. Salem. 2005. Imaging depth, structure, and susceptibility from magnetic data: The advanced source-parameter imaging method. Geophysics 70: L31–38.
- Thompson, D.T. 1982. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics 47: 31–7.
- Thurston, J.B., and R.S. Smith. 1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method. Geophysics 62: 807–13.
- Zhang, H.L., X.Y. Hu, and T.Y. Liu. 2012. Fast inversion of magnetic source boundary and top depth via second order derivative. Chinese Journal of Geophysics 55: 3839–47.
- Zhou, S., and D.N. Huang. 2015. Determining the depth of certain gravity sources without a priori specification of their structural index. Journal of Applied Geophysics 122: 172–80.
- Zhou, S., D. Huang, and C. Su. 2016. Magnetic anomaly depth and structural index estimation using different height analytic signals data. Journal of Applied Geophysics 132: 146–51.