Impact of modulus of elasticity of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on meibomian glands morphology and function

References

• Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian Gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1938–1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerling G, Baudouin C, Aragona P, et al. Emerging strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction: proceedings of the OCEAN group meeting. Ocular Surface. 2017;15:179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddireddy JS, Vijay AK, Tan J, et al. The eyelids and tear film in contact lens discomfort. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41:144–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Keya L, Jalbert I, et al. epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Caffery B, Dogru M, et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ. Strong growth in some segments and a few surprises highlight a year of modest gains overall. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2016;31:18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Nichols JJ, Woods CA, et al. Trends in US contact lens prescribing. 2002 to 2014. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:758–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeniad B, Beginoglu M, Bilgin LK., et al. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy in contact lens users and patients with dry eye. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36:140–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, et al. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea. 2002;21:469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, et al. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20:610–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, et al. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong BL, Larke JR. Meibomian gland dysfunction: some clinical, biochemical and physical observations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990;10:144–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Al‐Dossari M, Pritchard N, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of the bulbar conjunctiva. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37:335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, et al. Contact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glands. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriquez AS, Korb DR. Meibomian glands and contact lens wear. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65:108–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi WM, Markoulli M, Holden BA, et al. Impact of duration of contact lens wears on the structure and function of the meibomian glands. Ophthalmic and Physiol Opt. 2016;36:120–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machalinska A, Zakrzewska A, Adamek B, et al. Comparison of morphological and functional Meibomian gland characteristics between daily contact lens wearers and nonwearers. Cornea. 2015;34:1098–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucker AD, Lisa A, Jordon J, et al. Associations with meibomian gland atrophy in daily contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;92:e206–e213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G. Exploring the relationship between materials and ocular comfort and health. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2007; 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, et al. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:193–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder C. Modulus and its effect on contact lens fit. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2007; 22.
   Google Scholar
• Fonn D, MacDonald K, Richter D, et al. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:176–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngo W, Situ P, Keir N, et al. Psychometric properties and validation of the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness questionnaire. Cornea. 2013;32:1204–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb DR, Blackie CA. Meibomian gland diagnostic expressibilty: correlation with dry eye symptoms and gland location. Cornea. 2008;27:1142–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2006–2049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows JF, Ramamoorthy P, Nichols JJ, et al. Development of the 4-3-2-1 meibum expressibility scale. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38:86–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, et al. Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:911–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Tseng S, Sanabria O, et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea. 1998;17:38–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani E, Ceresara G, Beretta S, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of meibomian glands in contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:5215–5219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pult H, Britta H, Riede P, et al. Relation between upper and lower lids meibomian gland morphology, tear film, and dry eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:310–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann LC, Tomlinson A, Pearce EI, et al. Tear and meibomian gland function in blepharitis and normals. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng CL, Thao NY. Mechanical complications induced by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39:115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French K. Contact lens material properties. Part 2—mechanical behaviour and modulus. Optician. 2005;230:29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cox SM, Berntsen DA, Chatterjee N, et al. Eyelid margin and meibomian gland characteristics and symptoms in lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:901–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom MM, Bruce AS. Prelens tear stability: relationship to symptoms of dryness. Optometry. 2009;80:181–184.
   Google Scholar
• Finis D, Pischel N, Konig C, et al. of the OSDI and SPEED questionnaires for the evaluation of dry eye disease in clinical routine. Ophthalmologe. 2014;111:1050–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar